Cited by 103Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPhilosophy and History of Science

A review of causal estimation of effects in mediation analyses

Ten Have, Thomas R, Joffe, Marshall M·2012·Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Abstract

We describe causal mediation methods for analysing the mechanistic factors through which interventions act on outcomes. A number of different mediation approaches have been presented in the biomedical, social science and statistical literature with an emphasis on different aspects of mediation. We review the different sets of assumptions that allow identification and estimation of effects in the simple case of a single intervention, a temporally subsequent mediator and outcome. These assumptions include various no confounding assumptions including sequential ignorability assumptions and also interaction assumptions involving the treatment and mediator. The understanding of such assumptions is crucial since some can be assessed under certain conditions (e.g. treatment–mediator interactions), whereas others cannot (sequential ignorability). These issues become more complex with multiple mediators and longitudinal outcomes. In addressing these assumptions, we review several causal approaches to mediation analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0962280210391076

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ten Have, T. R., & Joffe, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Published
2010-12-16
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
77-107
ISSN
  • 0962-2802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0334
OpenAlex
W2013610310
Cited by
103
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistical Methods in Medical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH078016, R01MH061892)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA095415)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
causal mediation analysis, mediating effect, sequential ignorability, multiple mediators, longitudinal outcomes, intervention mechanisms, causal effect estimation
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Suicide, Models, Statistical, Bias, Causality, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review