Cited by 575Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and TestingBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Taking Account of Time Lags in Causal Models

Gollob, Harry F., Reichardt, Charles S.·1987·Child Development

Abstract

Although it takes time for a cause to exert an effect, causal models often fail to allow adequately for time lags. In particular, causal models that contain cross-sectional relations (i.e., relations between values of 2 variables at the same time) are unsatisfactory because they omit the values of variables at prior times, they omit effects that variables can have on themselves, and they fail to specify the length of the causal interval that is being studied. These omissions can produce severe biases in estimates of the size of causal effects. Longitudinal models also can fail to take account of time lags properly, and this too can lead to severely biased estimates. The discussion illustrates the biases that can occur in both cross-sectional and longitudinal models, introduces the latent longitudinal approach to causal modeling, and shows how latent longitudinal models can be used to reduce bias by taking account of time lags even when data are available for only 1 point in time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1130293

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The outcomes of longitudinal models depend largely on the time-interval between observations.

    “As the outcomes of these longitudinal models depend largely on the time-interval between observations41,42, the annual nature of the data needs to be considered.”

    From Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media (2022) · cites this paper as [41]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1987-02
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
80
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048878602
Cited by
572
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH38305)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
time delay, causal models, longitudinal modeling, estimation bias
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Psychological, Mothers, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review