Cited by 382Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collective Intelligence and Group Performance

Woolley, Anita Williams, Aggarwal, Ishani, Malone, Thomas W.·2015·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

We review recent research on collective intelligence, which we define as the ability of a group to perform a wide variety of tasks. We focus on two influences on a group’s collective intelligence: (a) group composition (e.g., the members’ skills, diversity, and intelligence) and (b) group interaction (e.g., structures, processes, and norms). We also call for more research to investigate how social interventions and technological tools can be used to enhance collective intelligence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721415599543

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Larson J. R. (2010). (See References). A more extensive review of the conditions that elicit synergistic gains in teams.
  2. Aggarwal I., 2014, Symposium presented at the 50th Meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology
  3. Aggarwal I., 2015, Paper presented at the 2015 Collective Intelligence Conference
  4. Chabris C. F., 2007, Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition, 449
  5. Kim Y. J., 2015, Paper presented at the 2015 Collective Intelligence Conference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 380

Metadata

Authors
Woolley, A. W., Aggarwal, I., & Malone, T. W.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas (BR)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Woolley, Anita Williams
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2015-12
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
420-424
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2194225532
Cited by
382
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9
FWCI
24.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Cisco Systems
  • Carnegie Mellon University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
collective intelligence, group performance, group composition, group diversity, group interaction, group norms, group structure, social intervention, technological tools, task performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review