Cited by 248Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The Social Functions of Group Rituals

Watson-Jones, Rachel E., Legare, Cristine H.·2016·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Convergent developments across social scientific disciplines provide evidence that ritual is a psychologically prepared, culturally inherited, behavioral trademark of our species. We draw on evidence from the anthropological and evolutionary-science literatures to offer a psychological account of the social functions of ritual for group behavior. Solving the adaptive problems associated with group living requires psychological mechanisms for identifying group members, ensuring their commitment to the group, facilitating cooperation with coalitions, and maintaining group cohesion. The intersection of these lines of inquiry yields new avenues for theory and research on the evolution and ontogeny of social group cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721415618486

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rituals serve many psychological functions.

    “Despite rituals' lack of clear instrumental purpose, it is now well known that rituals serve many psychological functions (e.g., Boyer & Liénard, 2006;Watson-Jones & Legare, 2016).”

    From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Watson-Jones & Legare, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson-Jones, R. E., & Legare, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Legare, Cristine H.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2016-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
42-46
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2326787168
Cited by
248
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
35.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I005455/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
ritual, collective ritual, social function of ritual, group cognition, group cohesion, group identification, group commitment, cooperation, coalitions, ritual evolution, cultural evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review