CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 336Team Dynamics and PerformanceEmployee Performance and LeadershipOrganizational Management and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Innovation Imperative: The Relationships Between Team Climate, Innovation, and Performance in Research and Development Teams

Bain, Paul G., Mann, Leon, Pirola-Merlo, Andrew·2001·Small Group Research
DOI 10.1177/104649640103200103
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A team’s climate for innovation has been shown to be important for innovation in management and work teams. This article investigates the relationship of team climate with project team innovation and performance in research and development organizations. It is argued that the relationship between team climate and innovation will be stronger for research teams than development teams as research teams have greater scope for creating novel and innovative ideas. A sample of 193 scientists and technologists in 20 research teams and 18 development teams were measured on their team’s climate for innovation, team performance, and six indicators of innovation. Research and development teams showed similar ratings for team climate and for measures of innovation. However, the relationships between team climate and individual and team innovation were stronger for research teams than development teams. These findings are significant for fostering innovativeness and innovation in knowledge work teams.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104649640103200103

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dunning, J., 1st International Work Psychology Conference
  2. Ekvall, G., 1983, Creative organizational climate: Construction and validation of a measuring instrument
  3. Pirola-Merlo, A. J. (2000). Innovation in R&D project teams: Modelling the effects of individual, team and organisational factors . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–334 of 334

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bain, P. G., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Melbourne
Corresponding author
Mann, Leon
ORCID
Venue
Small Group Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
55-73
ISSN
  • 1046-4964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8278
DOI
10.1177/104649640103200103
OpenAlex
W1974062135
Cited by
336
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Small Group Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
Keywords
team climate, innovation climate, team performance, research groups, development teams, R&D organization, innovation indicators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review