Cited by 153Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity and Health Practices

Experiences of Self-Monitoring: Successes and Struggles During Treatment for Weight Loss

Open access
Burke, Lora E., Swigart, Valerie, Warziski Turk, Melanie, Derro, Nicole, Ewing, Linda J.·2009·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

We interviewed 15 individuals who completed a behavioral weight loss treatment study with the aim of exploring participants' reflections on their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors while using a paper diary to self-monitor their diet. Constant comparative and matrix analysis procedures were used to analyze interview data; the qualitative results were then interfaced with descriptive numerical data on individuals' adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss. Three categories of self-monitoring experience were identified: (a) well-disciplined—those who had high adherence to self-monitoring, high weight loss, and a “can do” positive approach, (b) missing the connection—those who had moderate adherence, moderate- to low weight loss, and an “it's an assignment” approach, without integrating self-monitoring into everyday life, and (c) diminished support—those who had poor adherence, poor weight control, and were adversely affected by coexisting negative factors. Given the variations in how individuals integrated the process of self-monitoring, we need to consider individualizing self-monitoring strategies to improve adherence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732309335395

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The best recorders were those who were engaged in a structured weight loss program for the first time.

    “Using data from in-depth interviews focused on the experience of self-monitoring, other researchers reported that the best recorders were those who were engaged in a structured weight loss program for the first time (43).”

    From Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature (2011) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results section identifies the Well-Disciplined participants as having high adherence to self-monitoring, and reports that four of the five had not previously participated in a weight-loss program. This supports the pattern described, but not an unqualified claim that all the best recorders were first-time participants. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A lack of support for participants once an intervention ended was a common theme at the intervention level.

    “A common theme at the interventional level was a lack of support for participants once an intervention ended [29, 34, 38, 39, 47, 51, 55, 60, 61].”

    From Barriers and facilitators to diet, physical activity and lifestyle behavior intervention adherence: a qualitative systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (Concepts Common across Cases; page unavailable) say most participants valued group support and struggled when meetings became less frequent. That supports reduced intervention support as a common issue, but the paper describes this happening during the program, not after the intervention ended. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Subsidizing or covering external costs can create intervention reliance.

    “However, this type of approach can create intervention reliance [29, 34, 38, 39, 47, 51, 55, 60, 61] and should be evaluated for its potential to limit sustainable change once an intervention ends.”

    From Barriers and facilitators to diet, physical activity and lifestyle behavior intervention adherence: a qualitative systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results ('Being part of the program'; page unavailable) report that some participants depended on the intervention’s structure and support and struggled to self-monitor when meetings became less frequent. The paper does not link that reliance to subsidizing or covering external costs, so it supports the reliance point but not the claimed cause. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lack of support after an intervention ended could be attributed to participants' reliance on intervention tools or experts for monitoring, or to losing accountability to interventionists.

    “This could have been attributed to participants discussion of reliance on intervention tools or experts for monitoring [28, 30, 32, 34, 49, 51, 56, 58, 61], or losing accountability to interventionists [28, 29, 35, 38, 39, 41, 44, 50].”

    From Barriers and facilitators to diet, physical activity and lifestyle behavior intervention adherence: a qualitative systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results section (‘Being part of the program’) reports that participants struggled to continue self-monitoring when group meetings became less frequent; one participant said it helped to know someone would review their records. This supports reliance on program support and accountability, but the passage describes reduced contact during the intervention, not a lack of support after it ended. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among BWL participants, burden and boredom hinder accurate and consistent self-monitoring.

    “research among BWL participants revealed that burden and boredom are barriers to accurate and consistent self-monitoring”

    From Associations Between Self-Monitoring and Weight Change in Behavioral Weight Loss Interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Burke, Swigart, Warziski Turk, Derro, & Ewing, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, L. E., Swigart, V., Warziski Turk, M., Derro, N., & Ewing, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Chatham University, and Carlow University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  • Allegheny General Hospital (US)
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2009-04-13
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
815-828
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2133196818
Cited by
153
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (P30NR003924)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK058631-04S1, R01DK058631)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
self-monitoring, behavioral weight loss, weight loss, participant experiences, social support, weight management
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diet Records, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review