Cited by 39Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Integrating user perspectives into the development of a web‐based weight management intervention

Yardley, L., Williams, S., Bradbury, K., Garip, G., Renouf, S., Ware, L., Dorling, H., Smith, E. +1 more·2012·Clinical Obesity

Abstract

Summary: The objective of this study was to adapt the design of our weight management intervention to the needs, expectations and capabilities of potential users. In study 1, we interviewed 25 people about their experiences of weight management. The findings of these interviews were combined with findings from existing theory and research in a process of ‘intervention planning’ that informed the design of the intervention. Study 2 comprised in‐depth think‐aloud studies with a further 16 people interested in using a web‐based intervention to manage their weight, in order to elicit reactions to the intervention techniques and materials. In study 1, overly intrusive and restrictive aspects of eating self‐regulation were commonly cited reasons for failure to maintain weight management long‐term. We therefore designed an intervention with a more flexible approach to autonomous self‐regulation. This approach was broadly welcomed in study 2, but there were indications that some participants might have difficulty effectively implementing self‐regulation techniques independently. A flexible and autonomous approach to changing eating habits is attractive to potential intervention users but may be difficult for some users to implement successfully.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cob.12001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The efficacy of the Web-based POWeR intervention and participants' views of the specific content provided by the Web-based intervention have been the focus of previous qualitative studies and randomized controlled trials within health care and community settings.

    “The efficacy of the Web-based POWeR intervention and participants’ views of the specific content provided by the Web-based intervention have been the focus of previous qualitative studies [57] and randomized controlled trials within health care [58] and community settings [59].”
  • POWeR specifically encourages users to employ food diaries only occasionally, as diagnostic tools when necessary, and not to rely on them for long-term weight management.

    “POWeR specifically encourages users to employ food diaries only occasionally, as diagnostic tools when necessary, and not to rely on them for long-term weight management[18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yardley, L., Williams, S., Bradbury, K., Garip, G., Renouf, S., Ware, L., Dorling, H., Smith, E., & Little, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Yardley, L.
Venue
Clinical Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10
Volume
2
Issue
5-6
Pages
132-141
ISSN
  • 1758-8103 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8111
OpenAlex
W1951575360
Cited by
39
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Warwick
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
weight management interventions, online intervention, user-centered design, eating self-regulation, dietary habits, think-aloud, intervention planning, obesity, user perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review