Cited by 42Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPalliative and Oncologic Care

Mindfulness Training Supports Quality of Life and Advance Care Planning in Adults With Metastatic Cancer and Their Caregivers: Results of a Pilot Study

Open access
Johns, Shelley A., Beck-Coon, Kathleen, Stutz, Patrick V., Talib, Tasneem L., Chinh, Kelly, Cottingham, Ann H., Schmidt, Karen, Shields, Cleveland +5 more·2020·American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®

Abstract

Background: Emotional distress often causes patients with cancer and their family caregivers (FCGs) to avoid end-of-life discussions and advance care planning (ACP), which may undermine quality of life (QoL). Most ACP interventions fail to address emotional barriers that impede timely ACP. Aim: We assessed feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a mindfulness-based intervention to facilitate ACP for adults with advanced-stage cancer and their FCGs. Design: A single-arm pilot was conducted to assess the impact of a 6-week group mindfulness intervention on ACP behaviors (patients only), QoL, family communication, avoidant coping, distress, and other outcomes from baseline (T1) to post-intervention (T2) and 1 month later (T3). Participants: Eligible patients had advanced-stage solid malignancies, limited ACP engagement, and an FCG willing to participate. Thirteen dyads (N = 26 participants) enrolled at an academic cancer center in the United States. Results: Of eligible patients, 59.1% enrolled. Attendance (70.8% across 6 sessions) and retention (84.6% for patients; 92.3% for FCGs) through T3 were acceptable. Over 90% of completers reported high intervention satisfaction. From T1 to T3, patient engagement more than doubled in each of 3 ACP behaviors assessed. Patients reported large significant decreases in distress at T2 and T3. Family caregivers reported large significant improvements in QoL and family communication at T2 and T3. Both patients and FCGs reported notable reductions in sleep disturbance and avoidant coping at T3. Conclusions: The mindfulness intervention was feasible and acceptable and supported improvements in ACP and associated outcomes for patients and FCGs. A randomized trial of mindfulness training for ACP is warranted. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT02367508 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02367508 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049909119862254

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that previous pilot, 59% of eligible patients and 100% of eligible caregivers enrolled, retention at 1-month follow-up was 85% for patients and 92% for caregivers, patient advance care planning engagement nearly doubled, and both patients and caregivers showed large, significant improvement in quality of life.

    “Specifically, 59% of eligible patients and 100% of eligible caregivers enrolled and retention rates were high at 1-month follow-up (85% for patients and 92% for caregivers). From baseline to 1-month follow-up, patient engagement in advance care planning nearly doubled, and both patients and caregivers showed large, significant improvement in quality of life.”

    From Mindfulness to enhance quality of life and support advance care planning: a pilot randomized controlled trial for adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a previous single-arm pilot with cancer patient-caregiver dyads, the mindfulness-based intervention was feasible, acceptable, and showed preliminary efficacy.

    “Our own single-arm pilot with cancer patient-caregiver dyads was the first to test the impact of a mindfulness-based intervention on advance care planning in any population [32]. Results supported the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of this group-based intervention [32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]Michael N, O’Callaghan C, Clayton J, Understanding how cancer patients actualise, relinquish, and reject advance care planning: implications for practice. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013; 21(8): 2195– 2205. 23494583
  2. [74]Jha AP, Stanley EA, Kiyonaga A, Wong L, Gelfand L. Examining the protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective experience. Emotion. 2010; 10(1): 54– 64. 20141302

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johns, S. A., Beck-Coon, K., Stutz, P. V., Talib, T. L., Chinh, K., Cottingham, A. H., Schmidt, K., Shields, C., Stout, M. E., Stump, T. E., Monahan, P. O., Torke, A. M., & Helft, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Indiana University Health (US)
Corresponding author
Johns, Shelley A.
Venue
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2019-08-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
88-99
ISSN
  • 1049-9091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2715
OpenAlex
W2966302561
Cited by
42
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K05CA175048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, advance care planning, metastatic cancer, family caregivers, quality of life, end-of-life discussions, emotional distress, avoidance coping, family communication, sleep disorders, feasibility and acceptability, group intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Social Support, Terminal Care, Caregivers, Advance Care Planning, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review