Cited by 17Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Relations of Mindfulness and Illness Acceptance With Psychosocial Functioning in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Caregivers.

Open access
Chinh, Kelly, Secinti, Ekin, Johns, Shelley, Hirsh, Adam, Miller, Kathy, Schneider, Bryan, Storniolo, Anna Maria, Mina, Lida +3 more·2020·Oncology Nursing Forum

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine relationships in mindfulness and illness acceptance and psychosocial functioning in patients with metastatic breast cancer and their family caregivers. SAMPLE & SETTING: 33 dyads from an academic cancer center in the United States. METHODS & VARIABLES: Participants completed questionnaires on mindfulness, illness acceptance, relationship quality, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Dyadic, cross-sectional data were analyzed using actor- partner interdependence models. RESULTS: Greater nonjudging, acting with awareness, and illness acceptance among caregivers were associated with patients' and caregivers' perceptions of better relationship quality. Higher levels of these processes were associated with reduced anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients and caregivers. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Aspects of mindfulness and illness acceptance in dyads confer benefits that are primarily intrapersonal in nature. Nurses may consider introducing mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions to patients and caregivers with adjustment difficulties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/20.onf.739-752

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 4 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    The benefits of mindfulness and illness acceptance processes are more intrapersonal than interpersonal.

    “The current findings contribute to a small body of research suggesting that the benefits of mindfulness and illness acceptance processes are more intrapersonal than interpersonal in nature (Pakenham & Samios, 2013; Schellekens et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pakenham & Samios, 2013 source
    • cites Schellekens et al., 2017 source

      The Results (Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: Psychological Distress; page unavailable) find associations between each person's mindfulness and lower distress, but no corresponding partner effect. This supports the intrapersonal-versus-interpersonal comparison for mindfulness in couples facing lung cancer. The paper examines self-compassion, not illness acceptance as a separate process, so it does not establish that comparison for illness acceptance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Caregivers' nonjudging and acting with awareness were positively associated with their own and patients' relationship quality.

    “caregivers’ levels of nonjudging and acting with awareness were positively associated with their own perception of their relationship quality (actor effects: β = 0.4, p = 0.022 for nonjudging and β = 0.39. p = 0.028 for acting with awareness), as well as patients’ perception of their relationship quality (partner effects: β = 0.46, p = 0.007 for nonjudging and β = 0.46, p = 0.007 for acting with”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In patients and caregivers, nonjudging, acting with awareness, and illness acceptance were negatively associated with their own depressive symptoms.

    “For patients and caregivers, nonjudging, acting with awareness, and illness acceptance were associated with a decrease in their own depressive symptoms (patient actor effects: β = −0.69, p < 0.001 for nonjudging, β = −0.42, p = 0.016 for acting with awareness, and β = −0.68, p < 0.001 for illness acceptance; caregiver actor effects: β = −0.38, p = 0.029 for nonjudging, β = −0.4, p = 0.021 for”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Caregivers' illness acceptance was positively associated with patients' relationship quality.

    “caregivers’ greater acceptance of the patients’ illness was associated with a marginal increase in their own perception of their relationship quality (β = 0.3, p = 0.092) and a significant increase in patients’ perception of their relationship quality (β = 0.41, p = 0.015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In patients and caregivers, nonjudging and illness acceptance were negatively associated with their own anxiety symptoms.

    “patients’ and caregivers’ levels of nonjudging and illness acceptance were negatively associated with their own anxiety symptoms (patient actor effects: β = −0.69, p < 0.001 for nonjudging and β = −0.53, p = 0.001 for illness acceptance; caregiver actor effects: β = −0.42, p = 0.014 for nonjudging and β = −0.59, p < 0.001 for illness acceptance)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mindfulness and illness acceptance processes were not significantly associated with partners' anxiety or depressive symptoms.

    “but were unrelated to their partner’s anxiety symptoms (β = −0.14–0.07)”
    • Also stated in: § Dyadic Analyses · plain
      “but were not significantly related to their partner’s depressive symptoms (β = −0.29 to 0.09).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Dyadic data were analyzed with actor-partner interdependence models that account for interdependence between dyad members.

    “In APIMs, the unit of analysis is the patient-caregiver dyad, which allows the effects within and between dyads to be examined and takes into account the interdependence of data from dyad members.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kenny et al., 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

2 of 2
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The eligibility criterion of living with the patient or visiting at least twice a week ensured that dyads had a shared psychosocial experience of cancer.

    “This eligibility criterion ensured that dyads had a shared psychosocial experience of cancer.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Societal expectations differ for caregivers and patients, with caregivers expected to be emotionally resilient and strong for the patient.

    “Societal expectations differ for caregivers and patients, with caregivers expected to be emotionally resilient and strong for the patient.”
2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chinh, K., Secinti, E., Johns, S., Hirsh, A., Miller, K., Schneider, B., Storniolo, A. M., Mina, L., Newton, E., Champion, V., & Mosher, C.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Chinh, Kelly
Venue
Oncology Nursing Forum
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
739-752
ISSN
  • 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0688
OpenAlex
W3092720409
Cited by
17
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K05CA175048)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
mindfulness, acceptance of illness, psychosocial functioning, metastatic breast cancer, family caregivers, patient-caregiver dyads, relationship quality, anxiety, depressive symptoms, non-judgment, acting with awareness, acceptance-based interventions
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Functioning, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review