Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perinatal Bereavement Grief Scale: Distinguishing Grief From Depression Following Miscarriage

Ritsher, Jennifer Boyd, Neugebauer, Richard·2002·Assessment

Abstract

The study evaluated the Perinatal Bereavement Grief Scale (PBGS), the first scale designed to measure grief following reproductive loss in terms of yearning for the lost pregnancy and lost baby. Participants included 304 women interviewed by telephone 1 to 3 times within 6 months after miscarriage. The PBGS had high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It showed convergent validity with measures of attachment and investment in the child and divergent validity against measures of social desirability and depressive symptoms, supporting the conceptual distinction between grief and depression. Cross-cultural validity was acceptable whether tested by language (Spanish vs. English) or ethnicity (Hispanic vs. other). This measure of yearning enables study of the epidemiology and prognostic value of this key feature of mourning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191102009001005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.3928/0048-5713-19860501-06 · DOI
  2. Beutel, M., 1995, Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 45, 295
  3. Bowlby, J., 1980, Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression
  4. 10.1176/ajp.147.5.608 · DOI
  5. Clayton, P., 1982, Handbook of affective disorders
  6. Clayton, P. J., 1998, Adversity, stress, and psychopathology, 96, 10.1093/oso/9780195121926.003.0007 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/h0047358 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Elders, M. A., 1995, Issues in Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 67
  9. Jacobs, S., 1990, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 51, 269
  10. 10.2190/8QD0-W9R6-QX96-A5K3 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01428.x · DOI
  12. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114335 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/00332747.1986.11024331 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1978.tb02468.x · DOI
  15. Muller, M. E., 1992, Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 6, 5, 10.1891/0889-7182.6.1.5 · DOI
  16. 10.1176/ajp.137.9.1081 · DOI
  17. Neugebauer, R., 1987, The epidemiology of psychiatric disorders, 136
  18. 10.2105/AJPH.82.10.1332 · DOI
  19. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb128375.x · DOI
  20. Osterweis, M., 1988, Mental health professionals and the bereaved
  21. 10.1080/00332747.1980.11024061 · DOI
  22. Phipps, S., 1981, Social Biology, 28, 1
  23. 10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1192/bjp.174.1.67 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/07399863980203006 · DOI
  27. Sanchez-Ayendez, M., 1988, Women & Health, 14, 239
  28. Shapiro, E. R., 1995, Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 1, 159
  29. 10.1192/bjp.166.5.583 · DOI
  30. Walsh, F., 1991, Living beyond loss: Death in the family
  31. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112455 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00004583-198907000-00001 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/1129668 · DOI
  34. 10.1176/ajp.139.12.1590 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90170-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Ritsher, J. B., & Neugebauer, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Veterans Affairs and Stanford University
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University
Venue
Assessment
Published
2002-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
31-40
ISSN
  • 1073-1911
  • 1552-3489
Cited by
43
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review