The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perinatal Bereavement Grief Scale: Distinguishing Grief From Depression Following Miscarriage
Abstract
The study evaluated the Perinatal Bereavement Grief Scale (PBGS), the first scale designed to measure grief following reproductive loss in terms of yearning for the lost pregnancy and lost baby. Participants included 304 women interviewed by telephone 1 to 3 times within 6 months after miscarriage. The PBGS had high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It showed convergent validity with measures of attachment and investment in the child and divergent validity against measures of social desirability and depressive symptoms, supporting the conceptual distinction between grief and depression. Cross-cultural validity was acceptable whether tested by language (Spanish vs. English) or ethnicity (Hispanic vs. other). This measure of yearning enables study of the epidemiology and prognostic value of this key feature of mourning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mothers who had more invested in their pregnancy, for example those who had thought of a name or bought things for the baby, also showed a higher level of grief-related yearning for the loss of the infant,39”
From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
(1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.1.22 · Cited by 736
The Perinatal Grief Scale: Development and initial validation.
Toedter, L. J., Lasker, J. N., & Alhadeff, J. M. (1988) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1988.tb01604.x · Cited by 297
Measuring grief: A short version of the perinatal grief scale
Potvin, L., Lasker, J., & Toedter, L. (1989) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf00962697 · Cited by 227
Major Depressive Disorder in the 6 Months After Miscarriage
Neugebauer, R. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540290035029 · Cited by 202
Self-citationDepressive symptoms in women in the six months after miscarriage
Neugebauer, R., Kline, J., O’Connor, P., Shrout, P., Johnson, J., Skodol, A., Wicks, J., & Susser, M. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91839-3 · Cited by 158
Self-citationGrief and Depression After Miscarriage: Their Separation, Antecedents, and Course
Beutel, M., Deckardt, R., von Rad, M., & Weiner, H. (1995) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199511000-00003 · Cited by 140
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.3928/0048-5713-19860501-06 · DOI
- Beutel, M., 1995, Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 45, 295
- Bowlby, J., 1980, Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression
- 10.1176/ajp.147.5.608 · DOI
- Clayton, P., 1982, Handbook of affective disorders
- Clayton, P. J., 1998, Adversity, stress, and psychopathology, 96, 10.1093/oso/9780195121926.003.0007 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0047358 · DOI · Paper page
- Elders, M. A., 1995, Issues in Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 67
- Jacobs, S., 1990, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 51, 269
- 10.2190/8QD0-W9R6-QX96-A5K3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01428.x · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114335 · DOI
- 10.1080/00332747.1986.11024331 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1978.tb02468.x · DOI
- Muller, M. E., 1992, Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 6, 5, 10.1891/0889-7182.6.1.5 · DOI
- 10.1176/ajp.137.9.1081 · DOI
- Neugebauer, R., 1987, The epidemiology of psychiatric disorders, 136
- 10.2105/AJPH.82.10.1332 · DOI
- 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb128375.x · DOI
- Osterweis, M., 1988, Mental health professionals and the bereaved
- 10.1080/00332747.1980.11024061 · DOI
- Phipps, S., 1981, Social Biology, 28, 1
- 10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1192/bjp.174.1.67 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/07399863980203006 · DOI
- Sanchez-Ayendez, M., 1988, Women & Health, 14, 239
- Shapiro, E. R., 1995, Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 1, 159
- 10.1192/bjp.166.5.583 · DOI
- Walsh, F., 1991, Living beyond loss: Death in the family
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112455 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004583-198907000-00001 · DOI
- 10.2307/1129668 · DOI
- 10.1176/ajp.139.12.1590 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90170-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Complicated grief after perinatal loss
Kersting, A., & Wagner, B. (2012) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2012.14.2/akersting · Cited by 419
Psychological morbidity following miscarriage
Lok, I. H., & Neugebauer, R. (2007) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.11.007 · Cited by 302
Self-citationGrief Following Miscarriage: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Brier, N. (2008) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0505 · Cited by 287
Affective disorders in the aftermath of miscarriage: A comprehensive review
Klier, C. M., Geller, P. A., & Ritsher, J. B. (2002) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-002-0146-2 · Cited by 176
Self-citationInfertility and Perinatal Loss: When the Bough Breaks
Bhat, A., & Byatt, N. (2016) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-016-0663-8 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritsher, J. B., & Neugebauer, R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Veterans Affairs and Stanford University
- New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University
- Venue
- Assessment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-40
- ISSN
- 1073-1911
- 1552-3489
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review