Cited by 28Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Testing and Assessment

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Scale Scores With Well-Established Psychopathology and Academic Achievement Measures in Adolescents With ADHD

Open access
Burns, G. Leonard, Becker, Stephen P.·2022·Assessment

Abstract

The convergent and discriminant validity of the parent version of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) symptom and impairment scale scores were evaluated with the scale scores from multiple methods including a semistructured diagnostic interview, rating scales, and an academic achievement test. Participants were 82 adolescents (70% male, 78% non-Hispanic White) aged 13 to 17 years ( M = 15.01) diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (77% predominantly inattentive presentation) and parents. CABI scale scores showed moderate ( rs = .42 to .49) to substantial ( rs = .62 to .91) convergent correlations with scores from similar measures. CABI scale scores also showed significant discriminant validity (convergent correlation significantly larger than discriminant correlation) with the scores on the other measures. These findings provide additional support for use of the CABI in research and clinical practice, and copies of the scale and norms are freely available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10731911211001929

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Başay O, Çiftçi E, Becker SP, & Burns GL (2021). Validity of sluggish cognitive tempo in Turkish children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s10578-020-01110-5 33432461 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Becker SP (2021). Systematic review: Assessment of sluggish cognitive tempo over the past decade. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychatry. Advance online publication. 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.10.016 PMC8099929 33166623 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Becker SP, Burns GL, Schmitt AP, Epstein JN, & Tamm L (2019). Toward establishing a standard symptom set for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo in children: Evidence from teacher ratings in a community sample. Assessment, 26(6), 1128– 1141. 10.1177/1073191117715732 28649849 PMC6309721 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Becker SP, Epstein JN, Tamm L, Tilford AA, Tischner CM, Isaacson PA, Simon JO, & Beebe DW (2019). Shortened sleep duration causes sleepiness, inattention, and oppositionality in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Findings from a crossover sleep restriction/extension study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(4), 433– 442. 10.1016/J.JAAC.2018.09.439 30768404 PMC6441371 · DOI
  5. Becker SP, & Fogleman ND (2020). Psychiatric co-occurrence (comorbidity) in adolescents with ADHD. In Becker SP (Ed.), ADHD in adolescents: Development, assessment, and treatment (pp. 170– 203). Guilford Press.
  6. Burns GL, & Becker SP (2019). Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD in nationally representative U.S. children: Empirical and clinical differentiation using categorical and dimensional approaches. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1080/15374416.2019.1678165 PMC7190416 31671271 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Burns GL, Becker SP, Servera M, Bernad MM, & García-Banda G (2017). Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in the home and school contexts: Parent and teacher invariance and cross-setting validity. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 209– 220. 10.1037/pas0000325 27148788 PMC6526025 · DOI
  8. Burns GL, Geiser C, Servera M, Becker SP, & Beauchaine TP (2020). Application of the bifactor S – 1 model to multi-source ratings of ADHD/ODD symptoms: An appropriate bifactor model for symptom ratings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(7), 881– 894. 10.1007/s10802-019-00608-4 31834589 PMC8017439 · DOI
  9. Burns GL, Preszler J, & Becker SP (2020). Psychometric and normative information on the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory in a nationally representative sample of United States children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1080/15374416.2020.1852943 PMC8272731 33428463 · DOI
  10. Burns GL, Servera M, & Becker SP (2021). Psychometric properties and initial normative information on the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory with mother, father, and teacher ratings of Spanish Children. Psicothema, 33(1), 139– 145. 10.7334/psicothema2020.267 33453747 · DOI
  11. Coxe S, Sibley MH, & Becker SP (2020). Presenting problem profiles for adolescents with ADHD: Differences by sex, age, race, and family adversity. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Advance online publication. 10.1111/camh.12441 33350581 · DOI
  12. Kaufman A, & Kaufman N (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT-2). Pearson Assessment.
  13. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, & Ryan N (1997). Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(7), 980– 988. 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021 9204677 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Koch T, Eid M, & Lochner K (2018). The psychometric foundation of the CFA-MTMM models. In Irving P, Booth T, & Hughes DJ (Eds.), Psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 781– 845). Wiley Blackwell.
  15. Litson K, Geiser C, Burns GL, & Servera M (2018). Trait and state variance in multi-informant assessments of ADHD and academic impairment in Spanish first-grade children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(5), 699– 712. 10.1080/15374416.2015.1118693 26890535 · DOI
  16. Navarro-Soria I, Servera M, & Burns G (2020). Association of foster care and its duration with clinical symptoms and impairment: Foster care versus non-foster care comparisons with Spanish children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(2), 526– 533. 10.1007/s10826-019-01596-1 · DOI
  17. Power TJ, Dombrowski SC, Watkins MW, Mautone JA, & Eagle JW (2007). Assessing children’s homework performance: Development of multi-dimensional, multi-informant rating scales. Journal of School Psychology, 45(3), 333– 348. 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.002 18516211 PMC1950125 · DOI
  18. Preszler J, Burns GL, Litson K, Geiser C, & Servera M (2017). Trait and state variance in oppositional defiant disorder symptoms: A multi-source investigation with Spanish children. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 135– 147. 10.1037/pas0000313 27148784 PMC5097702 · DOI
  19. Preszler J, Burns GL, Litson K, Geiser C, Servera M, & Becker SP (2019). How consistent is sluggish cognitive tempo across occasions, sources, and settings? Evidence from latent state–trait modeling. Assessment, 26(1), 99– 110. 10.1177/1073191116686178 28064528 PMC6050147 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Raykov T, & Marcoulides GA (2011). Introduction to psychometrics. Routledge.
  21. Seijas R, Servera M, Garcia-Banda G, Burns GL, Preszler J, Barry C, Litson K, & Geiser C (2019). Consistency of limited prosocial emotions across occasions, sources, and settings: Trait- or state-like construct in a young community sample? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(1), 47– 58. 10.1007/s10802-018-0415-9 29520586 · DOI
  22. Servera M, Sáez B, Burns GL, & Becker SP (2018). Clinical differentiation of sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(8), 818– 829. 10.1037/abn0000375 30265014 PMC6237634 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wechsler D (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Third edition (WIAT-III). Pearson.
  24. Wolraich ML, Lambert W, Doffing MA, Bickman L, Simmons T, & Worley K (2003). Psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent rating scale in a referred population. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28(8), 559– 567. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg046 14602846 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burns, G. L., & Becker, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Burns, G. Leonard
Venue
Assessment
Published
2021-03-23
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
1086-1098
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W3137199653
Cited by
28
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH109787 & K23MH108603)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adolescents, convergent validity, discriminant validity, parent report, academic performance, psychopathology, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review