Cited by 30Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Assessing sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in elementary students: empirical differentiation, invariance across sex and grade, and measurement precision

Open access
Becker, Stephen P., Mossing, Kandace W., Zoromski, Allison K., Vaughn, Aaron J., Epstein, Jeffery N., Tamm, Leanne, Burns, G. Leonard·2020·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

= 398) provided ratings of SCT, ADHD-IN, academic impairment, and social impairment. An a priori 2-factor model with cross-loadings found the SCT items to demonstrate excellent structural validity with ADHD-IN items. The measurement properties of the SCT and ADHD-IN constructs were also invariant across sex and grade. SCT and ADHD-IN were both uniquely associated with academic and social impairment. Graded response item response theory analysis indicated that the SCT and ADHD-IN scales provided a high level of information and precision. The current study replicates and extends previous research and provides the strongest psychometric evidence to date of teacher-rated SCT using the CABI. The teacher-report CABI may be especially useful in the school-based screening of SCT and ADHD-IN. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000946

Cites

26 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies found the association between SCT and global impairment/quality of life remained significant after covarying other psychopathology dimensions.

    “Importantly, numerous studies found this association remained significant when covarying other psychopathology dimensions.27,39,80,128,129”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results section reports that SCT remained significantly associated with social and academic impairment after controlling for ADHD inattention, sex, grade, and cohort. This paper reports one study, not numerous studies, and it did not assess global impairment or quality of life or control for other psychopathology dimensions beyond ADHD inattention. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SCT is associated with lower income/education, negative family environment, peer victimization, and interpersonal (but not non-interpersonal) trauma exposure.

    “A handful of studies investigated associations between SCT and psychosocial adversities, finding SCT to be associated with lower income/education,27,35,39,69 negative family environment,70 peer victimization,71 and interpersonal (but not non-interpersonal) trauma exposure.72”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The citation is attached to the lower income/education part of the sentence. The Results section on SCT and social and academic impairment reports associations with impairment, not family income or parental education; searches for income, parental education, and socioeconomic status found no passage addressing that association. The other adversities are attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Self-reported SCT is linked to poorer self-reported emotion regulation in children and adults.

    “Self-reported SCT has been linked to poorer self-reported emotion regulation among children19,24 and adults39,88,89,109,110”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods > Measure section describes teacher ratings of SCT and academic and social impairment, not self-reports of emotion regulation. The Discussion > Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions section names emotion regulation as a domain for future study. Searches for self-reported SCT and emotion regulation in children and adults found no passage reporting the claimed link; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Epidemiological studies find elevated SCT symptoms in 46% of adults with ADHD.

    “and 46% of adults with ADHD.39”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods > Participants section describes teacher ratings of students in grades 2–5, not adults with ADHD. Searches for “46%” and for elevated SCT symptoms in adults with ADHD found no passage reporting the claimed prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Becker SP, & Barkley RA (2018). Sluggish cognitive tempo. In Banaschewski T, Coghill D, & Zuddas A (Eds.), Oxford textbook of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (pp. 147– 153). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  2. Kline RB (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.
  3. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (1998–2019). Mplus user’s guide (Eigth ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, S. P., Mossing, K. W., Zoromski, A. K., Vaughn, A. J., Epstein, J. N., Tamm, L., & Burns, G. L.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2020-11
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1047-1056
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W3046261123
Cited by
30
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Grantee Submission
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Education (R305A160064)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH108603)
  • National Institutes of Health (5UL1TR001425-04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, teacher ratings, measurement invariance, sex differences, grade level differences, measurement precision, academic impairment, social dysfunction, school-based screening, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Confusion, Fantasy, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Sex Factors, Students, Lethargy, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review