Cited by 25Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychometric Methodologies and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

How consistent is sluggish cognitive tempo across occasions, sources, and settings? Evidence from latent state-trait modeling

Open access
Preszler, Jonathan, Burns, G. Leonard, Litson, Kaylee, Geiser, Christian, Servera, Mateu, Becker, Stephen P.·2019·Assessment

Abstract

Research has yet to determine how much of the variance in sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) symptom ratings is consistent across occasions, sources, and settings versus specific to occasion, source, and setting. Our first objective was to determine the amount of variance in SCT ratings that was consistent ( trait consistency) across three occasions of measurement over 12 months versus specific to the occasion ( occasion-specificity) with ratings by mothers, fathers, primary teachers, and secondary teachers of 811 Spanish children. Our second objective was then to determine the convergent validity for trait consistency and occasion-specificity variance components within and across settings. SCT ratings reflected mostly trait consistency for mothers, fathers, and primary teachers (less so for secondary teachers) with the convergent validity for trait consistency also being strong for mothers with fathers and for primary teachers with secondary teachers. Across home and school, however, convergent validity for trait consistency was low and even lower for occasion-specificity. SCT appears to be more trait-like rather than state-like, with similar levels of trait consistency across occasions and convergent validity within settings as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in a prior study. However, SCT symptoms had slightly weaker convergent validity for trait consistency across settings relative to ADHD symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191116686178

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCT elevations have been reported in children exposed prenatally to alcohol or maternal smoking, pediatric traumatic brain injury survivors, and youth with spina bifida.

    “SCT elevations were reported in children exposed prenatally to alcohol44,45 or maternal smoking,46 pediatric traumatic brain injury survivors,47 and youth with spina bifida.48”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    Citation 48 is attached to the claim about youth with spina bifida. The Study Objectives and Discussion examine the consistency of SCT ratings in Spanish children, but our copy does not report SCT elevations in youth with spina bifida; a search for “spina bifida” found no relevant passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Preszler, J., Burns, G. L., Litson, K., Geiser, C., Servera, M., & Becker, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Burns, G. Leonard
Venue
Assessment
Published
2017-01-08
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
99-110
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2571081537
Cited by
25
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MHI08603)
  • National Institutes of Drug Abuse (R01DA034770-01)
  • Ministerio de Econom�a y Competitividad (PSI2011-23252, PSI2014-52605-R)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, trait consistency, convergent validity, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, parent and teacher ratings
MeSH terms
Character, Child, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Reaction Time, Social Environment, Spain, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review