Cited by 76Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Structure of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20): A Meta-Analytic Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Open access
Schroeders, Ulrich, Kubera, Fiona, Gnambs, Timo·2022·Assessment

Abstract

Alexithymia is defined as the inability of persons to describe their emotional states, to identify the feelings of others, and a utilitarian type of thinking. The most popular instrument to assess alexithymia is the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Despite its widespread use, an ongoing controversy pertains to its internal structure. The TAS-20 was originally constructed to capture three different factors, but several studies suggested different factor solutions, including bifactor models and models with a method factor for the reversely keyed items. The present study examined the dimensionality of the TAS-20 using summary data of 88 samples from 62 studies (total N = 69,722) with meta-analytic structural equation modeling. We found support for the originally proposed three-dimensional solution, whereas more complex models produced inconsistent factor loadings. Because a major source of misfit stems from translated versions, the results are discussed with respect to generalizations across languages and cultural contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10731911211033894

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TAS-20 is the most widely used and reliable self-measurement for alexithymia.

    “The final criteria are used because TAS-20 is the most widely used and reliable self-measurement [38].”

    From Psychological Treatments for Alexithymia: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Toronto Alexithymia Scales section calls the TAS-20 the most popular measure, and the Abstract identifies it as a self-report measure. But the Abstract notes criticisms of its reliability, while Results > Confirmatory Factor Analyses reports reliability estimates that vary across its three factors. The source therefore supports its widespread use, not an unqualified description of it as reliable. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. *Anderson S. (2003). A stress-emotion skill model of adaptation: A study in the rubric of emotional intelligence [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong]. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/2124/
  2. *Chung U.-S. Rim H.‑D. Lee Y.‑H. Kim S.‑H. (2003). Comparison of reliability and validity of three Korean versions of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, 11(1), 77- 88.
  3. *Eiden T. C. (1998). Twenty item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Construct validity in a college student population [Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University]. Oklahoma State University Digital Archive. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/33514
  4. *Güleç H. Köse S. Güleç M. Y. Çitak S. Evren C. Borckardt J. Sayar K. (2009). Reliability and factorial validity of the Turkish version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 19(3), 214- 220.
  5. *Kamm J. S. G. (2016). High alexithymia in Chilean indigenous and Hispanic adolescent population: A cross cultural study [Doctoral dissertation, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen]. Giessener Elektronische Bibliothek. http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2017/13373/
  6. *La-Salete Rocha Nunes J. (2011). Estudo das qualidades psicométricas da Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto (20 itens) numa amostra portuguesa de adolescentes [Study of the psychometric qualities of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (20 items) in a Portuguese sample of adolescents] [Doctoal dissertation, Universidade do Porto]. Repositório Aberto. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/162558983.pdf
  7. *Louth S. M. (1998). Alexithymia and the capacity to evaluate states of affect and pain [Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia]. UBC Library Open Collections. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/831/items/1.0088755

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schroeders, U., Kubera, F., & Gnambs, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (DE)
Corresponding author
Schroeders, Ulrich
Venue
Assessment
Published
2021-07-26
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1806-1823
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W3160648549
Cited by
76
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (cc-by)
Funders
American Psychological Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Toronto Alexithymia Scale, TAS-20, alexithymia, factor structure, dimensionality, bifactor model, methodological factors, cross-cultural generalizability, emotional awareness
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Language, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review