Cited by 127Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decision Making in Children With ADHD Only, ADHD-Anxious/Depressed, and Control Children Using a Child Version of the Iowa Gambling Task

Garon, Nancy, Moore, Chris, Waschbusch, Daniel A.·2006·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to investigate decision making in children with ADHD using a child version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). The effect of internalizing symptoms is also of interest. METHOD: Twenty-one children with ADHD (high anxiety/depression and no anxiety/depression) are compared to an age- and sex-matched control group on the gambling task. Children in the ADHD-alone group demonstrate impaired performance on the IGT. In contrast, children in the control group and the ADHD-anxiety/depression group learn to choose more from the advantageous decks over time. RESULTS: These findings of impaired decision making in children with ADHD parallel findings of real-life decision-making problems in this population. CONCLUSION: Furthermore, the findings suggest that having a high number of internalizing symptoms leads to better performance for children with ADHD on this variant of the IGT.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054705284501

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bradshaw, J., 2001, Developmental disorders of the frontostriatal system: Neuropsychological, neuropsychiatry and evolutionary perspectives. Brain damage, behaviour and cognition series
  3. Damasio, A., 1994, Descartes’ error
  4. Gray, J., 2000, The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hipocampal system
  5. Johansen, E. B., 2002, Behavioral Brain Science, 130, 37
  6. NIMH-DISC Editorial Board, 1999, The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children
  7. Wechsler, D., 1991, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garon, N., Moore, C., & Waschbusch, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Garon, Nancy
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2006-05
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
607-619
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2040968114
Cited by
127
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, decision-making, Iowa Gambling Task, internalizing problems, anxiety, depression, children, risk assessment, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Decision Making, Depression, Female, Gambling, Humans, Iowa, Male, Socioeconomic Factors, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review