Cited by 56Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Decision Making with Uncertain Reinforcement in Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Drechsler, Renate, Rizzo, Patrizia, Steinhausen, Hans-Christoph·2010·Child Neuropsychology

Abstract

Reward-related processes are impaired in children with ADHD. Whether these deficits can be ascribed to an aversion to delay or to an altered responsiveness to magnitude, frequency, valence, or the probability of rewards still needs to be explored. In the present study, children with ADHD and normal controls aged 7 to 10 years performed a simple probabilistic discounting task. They had to choose between alternatives where the magnitude of rewards was inversely related to the probability of outcomes. As a result, children with ADHD opted more frequently for less likely but larger rewards than normal controls. Shifts of the response category after positive or negative feedback, however, occurred as often in children with ADHD as in control children. In children with ADHD, the frequency of risky choices was correlated with neuropsychological measures of response time variability but unrelated to measures of inhibitory control. It is concluded that the tendency to select less likely but larger rewards possibly represents a separate facet of dysfunctional reward processing, independent of delay aversion or altered responsiveness to feedback.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09297040903190774

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behaviorally, individuals with ADHD display a range of motivational deficits, including impaired behavioral modification in response to rewards, enhanced motivation for larger but riskier rewards, and decreased motivation for social rewards.

    “behaviorally, individuals with ADHD display a range of motivational deficits, including impaired behavioral modification in response to rewards [468], enhanced motivation for larger but riskier rewards [479], and decreased motivation for social rewards [480].”
  • On the MMG, both children with ADHD and NCs did not change their strategy during task progression and switched set equally often following positive or negative feedback.

    “Both groups did not change their strategy during task progression and switched set equally often following positive or negative feedback.”
  • Two studies found no differences in the number of switches after negative or positive feedback in the MMG between children with ADHD and NCs.

    “Lastly, two other studies found no differences in the number of switches after negative or positive feedback in the MMG between children with ADHD and NCs [40], [48].”
  • Four of fourteen studies with children/adolescents used an explicit gambling task and two (50%) found that children/adolescents with ADHD performed in a more risky fashion than NCs.

    “Four of the fourteen studies with children/adolescents used an explicit gambling task and two studies (2/4 = 50%) found that children/adolescents with ADHD performed in a more risky fashion than NCs [40], [58].”
  • On the MMG, children with ADHD had a greater preference for conditions with a low probability large reward than NCs (four-card selections; Cohen's d = 1.20).

    “Drechsler et al. [40] developed the MMG and demonstrated that children with ADHD had a greater preference for conditions with a low probability large reward, than NCs (four-card selections; Cohen’s d = 1.20).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drechsler, R., Rizzo, P., & Steinhausen, H.-C.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Drechsler, Renate
Venue
Child Neuropsychology
Published
2009-10-09
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
145-161
ISSN
  • 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-4136
OpenAlex
W1995156059
Cited by
56
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, decision-making, reward processing, probabilistic discounting, decision making under risk, delay aversion, reaction time variability, inhibitory control, feedback, children
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Decision Making, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Risk-Taking, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review