Cited by 143Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The Relationship Between Executive Function Deficits and DSM -5-Defined ADHD Symptoms

Silverstein, Michael J., Faraone, Stephen V., Leon, Terry L., Biederman, Joseph, Spencer, Thomas J., Adler, Lenard A.·2020·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the relationship between the core Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) ADHD symptoms and executive function deficits (EFDs), to evaluate ADHD characteristics of those with executive dysfunction (ED), and to examine the predictive utility of the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) in identifying those with adult ADHD and ED. Method : Two samples (referred and primary care practice) were pooled together for present analysis. Results : Final analysis included 297 respondents, 171 with adult ADHD. Spearman correlation coefficients and binary logistic regressions demonstrated that ADHD inattentive (IA) and hyperactive-impulsive (H-I) symptoms were moderately to strongly correlated with and highly predictive of EFDs. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an AISRS DSM 18-item score of ⩾ 28 was most predictive of clinical ED. Conclusion : ADHD symptoms were strongly correlated with and predictive of EFDs, clinicians should screen adults with ADHD for EFDs and ADHD treatment providers should track EFD improvement in addition to DSM-5 ADHD symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054718804347

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comparison between clinical and control groups revealed clear differences in cognitive indices linked to executive functioning, consistent with previous research.

    “First, the comparison between the clinical and control groups revealed clear differences in cognitive indices linked to executive functioning, consistent with previous research [35, 44, 45, 46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverstein, M. J., Faraone, S. V., Leon, T. L., Biederman, J., Spencer, T. J., & Adler, L. A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Adler, Lenard A.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2018-10-08
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
41-51
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2898034871
Cited by
143
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • DataStat, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI
  • New York University School of Medicine (Office of Industrial Liaison)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
executive dysfunction, adult ADHD, inattentive symptoms, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, symptom screening, treatment outcome monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review