Cited by 371Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Efficacy of meta-cognitive therapy for adult ADHD

Open access
Solanto, Mary V., Marks, David J., Wasserstein, Jeanette, Mitchell, Katherine, Abikoff, Howard, Alvir, Jose Ma. J., Kofman, Michele D.·2010·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the efficacy of a 12-week manualized meta-cognitive therapy group intervention designed to enhance time management, organization, and planning in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Eighty-eight clinically referred adults who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD according to clinical and structured diagnostic interviews and standardized questionnaires were stratified by ADHD medication use and otherwise randomly assigned to receive meta-cognitive therapy or supportive psychotherapy in a group modality. Meta-cognitive therapy uses cognitive-behavioral principles and methods to impart skills and strategies in time management, organization, and planning and to target depressogenic and anxiogenic cognitions that undermine effective self-management. The supportive therapy condition controlled for nonspecific aspects of treatment by providing support while avoiding discussion of cognitive-behavioral strategies. Therapeutic response was assessed by an independent (blind) evaluator via structured interview before and after treatment as well as by self-report and collateral informant behavioral ratings. RESULTS: General linear models comparing change from baseline between treatments revealed statistically significant effects for self-report, collateral report, and independent evaluator ratings of DSM-IV inattention symptoms. In dichotomous indices of therapeutic response, a significantly greater proportion of members of the meta-cognitive therapy group demonstrated improvement compared with members of the supportive therapy group. Logistic regression examining group differences in operationally defined response (controlling for baseline ADHD severity) revealed a robust effect of treatment group (odds ratio=5.41; 95% CI=1.77-16.55). CONCLUSIONS: Meta-cognitive therapy yielded significantly greater improvements in dimensional and categorical estimates of severity of ADHD symptoms compared with supportive therapy. These findings support the efficacy of meta-cognitive therapy as a viable psychosocial intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081123

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [11]McDermott SP Wilens TE Brown T Cognitive therapy for adults with ADHD Attention deficit disorders and comorbidities in children, adolescents, and adults Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press 2000 569 606
  2. [19]Knouse LE Sprich S Cooper-Vince C Safren SA ADHD symptom profiles in medication-treated adults entering a psychosocial treatment program Journal of ADHD and Related Disorders 2009 1 34 47 PMC4607083 26478756
  3. [25]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders- Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, 11/2002 revision) New York, N.Y. 10032 Biometrics Research Department; New York State Psychiatric Institute 1051 Riverside Drive - Unit 60 2002
  4. [26]First MB Gibbon M Spitzer RL Williams JBW Benjamin LS Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Persontlity Disorders (SCID-II) Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solanto, M. V., Marks, D. J., Wasserstein, J., Mitchell, K., Abikoff, H., Alvir, J. M. J., & Kofman, M. D.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-08-01
Volume
167
Issue
8
Pages
958-968
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2106508714
Cited by
370
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 34
FWCI
20.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r34mh071721-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R34 MH071721, 1R34MH071721)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
adult ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, group therapy, time management, inattentive symptoms, supportive therapy, psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, ADHD medication use, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review