The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect
Abstract
Repetition has been shown to increase subjective truth ratings of trivia statements. This truth effect can be measured in two ways: (a) as the increase in subjective truth from the first to the second encounter ( within-items criterion) and (b) as the difference in truth ratings between repeated and other new statements ( between-items criterion). Qualitative differences are assumed between the processes underlying both criteria. A meta-analysis of the truth effect was conducted that compared the two criteria. In all, 51 studies of the repetition-induced truth effect were included in the analysis. Results indicate that the between-items effect is larger than the within-items effect. Moderator analyses reveal that several moderators affect both effects differentially. This lends support to the notion that different psychological comparison processes may underlie the two effects. The results are discussed within the processing fluency account of the truth effect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, repeating myths might contribute to increasing their acceptance due to their perceived familiarity [22, 23, 24].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“This happens, at least partly, because people tend to mistake repetition for truth, a phenomenon known as the “illusory truth” effect [22, 23].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803 · Cited by 3,792
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 · Cited by 3,149
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545 · DOI
- Dechêne, A., 2005, Hängt die Wahrheit von der Formulierung ab? Einflüsse von syntaktischer Veränderung und Verarbeitungstiefe auf den truth effect [Influence of syntactical changes and level of processing on the truth effect]. Unpublished master’s thesis
- Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth effect and faith in intuition]
- Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth judgments under processing constraints]
- Doland, C.A., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1879
- Hurtt, R.K., 1999, Sceptical about scepticism: Instrument development and experimental validation
- Kim, C., 2002, Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1913A
- Law, S., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 0191
- Mutter, S.A., 1995, Aging and Cognition, 2, 89
- 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 590
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2014) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800284-1.00002-3 · Cited by 54
Fluency and positivity as possible causes of the truth effect
Unkelbach, C., Bayer, M., Alves, H., Koch, A. S., & Stahl, C. (2010) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.015 · Cited by 51
Self-citationPantazi, M., Kissine, M., & Klein, O. (2018) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2018.36.2.167 · Cited by 57
Only half of what i’ll tell you is true: Expecting to encounter falsehoods reduces illusory truth.
Jalbert, M. C., Schwarz, N., & Newman, E. J. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.010 · Cited by 49
The role of cognitive biases in conspiracy beliefs: A literature review
Gagliardi, L. (2023) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12604 · Cited by 57
The effects of repetition on belief in naturalistic settings.
Fazio, L. K., Pillai, R. M., & Patel, D. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001211 · Cited by 53
Pehlivanoglu, D., Lighthall, N. R., Lin, T., Kevin, J., Polk, R. J., Perez, E., Cahill, B. S., & Ebner, N. C. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000426 · Cited by 52
The Effect of Repetition on Truth Judgments Across Development
Fazio, L. K., & Sherry, C. L. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620939534 · Cited by 54
Silva, R. R., Garcia‐Marques, T., & Mello, J. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0692-7 · Cited by 45
Initial judgment task and delay of the final validity-rating task moderate the truth effect
Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2013) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.002 · Cited by 42
Is Earth a perfect square? Repetition increases the perceived truth of highly implausible statements
Lacassagne, D., Béna, J., & Corneille, O. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105052 · Cited by 44
Kim, K., & Sin, S. J. (2015) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.11.001 · Cited by 51
Vogel, T., Silva, R. R., Thomas, A., & Wänke, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000731 · Cited by 40
Self-citationSchwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. C. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429295379-7 · Cited by 44
From Low-Choice to High-Choice Media Environments
Strömbäck, J., Boomgaarden, H. G., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003111474-3 · Cited by 47
Hilbig, B. E. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.009 · Cited by 48
Sundar, A., Kardes, F. R., & Wright, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1045154 · Cited by 38
Ahmed, S., & Rasul, M. E. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42614-z · Cited by 45
Claypool, H. M., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12179 · Cited by 36
Health misinformation: what it is, why people believe it, how to counter it
Nan, X., Thier, K., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2023.2225489 · Cited by 42
Calvillo, D. P., & Smelter, T. J. (2020) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00257-y · Cited by 40
Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?
Murphy, G., Loftus, E. F., Grady, R. H., Levine, L. J., & Greene, C. M. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917 · Cited by 35
Kirkpatrick, A. W. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520966165 · Cited by 34
Judging the Truth-Value of a Statement In and Out of a Deep Processing Context
Garcia‐Marques, T., Silva, R. R., & Mello, J. (2016) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2016.34.1.40 · Cited by 33
Believing that Humans Swallow Spiders in Their Sleep
Marsh, E. J., Cantor, A. D., & Brashier, N. M. (2015) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2015.09.003 · Cited by 36
A call to think broadly about information literacy.
Marsh, E. J., & Yang, B. W. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.012 · Cited by 34
Interdisciplinary Lessons Learned While Researching Fake News
Sample, C., Jensen, M. J., Scott, K. M., McAlaney, J., Fitchpatrick, S., Brockinton, A., Ormrod, D., & Ormrod, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537612 · Cited by 38
Ecker, U. K. H., Sharkey, C. X. M., & Swire‐Thompson, B. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281140 · Cited by 39
When contradictions foster persuasion: An attributional perspective
Reich, T., & Tormala, Z. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.004 · Cited by 32
The phenomenology of Aha-experiences.
Skaar, Ø. O., & Reber, R. (2019) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000138 · Cited by 35
The moral repetition effect: Bad deeds seem less unethical when repeatedly encountered.
Effron, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001214 · Cited by 44
The Public’s Perceptions of Government Officials’ Communication in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Bickham, S. B., & Francis, D. B. (2021) · Journal of Creative Communications · doi:10.1177/09732586211003856 · Cited by 31
What Makes News Sharable on Social Media?
Chen, X., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2023) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2023.007 · Cited by 38
Winters, M., Oppenheim, B., Sengeh, P., Jalloh, M. B., Webber, N., Pratt, S., Leigh, B., Mölsted-Alvesson, H., Zeebari, Z., Sundberg, C. J., et al. (2021) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006954 · Cited by 34
Good Things Don’t Come Easy (to Mind)
Hilbig, B. E. (2011) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000124 · Cited by 30
Bizzotto, N., de Bruijn, G., & Schulz, P. J. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16404-1 · Cited by 33
Principles of Model Specification in ANOVA Designs
Rouder, J. N., Schnuerch, M., Haaf, J. M., & Morey, R. D. (2022) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-022-00132-7 · Cited by 29
Scholl, S., Greifeneder, R., & Bless, H. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1805 · Cited by 30
Nisbet, E. C., & Kamenchuk, O. (2021) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edab011 · Cited by 33
van der Linden, S., Albarracín, D., Fazio, L. K., Freelon, D., Roozenbeek, J., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2023) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e506432023-001 · Cited by 34
When the unlikely becomes likely: Qualifying language does not influence later truth judgments.
Stanley, M. L., Yang, B. W., & Marsh, E. J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.08.004 · Cited by 30
Barrow, N. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00454-1 · Cited by 27
Tomaszewski, T., Morales, A., Lourentzou, I., Caskey, R. N., Liu, B., Schwartz, A., & Chin, J. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/30451 · Cited by 29
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondPreprint
Pennycook, G. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j3w7d · Cited by 27
How explicit warnings reduce the truth effect: A multinomial modeling approach
Calio, F., Nadarevic, L., & Musch, J. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103185 · Cited by 27
The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differences in the truth effect
Schnuerch, M., Nadarevic, L., & Rouder, J. N. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01814-8 · Cited by 26
Getting to the source of the illusion of consensus
Desai, S. C., Xie, B., & Hayes, B. K. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105023 · Cited by 31
Taddeo, G., Torres, B. D. F., & López, M. C. A. (2022) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c72-2022-01 · Cited by 30
Hancock, T. D., Breazeale, M. J., Adams, F. G., & Hardman, H. E. (2022) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-12-2021-3756 · Cited by 31
The Misinformation Receptivity Framework
Zmigrod, L., Burnell, R., & Hameleers, M. (2023) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000498 · Cited by 33
Dong, Y., Zhang, L., Lam, C., & Huang, Z. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.108098 · Cited by 29
Inverted U-shaped model: How frequent repetition affects perceived risk
Xi, L., Xie, X., & Liu, L. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004629 · Cited by 26
The synchronization of collective beliefs: From dyadic interactions to network convergence.
Vlasceanu, M., Morais, M. J., Duker, A., & Coman, A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000265 · Cited by 25
Accuracy and Social Motivations Shape Judgements of (Mis)InformationPreprint
Rathje, S., Roozenbeek, J., Bavel, J. J. V., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hkqyv · Cited by 26
Easy to Retrieve but Hard to Believe
O’Brien, E. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612461359 · Cited by 26
Morgan, J. C., & Cappella, J. N. (2023) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2023.2192013 · Cited by 28
Familiarity increases subjective positive affect even in non-affective and non-evaluative contexts
Garcia‐Marques, T., Prada, M., & Mackie, D. M. (2016) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9555-9 · Cited by 25
Jiang, Y., & Hong, J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.004 · Cited by 24
Xu, Y., Wong, R., He, S., Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01046-0 · Cited by 24
The myth of pulmonary metastasectomy
Macbeth, F. R., & Fallowfield, L. J. (2020) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0927-2 · Cited by 24
Zhen, L., Yan, B., Tang, J. L., Nan, Y., & Yang, A. (2022) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2022.2139031 · Cited by 24
Repetition could increase the perceived truth of conspiracy theories
Béna, J., Rihet, M., Carreras, O., & Terrier, P. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02276-4 · Cited by 32
Arendt, F., Haim, M., & Beck, J. (2019) · Publizistik · doi:10.1007/s11616-019-00484-4 · Cited by 24
Challenges in Processes of Validation and Comprehension
Singer, M. (2019) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2019.1598167 · Cited by 23
Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect
Buczel, K. A., Szyszka, P. D., Siwiak, A., Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267463 · Cited by 22
Confidence in one’s social beliefs: Implications for belief justification
Koriat, A., & Adiv, S. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.08.008 · Cited by 23
Foreign language reduces the longevity of the repetition-based truth effect
Nadarevic, L., Plier, S., Thielmann, I., & Darancó, S. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.019 · Cited by 22
Kümpel, A. S., & Unkel, J. (2020) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000261 · Cited by 27
Can confidence help account for and redress the effects of reading inaccurate information?
Salovich, N. A., Donovan, A. M., Hinze, S. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01096-4 · Cited by 24
Conceptual metaphors, processing fluency, and aesthetic preference
Zhang, L., Atari, M., Schwarz, N., Newman, E. J., & Afhami, R. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104247 · Cited by 27
Loev, S. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03749-0 · Cited by 24
The Ethics of Terminology: Can We Use Human Terms to Describe AI?
Deroy, O. D. (2023) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-023-09934-1 · Cited by 21
Edmond, G., & Martire, K. A. (2019) · Modern Law Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12424 · Cited by 21
Pillai, R. M., Fazio, L. K., & Effron, D. A. (2023) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976231180578 · Cited by 29
Storm, B. C., & Soares, J. S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.82 · Cited by 22
The redundancy in cumulative information and how it biases impressions.
Alves, H., & Mata, A. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000169 · Cited by 21
Estimating and Penalizing Preference Shift in Recommender Systems
Carroll, M., Hadfield-Menell, D., Russell, S., & Dragan, A. (2021) · Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3460231.3478849 · Cited by 20
Verbal persuasion in marketing: A multimethod meta-analysis of analytical and narrative processing
Orazi, D. C., Hamby, A. M., Herhausen, D., van Laer, T., Ludwig, S., Gonsalves, C., & Grewal, D. (2025) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-025-01095-4 · Cited by 26
Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections
Prike, T., Blackley, P., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00492-z · Cited by 24
Polarity and attitude effects in the continued-influence paradigm
Gordon, A., Ecker, U. K. H., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.104028 · Cited by 20
How Psychedelics Modulate Multiple Memory Mechanisms in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Doss, M. K., DeMarco, A., Dunsmoor, J. E., Cisler, J. M., Fonzo, G. A., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2024) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-024-02106-4 · Cited by 24
Is it all about the feeling? Affective and (meta-)cognitive mechanisms underlying the truth effect
Stump, A., Rummel, J., & Voß, A. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01459-1 · Cited by 19
Monetary incentives do not reduce the repetition-induced truth effect
Speckmann, F., & Unkelbach, C. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02046-0 · Cited by 21
Effects of Repeated Corrections of Misinformation on Organizational Trust: More is Not Always Better
Denner, N., Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2022) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2022.2135098 · Cited by 22
Baden, C., & David, Y. (2017) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443717734404 · Cited by 23
Schnepf, J., Lux, A., Jin, Z., & Formanowicz, M. (2021) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x211044789 · Cited by 18
Designing and detecting lies by reasoning about other agents.
Oey, L. A., Schachner, A., & Vul, E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001277 · Cited by 19
Crowdsourcing Judgments of News Source QualityPreprint
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3118471 · Cited by 19
Lerner, A. J., & Leslie, S. (2013) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12034 · Cited by 18
Rasul, M. E., & Ahmed, S. (2023) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines11030586 · Cited by 23
“That’s just like, your opinion, man”: the illusory truth effect on opinions
Riesthuis, P., & Woods, J. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01845-5 · Cited by 22
So, J., & Song, H. (2023) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqad025 · Cited by 21
Ryffel, F., & Wirth, W. (2015) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000257 · Cited by 19
Credibilidad e implicaciones éticas de las redes sociales para los jóvenes
Torres, B. D. F., Rodríguez, A. P., & del Roció, M. (2021) · Revista Latina de Comunicación Social · doi:10.4185/rlcs-2021-1512 · Cited by 20
Murray, S. F., Stanley, M. L., McPhetres, J., Pennycook, G., & Seli, P. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9evzc · Cited by 21
Fake News: O Que É, Como Se Faz E Por Que Funciona?Preprint
Forster, R., de Carvalho, R. M., Filgueiras, A., & Avila, E. (2021) · doi:10.1590/scielopreprints.3294 · Cited by 29
A potential new front in health communication to encourage vaccination: Health education teachers
Plutzer, E., & Warner, S. (2021) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.050 · Cited by 17
Dai, S.-C., Hsu, Y.-L., Xiong, A., & Ku, L. (2022) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539205 · Cited by 18
Mattavelli, S., Corneille, O., & Unkelbach, C. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001170 · Cited by 19
Bernard, S., Proust, J., & Clément, F. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01412 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dechêne, Alice
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-257
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2122617296
- Semantic Scholar
- 3a37a0a8ae8e464fac13aceb53dc2a63dcbd0969
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- truth effect, repetition, processing fluency, comparison processes
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Communication, Humans, Judgment, Memory, Truth Disclosure, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review