The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect
Abstract
Repetition has been shown to increase subjective truth ratings of trivia statements. This truth effect can be measured in two ways: (a) as the increase in subjective truth from the first to the second encounter ( within-items criterion) and (b) as the difference in truth ratings between repeated and other new statements ( between-items criterion). Qualitative differences are assumed between the processes underlying both criteria. A meta-analysis of the truth effect was conducted that compared the two criteria. In all, 51 studies of the repetition-induced truth effect were included in the analysis. Results indicate that the between-items effect is larger than the within-items effect. Moderator analyses reveal that several moderators affect both effects differentially. This lends support to the notion that different psychological comparison processes may underlie the two effects. The results are discussed within the processing fluency account of the truth effect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, repeating myths might contribute to increasing their acceptance due to their perceived familiarity [22, 23, 24].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“This happens, at least partly, because people tend to mistake repetition for truth, a phenomenon known as the “illusory truth” effect [22, 23].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803 · Cited by 3,792
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 · Cited by 3,149
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545 · DOI
- Dechêne, A., 2005, Hängt die Wahrheit von der Formulierung ab? Einflüsse von syntaktischer Veränderung und Verarbeitungstiefe auf den truth effect [Influence of syntactical changes and level of processing on the truth effect]. Unpublished master’s thesis
- Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth effect and faith in intuition]
- Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth judgments under processing constraints]
- Doland, C.A., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1879
- Hurtt, R.K., 1999, Sceptical about scepticism: Instrument development and experimental validation
- Kim, C., 2002, Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1913A
- Law, S., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 0191
- Mutter, S.A., 1995, Aging and Cognition, 2, 89
- 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007 · Cited by 1,360
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000465 · Cited by 1,268
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12476 · Cited by 879
Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth.
Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000098 · Cited by 598
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
van der Linden, S. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6 · Cited by 570
Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Loewen, P. J., Owen, T., Ruths, D. A., Teichmann, L., & Zhilin, O. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-028 · Cited by 419
The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source
Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008 · Cited by 436
When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review
Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310367640 · Cited by 420
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000085 · Cited by 389
Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H. G., Strömbäck, J., Vliegenthart, R., Damstra, A., & Lindgren, E. (2020) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2020.1759443 · Cited by 362
The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.
Swire‐Thompson, B., Ecker, U. K. H., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000422 · Cited by 315
Reminders and Repetition of Misinformation: Helping or Hindering Its Retraction?
Ecker, U. K. H., Hogan, J. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014 · Cited by 276
Brashier, N. M., & Marsh, E. J. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807 · Cited by 288
Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies
Pluviano, S., Watt, C., & Della Sala, S. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181640 · Cited by 273
The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect
Hassan, A., & Barber, S. J. (2021) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00301-5 · Cited by 315
Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388 · Cited by 275
Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095 · Cited by 227
Thoughts on how to think (and talk) about RNA structure
Vicens, Q., & Kieft, J. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2112677119 · Cited by 215
Political Psychology in the Digital (mis)Information age: A Model of News Belief and Sharing
Van Bavel, J. J., Harris, E. A., Pärnamets, P., Rathje, S., Doell, K. C., & Tucker, J. A. (2021) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12077 · Cited by 213
Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01651-4 · Cited by 228
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Fenton, O., & Martin, K. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x · Cited by 200
Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210386238 · Cited by 208
Self-citationUnderstanding How Prior Knowledge Influences Memory in Older Adults
Umanath, S., & Marsh, E. J. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614535933 · Cited by 216
The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition.
Marsh, E. J., & Rajaram, S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001 · Cited by 186
Truth by Repetition: Explanations and Implications
Unkelbach, C., Koch, A. S., Silva, R. R., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419827854 · Cited by 208
Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments
Kahn, B. E. (2016) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.11.004 · Cited by 200
Schwarz, N., Jalbert, M. C., Noah, T., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1067 · Cited by 209
Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories
Pierre, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362 · Cited by 202
The effectiveness of short‐format refutational fact‐checks
Ecker, U. K. H., O’Reilly, Z., Reid, J. S., & Chang, E. P. (2019) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12383 · Cited by 197
Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D., & Folse, J. A. G. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00735-1 · Cited by 202
keersmaecker, J. D., Dunning, D. A., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., Sanchez, C. J., Unkelbach, C., & Roets, A. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219853844 · Cited by 180
The Epistemic Status of Processing Fluency as Source for Judgments of Truth
Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2010) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0039-7 · Cited by 187
Helpful or Harmful? How Frequent Repetition Affects Perceived Statement Credibility
Koch, T., & Zerback, T. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12063 · Cited by 186
Effron, D. A., & Raj, M. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619887896 · Cited by 169
Bias in Favor of the Status Quo
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.x · Cited by 172
A referential theory of the repetition-induced truth effect
Unkelbach, C., & Rom, S. C. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.016 · Cited by 164
An initial accuracy focus prevents illusory truth
Brashier, N. M., Eliseev, E. D., & Marsh, E. J. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104054 · Cited by 159
Reading is believing: The truth effect and source credibility
Henkel, L. A., & Mattson, M. E. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.018 · Cited by 141
Kliegr, T., Bahník, Š., & Fürnkranz, J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103458 · Cited by 139
Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation
Caled, D., & Silva, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-021-00118-8 · Cited by 190
Peter, C., & Koch, T. (2016) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547015613523 · Cited by 124
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265 · Cited by 169
An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Online Health Misinformation
Pan, W., Liu, D., & Fang, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268 · Cited by 131
The entertainment value of conspiracy theories
van Prooijen, J., Ligthart, J., Rosema, S., & Xu, Y. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12522 · Cited by 131
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Chadwick, M. (2020) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00241-6 · Cited by 131
On Known Unknowns: Fluency and the Neural Mechanisms of Illusory Truth
Wang, W., Brashier, N. M., Wing, E. A., Marsh, E. J., & Cabeza, R. E. L. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00923 · Cited by 111
Validity judgments of rumors heard multiple times: the shape of the truth effect
DiFonzo, N., Beckstead, J., Stupak, N., & Walders, K. (2016) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2015.1137224 · Cited by 93
Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information
Rathje, S., Roozenbeek, J., Bavel, J. J. V., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01540-w · Cited by 150
Individual Representation in a Community of Knowledge
Rabb, N., Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.011 · Cited by 109
Altay, S., de Araujo, E., & Mercier, H. (2021) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1941163 · Cited by 120
Nadarevic, L., Reber, R., Helmecke, A. J., & Köse, D. (2020) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00251-4 · Cited by 119
Mix me a list: Context moderates the truth effect and the mere-exposure effect
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.019 · Cited by 97
Self-citationFoster, J. L., Huthwaite, T., Yesberg, J. A., Garry, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.004 · Cited by 93
Wänke, M., & Hansen, J. (2015) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414561766 · Cited by 93
Self-citationThe illusory truth effect: A review of how repetition increases belief in misinformation
Udry, J., & Barber, S. J. (2024) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101736 · Cited by 87
Propaganda, Misinformation, and the Epistemic Value of Democracy
Brown, É. (2018) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2018.1575007 · Cited by 86
Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173 · Cited by 87
The illusory truth effect leads to the spread of misinformation
Vellani, V., Zheng, S., Ercelik, D., & Sharot, T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105421 · Cited by 83
Greifeneder, R., Jaffé, M. E., Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429295379 · Cited by 114
Experiential fluency and declarative advice jointly inform judgments of truth
Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.010 · Cited by 85
From Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in their Reporting
Egelhofer, J. L., Aaldering, L., Eberl, J., Galyga, S., & Lecheler, S. K. (2020) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2020.1745667 · Cited by 92
Unveiling the truth: warnings reduce the repetition-based truth effect
Nadarevic, L., & Aßfalg, A. (2016) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0777-y · Cited by 78
Advice as a form of social influence: Informational motives and the consequences for accuracy
Rader, C. A., Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12329 · Cited by 87
Consumer skepticism towards CSR messages
Zhang, L., & Hanks, L. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-11-2015-0666 · Cited by 79
Parents’ beliefs in misinformation about vaccines are strengthened by pro-vaccine campaigns
Pluviano, S., Watt, C. A., Ragazzini, G., & Sala, S. D. (2019) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-019-00919-w · Cited by 74
Repetition Increases Perceived Truth Even for Known Falsehoods
Fazio, L. K. (2020) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.347 · Cited by 87
Helpfulness of Online Review Content: The Moderating Effects of Temporal and Social Cues
Huang, L., Tan, C.-H., Ke, W., & Wei, K. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00499 · Cited by 70
de Bellis, E., Hildebrand, C., Ito, K., Herrmann, A. P., & Schmitt, B. H. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243719867698 · Cited by 70
Koch, A. S., & Forgas, J. P. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.006 · Cited by 74
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond
Pennycook, G. (2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.11.003 · Cited by 95
The effects of repeating false and misleading information on belief
Pillai, R. M., & Fazio, L. K. (2021) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1573 · Cited by 81
Social Media News Use and COVID-19 Misinformation Engagement: Survey Study
Ahmed, S., & Rasul, M. E. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/38944 · Cited by 86
Spinoza’s error: Memory for truth and falsity
Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0251-z · Cited by 66
Wahlheim, C. N., Alexander, T. R., & Peske, C. D. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620952797 · Cited by 67
Truthiness, the illusory truth effect, and the role of need for cognition
Newman, E. J., Jalbert, M. C., Schwarz, N., & Ly, D. P. (2020) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102866 · Cited by 64
Zhang, Y., Chen, F., & Lukito, J. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2113844 · Cited by 71
When trust comes easy: Articulatory fluency increases transfers in the trust game
Zürn, M., & Topolinski, S. (2017) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.02.016 · Cited by 63
Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation
Pantazi, M., Hale, S. A., & Klein, O. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12797 · Cited by 81
Hearing a statement now and believing the opposite later
Garcia‐Marques, T., Silva, R. R., Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.015 · Cited by 60
Keshavarz, H. (2020) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-03-2020-0033 · Cited by 81
Repetition increases both the perceived truth and fakeness of information: An ecological account
Corneille, O., Mierop, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104470 · Cited by 57
Truthiness and falsiness of trivia claims depend on judgmental contexts.
Newman, E. J., Garry, M., Unkelbach, C., Bernstein, D. M., Lindsay, D. S., & Nash, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000099 · Cited by 69
ALIED: Humans as adaptive lie detectors.
Street, C. N. H. (2015) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.06.002 · Cited by 63
FeedReflect: A Tool for Nudging Users to Assess News Credibility on Twitter
Bhuiyan, M., Zhang, K., Vick, K., Horning, M., & Mitra, T. (2018) · CSCW Companion · doi:10.1145/3272973.3274056 · Cited by 66
Thagard, P. R. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190678722.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Construal-level mind-sets and the perceived validity of marketing claims
Wright, S. A., Manolis, C., Brown, D., Guo, X., Dinsmore, J. B., Chiu, C.-Y. P., & Kardes, F. R. (2011) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-011-9151-4 · Cited by 57
Silva, R. R., Chrobot, N., Newman, E. J., Schwarz, N., & Topolinski, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200 · Cited by 56
The Trajectory of Truth: A Longitudinal Study of the Illusory Truth Effect
Henderson, E. L., Simons, D. J., & Barr, D. J. (2021) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.161 · Cited by 65
People with Easier to Pronounce Names Promote Truthiness of Claims
Newman, E. J., Sanson, M., Miller, E. K., Quigley‐McBride, A., Foster, J. L., Bernstein, D. M., & Garry, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088671 · Cited by 66
Silva, R. R., Garcia‐Marques, T., & Reber, R. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.016 · Cited by 59
Mere repetition increases belief in factually true COVID-19-related information.
Unkelbach, C., & Speckmann, F. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.02.001 · Cited by 59
Leach, S., Piazza, J. R., Loughnan, S., Sutton, R. M., Kapantai, I., Dhont, K., & Douglas, K. M. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935 · Cited by 64
Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency.
Brashier, N. M., Umanath, S., Cabeza, R. E. L., & Marsh, E. J. (2017) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000156 · Cited by 59
The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of “fake news”
Michael, R. B., & Breaux, B. O. (2021) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00278-1 · Cited by 60
A Closer Look at Social Psychologists’ Silver Bullet
Bless, H., & Burger, A. M. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615621278 · Cited by 56
Toward a Dose-Response Account of Media Priming
Arendt, F. (2013) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650213482970 · Cited by 52
A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect
Henderson, E. L., Westwood, S. J., & Simons, D. J. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01995-w · Cited by 68
Social Cognition in the Internet Age: Same As It Ever Was?
Sparrow, B., & Chatman, L. (2013) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2013.827079 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dechêne, Alice
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-257
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2122617296
- Semantic Scholar
- 3a37a0a8ae8e464fac13aceb53dc2a63dcbd0969
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- truth effect, repetition, processing fluency, comparison processes
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Communication, Humans, Judgment, Memory, Truth Disclosure, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review