The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect
Abstract
Repetition has been shown to increase subjective truth ratings of trivia statements. This truth effect can be measured in two ways: (a) as the increase in subjective truth from the first to the second encounter ( within-items criterion) and (b) as the difference in truth ratings between repeated and other new statements ( between-items criterion). Qualitative differences are assumed between the processes underlying both criteria. A meta-analysis of the truth effect was conducted that compared the two criteria. In all, 51 studies of the repetition-induced truth effect were included in the analysis. Results indicate that the between-items effect is larger than the within-items effect. Moderator analyses reveal that several moderators affect both effects differentially. This lends support to the notion that different psychological comparison processes may underlie the two effects. The results are discussed within the processing fluency account of the truth effect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, repeating myths might contribute to increasing their acceptance due to their perceived familiarity [22, 23, 24].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“This happens, at least partly, because people tend to mistake repetition for truth, a phenomenon known as the “illusory truth” effect [22, 23].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803 · Cited by 3,792
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 · Cited by 3,149
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545 · DOI
- Dechêne, A., 2005, Hängt die Wahrheit von der Formulierung ab? Einflüsse von syntaktischer Veränderung und Verarbeitungstiefe auf den truth effect [Influence of syntactical changes and level of processing on the truth effect]. Unpublished master’s thesis
- Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth effect and faith in intuition]
- Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth judgments under processing constraints]
- Doland, C.A., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1879
- Hurtt, R.K., 1999, Sceptical about scepticism: Instrument development and experimental validation
- Kim, C., 2002, Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1913A
- Law, S., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 0191
- Mutter, S.A., 1995, Aging and Cognition, 2, 89
- 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 590
Ly, D. P., Newman, E. J., & Bernstein, D. M. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2154805 · Cited by 7
Lisi, M. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230417 · Cited by 11
Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (2020) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000493 · Cited by 7
Statistically Controlling for Processing Fluency Reduces the Aesthetic-Usability Effect
Preßler, J., Schmid, L., & Hurtienne, J. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585739 · Cited by 5
Pan, W., & Hu, T.-Y. (2024) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2024.2363366 · Cited by 5
True and Moral by Repetition: Unveiling the Impact of Exposure on Positive Stereotypes Perception
Mattavelli, S., Bianchi, C., Brambilla, M., & Motterlini, M. (2024) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.933 · Cited by 7
Meta Learning Based Deception Detection from Speech
Mansbach, N., & Azaria, A. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13010626 · Cited by 6
Corbu, N., Bârgăoanu, A., Udrea, G., & Gavrilescu, M. (2023) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/05390184231205174 · Cited by 8
Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news
Kemp, P. L., Sinclair, A. H., Adcock, R. A., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2024) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00546-w · Cited by 6
Truth-by-repetition across languages.
keersmaecker, J. D., Unkelbach, C., & Roets, A. (2024) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/mac0000175 · Cited by 5
Bröder, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_17 · Cited by 6
Familiarity with visual stimuli boosts recency bias in macaques
Brunet, N. M., & Jagadeesh, B. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.8105 · Cited by 4
Are there costs to using incorrect worked examples in mathematics education?
Pillai, R. M., Loehr, A. M., Yeo, D. J. S., Hong, M. K., & Fazio, L. K. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.007 · Cited by 6
Donner, W. R., Rodríguez, H., Brotzge, J. A., & Diaz, W. R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05031-2_3 · Cited by 5
Béna, J., Carreras, O., & Terrier, P. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tf76n · Cited by 5
Lisi, M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hx4r3 · Cited by 5
Older adults and online health misinformation: a systematic literature review
Hu, H., Jin, G., & Zhang, X. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04714-z · Cited by 5
The limited use of the fluency heuristic: Converging evidence across different procedures
POHL, R. F., Erdfelder, E., Michalkiewicz, M., Castela, M., & Hilbig, B. E. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0622-y · Cited by 4
Werewolf on campus: A case study in inoculation theory and gamified one-shot library instruction
Adams, A. D. (2023) · Public & Access Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15228959.2023.2252322 · Cited by 6
The Effect of Correcting Neuromyths on Students’ and Teachers’ Later Reasoning
Lithander, M. P. G., Geraci, L. D., Karaca, M., & Hunsberger, R. (2024) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence12100098 · Cited by 6
Google allows advertisers to target the sensitive informational queries of cancer patients
Zenone, M. A., Marcon, A. R., Kenworthy, N., van Schalkwyk, M. C., Caulfield, T., Hartwell, G., & Maani, N. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-170 · Cited by 10
Modeling the link between the plausibility of statements and the truth effect
Aktepe, S. C., & Heck, D. W. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02647-z · Cited by 6
The press and government, influencers of citizens’ political opinions: A quasi-experiment on Brexit
Roşu, M.-M., Fiscutean, A., & Păun, M. (2023) · Journal of Policy Modeling · doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.11.007 · Cited by 4
The relevance of syntactic complexity for truth judgments: A registered report
Schmidt, O., & Heck, D. W. (2023) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103623 · Cited by 5
Primacy effects in the formation of environmental attitudes: The case of mineral exploration
Poluektova, O., Julienne, H., Robertson, D. A., Braiden, A., & Lunn, P. D. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102248 · Cited by 3
Henderson, E. L., Vallée‐Tourangeau, F., & Simons, D. J. (2019) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.192 · Cited by 5
Social Bots – Meinungsroboter im Netz
Neis, M., & Mara, M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_17 · Cited by 4
Epistemic value in the subpersonal vale
Carter, J. A., & Rupert, R. D. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02631-1 · Cited by 4
Does having a voice disorder hurt credibility?
Schroeder, S. R., Rembrandt, H. N., May, S., & Freeman, M. R. (2020) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106035 · Cited by 4
‘Coronavirus as a political weapon’
Koca-Helvacı, Z. C. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.96.08koc · Cited by 4
Rahmanian, E., & Esfidani, M. R. (2022) · Journal of Creative Communications · doi:10.1177/09732586221116464 · Cited by 5
Battista, F., Luke, T. J., Curci, A., & Lanciano, T. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04806-8 · Cited by 4
Kurtenbach, S., Küchler, A. C. D., & Zick, A. (2024) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/10780874241259423 · Cited by 4
Simulating Personal Wealth in the Laboratory
Brandt, A. E., & Martin, J. (2015) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2015.1060937 · Cited by 4
Kognitive Verzerrungen und die Irrationalität des Denkens
Weber, S., & Knorr, E. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_10 · Cited by 4
Harmful events and misconducts in financial organizations: Human biases and root causes
Faugère, C., & Stul, O. (2021) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101382 · Cited by 5
The Ocean of Possible Truth. Drivers and Consequences of News Accuracy Judgements OnlinePreprint
von Hohenberg, B. C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3281038 · Cited by 4
Kepplinger, H. M., & Zerback, T. (2013) · Studies in Communication and Media · doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2012-3-4 · Cited by 4
Conspiracy Theories: A Cultural Evolution Theory approachPreprint
Stubbersfield, J. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/hqkju · Cited by 4
keersmaecker, J. D., Dunning, D. A., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., Sanchez, C. J., Unkelbach, C., & Roets, A. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n7bze · Cited by 4
Schmidt, O., & Heck, D. W. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rdegq · Cited by 3
Aesthetic Considerations in the Development of Plate Tectonics
Miyata-Sturm, M. E. (2024) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.004 · Cited by 3
Stump, A., Wüstenberg, T., Rouder, J. N., & Voß, A. (2025) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-025-01266-4 · Cited by 3
The persuasive potential of AI-paraphrased information at scale
Dash, S., Xu, Y., Jalbert, M. C., & Spiro, E. S. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf207 · Cited by 6
Ye, S., Attali, D., Ghazi, M., Cachia, A., Cassotti, M., & Borst, G. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70041-x · Cited by 7
Hybrid Reality: The Rise of Deepfakes and Diverging Truths
Meckel, M., & Steinacker, L. (2021) · Morals & Machines · doi:10.5771/2747-5182-2021-1-10 · Cited by 3
Landwehr, J. R., Winkler, S., & Bornemann, T. (2022) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506221105375 · Cited by 4
An ongoing secondary task can reduce the illusory truth effect
Ly, D. P., Bernstein, D. M., & Newman, E. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215432 · Cited by 3
Repeating Statements Increases Source Credibility
Mattavelli, S., Brambilla, M., & Unkelbach, C. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251347420 · Cited by 6
Moral Memories and Identity Protection
Brigard, F. D., & Stanley, M. L. (2021) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2021.2004817 · Cited by 3
Superman Takes a Taxi: Testing Theories of Validation with Inconsistencies in Fantastic Narratives
Saerys-Foy, J., LoCasto, P. C., Burn, D. J., & Ferranti, D. (2022) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2021.1994298 · Cited by 3
Evidence for Spinozan “Unbelieving” in the Right Inferior Prefrontal Cortex
Bernhard, R. M., Frankland, S., Plunkett, D., Sievers, B., & Greene, J. D. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01964 · Cited by 5
Communities of Knowledge in Trouble
Rabb, N., Geana, M. V., & Sloman, S. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231187997 · Cited by 4
The Politics of Sexual Misconduct Allegations: A Memory Science Framework
Miller, Q. C., London, K., & Loftus, E. F. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29148-7_23 · Cited by 3
Are you sure? Examining the potential benefits of truth-checking as a learning activity
Arcos, K., Hausman, H., & Storm, B. C. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231206813 · Cited by 3
Item-method directed forgetting and perceived truth of news headlines
Abel, M., & Bäuml, K. T. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2023.2267191 · Cited by 3
Are Women Brave or Braver Than Men? Judgments of Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Comparisons
Lux, A., Bruckmüller, S., & Hoorens, V. (2023) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x231210513 · Cited by 3
Naugle, D. A., Tibbels, N. J., Dosso, A., Benié, W., & Nana, M. (2023) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.021 · Cited by 3
False information is harder to debunk after gist repetitions than verbatim repetitions
Gratton, C., Béghin, G., Gagnon‐St‐Pierre, É., & Markovits, H. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2024.2314975 · Cited by 3
Illusions of knowledge due to mere repetition
Speckmann, F., & Unkelbach, C. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105791 · Cited by 6
Santos, A. S., Ramos, T., Garcia‐Marques, L., & Carneiro, P. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12365 · Cited by 3
Self-Censorship: Emerging Themes and Remaining Questions
Sharvit, K. (2017) · Peace psychology book series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63378-7_13 · Cited by 3
Children’s Informant Judgments and Recall of Valenced Facts at a Science Center
Marble, K. E., Caporaso, J. S., Bettencourt, K. M., Boseovski, J. J., Pathman, T., Marcovitch, S., & Scales, M. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659633 · Cited by 3
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (2021) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2021.39.6.687 · Cited by 3
Béna, J., Rouard, M., & Corneille, O. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4134 · Cited by 6
Moisoglou, I., Katsiroumpa, A., Konstantakopoulou, O., Yfantis, A., Galani, O., Tsiachri, M., Peleka, P., Katsiroumpa, Z., & Galanis, P. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14040425 · Cited by 2
What is remembered?: The recall of health-related information in cyberchondria and health anxiety
Bagarić, B., Martinčević, M., & Vranić, A. (2022) · Psihologija · doi:10.2298/psi220127019b · Cited by 3
The Role of Valence Matching in the Truth-by-Repetition Effect
Béna, J., Mierop, A., Bancu, D., Unkelbach, C., & Corneille, O. (2023) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2023.41.2.193 · Cited by 2
How do managers use MD&A disclosures to respond to negative news?
Liu, L., Geng, H.-X., & Wang, Y.-T. (2025) · China Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100405 · Cited by 6
Hundt, G. M., & Seta, J. J. (2025) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2025.2482018 · Cited by 2
Bell, R., Nadarevic, L., Mieth, L., & Buchner, A. (2025) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-025-00628-3 · Cited by 3
Can Blockchain-Based Authenticity Disclosures Increase Consumer Trust in Online Advertising?
Antsipava, D., van Reijmersdal, E. A., Strycharz, J., & van Noort, G. (2025) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2025.2510233 · Cited by 5
Wahlheim, C. N., Kemp, P. L., Wiley, R. W., & Engelhardt, A. (2025) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01760-7 · Cited by 3
Multinomial models of the repetition-based truth effect: Investigating the role of prior knowledge
Schmidt, O., & Heck, D. W. (2026) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01821-x · Cited by 3
FAKE NEWS IN SOCIAL NETWORKS AS A MANIPULATIVE TOOL OF INFORMATION WARFARE
Batrymenko, O., & Nelipa, D. V. (2022) · Visnyk of the Lviv University · doi:10.30970/pps.2022.45.10 · Cited by 2
Judging Online Health Misinformation: Effects of Cyberchondria and Age
Xiang, H., Zhou, J., & Liu, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_22 · Cited by 2
Stubbersfield, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.72 · Cited by 5
Lee, S., Choung, H., Peng, T., Lapinski, M. K., Jang, Y., & Turner, M. M. (2024) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2024.2354252 · Cited by 2
Consequences of distinguishing anthropomorphism from animism in experimental manipulations
Karpińska-Krakowiak, M. (2024) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-024-09761-3 · Cited by 2
‘In Our Blood’: Archaeology and ‘Indigeneity’ in the British National Party’s Magazine Identity
Richardson, L.-J. (2024) · Public Archaeology · doi:10.1080/14655187.2025.2505375 · Cited by 3
Matthias, C., Benn, Y., & Harkin, B. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323436 · Cited by 2
Orchinik, R., Bhui, R., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62462-x · Cited by 2
Assessing the truth effect’s reliability and test–retest stability
Calio, F., Nadarevic, L., & Musch, J. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103923 · Cited by 2
Hybrid Reality: The Rise of Deepfakes and Diverging Truths
Meckel, M., & Steinacker, L. (2021) · Morals & Machines · doi:10.5771/2747-5174-2021-1-10 · Cited by 2
Utility and use of accuracy cues in social learning of crowd preferences
Lim, J., & Lee, S. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240997 · Cited by 1
Impact of the Illusory Truth Effect and Location of Testimony in Juror Deliberations
Johnston, A., Ambrosini, D., & Losier, B. J. (2021) · International Journal of Risk and Recovery · doi:10.15173/ijrr.v4i1.4339 · Cited by 2
Mere Exposure Effect Is Sometimes Insensitive to Mood Inductions
Molet, M., Craddock, P., Osroff, A. J., Li, P., Livingston, T. L., & Miller, R. R. (2021) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000514 · Cited by 6
Jin, L., Xiao, R., & Wang, H. (2016) · International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications · doi:10.1504/ijica.2016.077581 · Cited by 2
Sasaki, K., Kobayashi, M., Nakamura, K., & Watanabe, K. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.201791 · Cited by 1
Nonprobative Photos Inflate the Truthiness and Falsiness of Claims
Newman, E. J. (2013) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17003764.v1 · Cited by 2
Mattavelli, S., Béna, J., Corneille, O., & Unkelbach, C. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5mwpz · Cited by 2
Prediction-comprehension bias: Successful prediction can promote an illusory sense of comprehensionPreprint
Grüning, D. J., & Mata, A. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2k5wg · Cited by 2
SAĞLIK MEZENFORMASYONU: ÇEVRİMİÇİ KANALLARDAN YAYILAN YANLIŞ BİLGİ SALGINI
Büyükafşar, M. (2021) · Öneri Dergisi · doi:10.14783/maruoneri.990944 · Cited by 1
O’Donnell, R., Chan, J. C. K., Foster, J. L., & Garry, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1201674 · Cited by 1
Belief-consistent information is most shared despite being the least surprising
Goebel, J. T., Susmann, M. W., Parthasarathy, S., Gamal, H. E., Garrett, R., & Wegener, D. T. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56086-2 · Cited by 5
Claypool, H. M., Garcia‐Marques, T., Silva, R. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197763414.013.11 · Cited by 1
Bröder, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-68476-4_18 · Cited by 1
Cognitive biases and research miscitations
Simmering, M. J., Fuller, C. M., Leonard, S. R., & Simmering, V. R. (2024) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12589 · Cited by 2
The Elephant in the Room: Prior Exposure to Misinformation and Correction Effect
Wang, T., & Yu, W. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241305654 · Cited by 2
Gabriel, N. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2463057 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dechêne, Alice
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-257
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2122617296
- Semantic Scholar
- 3a37a0a8ae8e464fac13aceb53dc2a63dcbd0969
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- truth effect, repetition, processing fluency, comparison processes
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Communication, Humans, Judgment, Memory, Truth Disclosure, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review