CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 592Memory Processes and InfluencesDeception detection and forensic psychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect

Dechêne, Alice, Stahl, Christoph, Hansen, Jochim, Wänke, Michaela·2010·Personality and Social Psychology Review
DOI 10.1177/1088868309352251
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Repetition has been shown to increase subjective truth ratings of trivia statements. This truth effect can be measured in two ways: (a) as the increase in subjective truth from the first to the second encounter ( within-items criterion) and (b) as the difference in truth ratings between repeated and other new statements ( between-items criterion). Qualitative differences are assumed between the processes underlying both criteria. A meta-analysis of the truth effect was conducted that compared the two criteria. In all, 51 studies of the repetition-induced truth effect were included in the analysis. Results indicate that the between-items effect is larger than the within-items effect. Moderator analyses reveal that several moderators affect both effects differentially. This lends support to the notion that different psychological comparison processes may underlie the two effects. The results are discussed within the processing fluency account of the truth effect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868309352251

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545 · DOI
  4. Dechêne, A., 2005, Hängt die Wahrheit von der Formulierung ab? Einflüsse von syntaktischer Veränderung und Verarbeitungstiefe auf den truth effect [Influence of syntactical changes and level of processing on the truth effect]. Unpublished master’s thesis
  5. Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth effect and faith in intuition]
  6. Dechêne, A., 2006, [Truth judgments under processing constraints]
  7. Doland, C.A., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1879
  8. Hurtt, R.K., 1999, Sceptical about scepticism: Instrument development and experimental validation
  9. Kim, C., 2002, Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1913A
  10. Law, S., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 0191
  11. Mutter, S.A., 1995, Aging and Cognition, 2, 89
  12. 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–590 of 590

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Dechêne, Alice
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-12-18
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
238-257
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
DOI
10.1177/1088868309352251
OpenAlex
W2122617296
Semantic Scholar
3a37a0a8ae8e464fac13aceb53dc2a63dcbd0969
Cited by
592
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
truth effect, repetition, processing fluency, comparison processes
MeSH terms
Cognition, Communication, Humans, Judgment, Memory, Truth Disclosure, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review