The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors: A Review of Research and Theory
Abstract
We review research and theory on the HEXACO personality dimensions of Honesty-Humility (H), Agreeableness (A), and Emotionality (E), with particular attention to the following topics: (1) the origins of the HEXACO model in lexical studies of personality structure, and the content of the H, A, and E factors in those studies; (2) the operationalization of the H, A, and E factors in the HEXACO Personality Inventory–Revised; (3) the construct validity of self-reports on scales measuring the H factor; (4) the theoretical distinction between H and A; (5) similarity and assumed similarity between social partners in personality, with a focus on H and A; (6) the extent to which H (and A and E) variance is represented in instruments assessing the “Five-Factor Model” of personality; and (7) the relative validity of scales assessing the HEXACO and Five-Factor Model dimensions in predicting criteria conceptually relevant to H, A, and E.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6 · Cited by 5,265
Further Examining the American Dream: Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296223006 · Cited by 2,745
Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294907 · Cited by 2,171
Self-citationPersonality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores.
Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116 · Cited by 1,068
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016 · Cited by 830
Self-citationExtension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality.
Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.781 · Cited by 707
Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings
SAROGLOU, V., PICHON, I., TROMPETTE, L., VERSCHUEREN, M., & DERNELLE, R. (2005) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x · Cited by 449
The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model.
Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T., & Lockwood, P. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017159 · Cited by 290
Implicit self-concept and moral action
Perugini, M., & Leone, L. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.015 · Cited by 169
Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., Maples, J., & Price, J. (2011) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191111411671 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis
Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000226 · Cited by 855
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000111 · Cited by 519
Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view
Porter, T., & Schumann, K. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2017.1361861 · Cited by 314
The multicultural orientation framework: A narrative review.
Davis, D. E., DeBlaere, C., Owen, J., Hook, J. N., Rivera, D. P., Choe, E., Van Tongeren, D. R., Worthington, E. L., & Placeres, V. (2018) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/pst0000160 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02-26
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-152
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2131907295
- Cited by
- 891
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 59.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors: A Review of Research and Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1088868314523838
- The paper
- Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors: A Review of Research and Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.