Cited by 1,380Psychometric Methodologies and TestingBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?

Doty, D. Harold, Glick, William H.·1998·Organizational Research Methods

DOI 10.1177/109442819814002

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Methods variance and its effects are at the center of a debate in organizational science. Most of the debate, however, is focused on the prevalence of common methods variance and ignores common methods bias, or the divergence between observed and true relationships among constructs. This article assesses the level of common methods bias in all multitrait-multimethod correlation matrices published over a 12-year period in a set of six social science journals using a combination of structural equation modeling and meta-analysis. The results indicate that only 46% of the variation in measures is attributable to the constructs, that 32% of the observed variation in measures is attributable to common methods variance, and that common methods variance results in a 26% bias in the observed relationships among constructs. This level of bias is cause for concern but does not invalidate many research findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/109442819814002

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,933
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392563 · Cited by 4,372
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03396-0 · Cited by 2,564
Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey
Spector, P. E. (1985) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00929796 · Cited by 2,188
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462 · Cited by 1,616
Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances.
Land, K. C., & Hayduk, L. A. (1990) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579660 · Cited by 1,313
Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing
Phillips, L. W. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800401 · Cited by 1,276
Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect.
Crampton, S. M., & Wagner, J. A. (1994) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.67 · Cited by 1,224
Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across StudiesMeta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies, by HunterJohn E., SchmidtFrank L., and JacksonGregg B. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publications, 1982, 176 pp., $17.95 cloth, $8.95 paper
Feldman, J. M., Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258247 · Cited by 1,203
Expectations and Norms in Models of Consumer Satisfaction
Cadotte, E. R., Woodruff, R. B., & Jenkins, R. L. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151641 · Cited by 1,169
Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data
Widaman, K. F. (1985) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168500900101 · Cited by 1,037
A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research
Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90022-1 · Cited by 971
Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?
Spector, P. E. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.438 · Cited by 956
Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.
Öneş, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660 · Cited by 924
An Examination of Need-Satisfaction Models of Job Attitudes
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392182 · Cited by 849
The Measurement of Job Characteristics
Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., & Keller, R. T. (1976) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255772 · Cited by 805
Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1175263 · Cited by 792
Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies
Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151642 · Cited by 750
Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress?
Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, J. M., Robinson, B. S., & Webster, J. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.193 · Cited by 748
THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†
Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963) · British Journal of Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x · Cited by 737
Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis.
King, B. F., Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1976) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2285784 · Cited by 644
The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing Channels
John, G., & Reve, T. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378201900412 · Cited by 632
International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Ford, J. K. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470773277 · Cited by 613
Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.547 · Cited by 612
On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis
Seidler, J. (1974) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094155 · Cited by 603
A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research
Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000207 · Cited by 581
Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales.
Eden, D., & Leviatan, U. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.60.6.736 · Cited by 535
An Approach for Confirmatory Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling of Organizational Properties
Anderson, J. C. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.4.525 · Cited by 453
Divergence between Archival and Perceptual Measures of the Environment: Causes and Consequences
Boyd, B., Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A. M. A. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1993.3997514 · Cited by 434
Relation of job stressors to affective, health, and performance outcomes: A comparison of multiple data sources.
Spector, P. E., Dwyer, D. J., & Jex, S. M. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.11 · Cited by 419
Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains.
Chen, P. Y., & Spector, P. E. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.398 · Cited by 400
An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1994) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.323 · Cited by 386
The job characteristics approach to task design: A critical review.
Roberts, K. H., & Glick, W. H. (1981) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.193 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health.
Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.46 · Cited by 316
Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement
Schmitt, N. (1994) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030150504 · Cited by 314
Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices
Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168601000101 · Cited by 311
The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance.
Lawler, E. E. (1967) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025095 · Cited by 304
An Evaluation of the Validity of Correlational Research Conducted in Organizations
Mitchell, T. R. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277939 · Cited by 279
The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing Channels
John, G., & Reve, T. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151724 · Cited by 272
The Nature and Effects of Method Variance in Organizational Research
Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. Τ. (1995) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 261
Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.
Holzbach, R. L. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579 · Cited by 249
Time urgency: The construct and its measurement.
Landy, F. J., Rastegary, H., Thayer, J. F., & Colvin, C. A. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.644 · Cited by 227
METHOD VERSUS SUBSTANCE: HOW STRONG ARE UNDERLYING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN JOB CHARACTERISTICS AND ATTITUDINAL OUTCOMES?
Glick, W. H., Jenkins, G. D., & Gupta, N. (1986) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256218 · Cited by 218
Self-citation
Path analysis: Psychological examples.
Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0029778 · Cited by 187
Generalizability theory: 1973–1980
Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1981) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1981.tb00625.x · Cited by 165
Measures of Organizational Structure: A Methodological Note
Pennings, J. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225590 · Cited by 163
Validation of the Index of Organizational Reaction with the JDI, the MSQ, and Faces Scales.
Dunham, R. B., SMITH, F. J., & Blackburn, R. S. (1977) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255415 · Cited by 154
Convergent and discriminant validities of corresponding Job Descriptive Index and Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire scales.
Gillet, B., & Schwab, D. P. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076751 · Cited by 146
The construct validity of burnout
Meier, S. T. (1984) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00163.x · Cited by 141
Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances
Wardrop, J. L., Hayduk, L. A., & Bollen, K. A. (1993) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165186 · Cited by 127
UNDERSTANDING TECHNOLOGY-STRUCTURE RELATIONSHIPS: THEORY DEVELOPMENT AND META-ANALYTIC THEORY TESTING.
Miller, C. C., Glick, W. H., Wang, Y.-D., & Huber, G. P. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256447 · Cited by 122
Self-citation
Response format of the Job Descriptive Index: Assessment of reliability and validity by the multitrait–multimethod matrix.
Johnson, S. M., Smith, P. C., & Tucker, S. M. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.4.500 · Cited by 109
An exercise design approach to understanding assessment center dimension and exercise constructs.
Schneider, J. R., & Schmitt, N. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.32 · Cited by 108
Research Notes. THE MEASUREMENT OF PERCEIVED JOB CHARACTERISTICS: THE JOB DIAGNOSTIC SURVEY VERSUS THE JOB CHARACTERISTIC INVENTORY.
Pierce, J. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1978) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255668 · Cited by 106
A comparison of the behaviorally anchored rating and mixed standard scale formats.
Dickinson, T. L., & Zellinger, P. M. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.2.147 · Cited by 105
Alternative Questionnaire Formats for Country Image Studies
Jaffe, E. D., & Nebenzahl, I. D. (1984) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151472 · Cited by 102
Generalizability Theory: A Comprehensive Method for Assessing and Improving the Dependability of Marketing Measures
Rentz, J. O. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400102 · Cited by 101
Construct Validity of Three Types of Organizational Citizenship behavior: An Illustration of the Direct Product Model with Refinements
Becker, T. E., & Vance, R. J. (1993) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(93)90010-k · Cited by 87
Work, nonwork, and withdrawal.
Youngblood, S. A. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.106 · Cited by 83
Institutional Versus Questionnaire Measures of Organizational Structure.
Sathe, V. (1978) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255756 · Cited by 78
Estimation Problems in the Block-Diagonal Model of the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix
Brannick, M. Τ., & Spector, P. E. (1990) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169001400401 · Cited by 74
Construct validity of multiple job performance measures using confirmatory factor analysis.
Vance, R. J., MacCallum, R. C., Coovert, M. D., & Hedge, J. W. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.74 · Cited by 74
INFLUENCE OF QUALITY OF WORK LIFE ON COMPANY AND UNION COMMITMENT.
Fields, M., & Thacker, J. W. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256382 · Cited by 74
Validation of an S-O-R Model for Situation, Enduring, and Response Components of Involvement
Arora, R. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151723 · Cited by 74
The job characteristics model in Hong Kong.
Birnbaum, P. H., Farh, J., & Wong, G. Y. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.598 · Cited by 68
Productivity in organizations: new perspectives from industrial and organizational psychology
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-4561 · Cited by 68
Developing More Encompassing Theories About Organizations: The Centralization-Effectiveness Relationship as an Example
Huber, G. P., Miller, C. C., & Glick, W. H. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.1.11 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Leader-group interactions: A longitudinal field investigation.
Greene, C. N., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.50 · Cited by 53
Construct Validity of Three Types of Organizational Citizenship behavior: An Illustration of the Direct Product Model with Refinements
Becker, T. E., & Vance, R. J. (1993) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639301900309 · Cited by 52
Generalizability Theory: A Comprehensive Method for Assessing and Improving the Dependability of Marketing Measures
Rentz, J. O. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151750 · Cited by 47
A test of the correspondence between self-reports and alternative data sources about work organizations
Gupta, N., & Beehr, T. A. (1982) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(82)90058-6 · Cited by 46
Additive and multiplicative method effects in applied psychological research: An empirical assessment of three models
Becker, T. E. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90006-x · Cited by 46
Creating Models of the Strategic Decision Making Process Via Participant Recall: A Free Simulation Examination
Wolfe, J., & Jackson, C. N. (1987) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638701300110 · Cited by 39
On Priming, Consistency, and Order Effects in Job Attitude Assessment: With a Note on Current Research
Salancik, G. R. (1984) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638401000209 · Cited by 34
Additive and Multiplicative Method Effects in Applied Psychological Research: An Empirical Assessment of Three Models
Becker, T. E., & Cote, J. A. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000306 · Cited by 28
Measuring member satisfaction with the Church.
Silverman, W. H., Pargäment, K. I., Johnson, S., Echemendía, R. J., & Snyder, S. E. (1983) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.664 · Cited by 19
The measurement of shop‐floor job satisfaction: The convergent and discriminant validity of the Worker Opinion Survey
Soutar, G. N., & WEAVER, J. R. (1982) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1982.tb00075.x · Cited by 12
THE CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITIES BETWEEN THE IOR AND THE JDI: ENGLISH AND SPANISH FORMS.
McCabe, D. J., Dalessio, A., Briga, J., & Sasaki, J. (1980) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255565 · Cited by 12
Effects of relationships among task positions on job characteristics, interpersonal variables, and employee satisfaction and performance
Brass, D. J. (1979) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 3
Attribution processes in the use of performance feedback in an organization
Fichman, M. (1982) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 7

10.1177/002224378702400307 · DOI
Campbell, D. T., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 93
Doty, D. H., Annual Meetings of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Doty, D. H., National Meetings of the Academy of Management
Fiske, D. W., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 77
10.2307/256218 · DOI
Hackman, J. R., 1980, Work redesign

Sorted by citations

Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · Cited by 15,744
“In addition, they note that complex, abstract questions among the systematic error variance components, thereby increasing the bias in the observed relationships between constructs” (Doty & Glick 1998, p. 381). accurate responses is item ambiguity.”
Influential
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
“The second source of data and the second level of analysis were added to avoid method artifacts caused by using only one single method or to find relations (within the individual) that can be predicted by merely applying principles of cognitive consistency (Doty & Click, 1998).”
Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556658 · Cited by 3,592
Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?
Spector, P. E. (2006) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428105284955 · Cited by 3,445
“Doty and Glick (1988) discussed the nature of methods, providing a taxonomy that classified measures along a facet of measurement technique versus data source.”
BackgroundMethod
The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.
Steel, P. (2007) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65 · Cited by 3,417

See all 1,380

Authors: Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H.
Affiliations: Syracuse University (US)
Arizona State University (US)
ORCID: Doty, D. Harold
Venue: Organizational Research Methods
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 1998-10
Volume: 1
Issue: 4
Pages: 374-406
ISSN: 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
1552-7425
DOI: 10.1177/109442819814002
OpenAlex: W2168082050
Cited by: 1,380
References: 84
Citations by year: 2026: 37 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 92
FWCI: 9.20
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords: measurement bias, construct relationships, measurement error, organizational analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks