The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Service Research Priorities: Designing Sustainable Service Ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
This article utilizes input from service scholars, practitioners, reviews of published literature, and influential policy documents to identify service research priorities that push the boundaries of extant research. In a companion piece, we focused on four service research priorities related to managing and delivering service in turbulent times. Further, we identified a set of stakeholder-wants from the literature and included research questions that tie key stakeholder-wants to each of the three priorities in this article and the four priorities in the companion article. Here, we highlight the critical importance of scholarship and practice related to the design of sustainable service ecosystems and discuss three key service research priorities: large-scale and complex service ecosystems for transformative impact (SRP5), platform ecosystems and marketplaces (SRP6), and services for disadvantaged consumers and communities (SRP7). We call for an engaged service scholarship that considers the interrelationships among consumers, organizations, employees, platforms, and societal institutions and pursues transformative goals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much less life threatening yet life-changing, and thus less noticed and consequently less discussed, is the rapid development of what can be summarized as the platform economy (Field et al., 2021).”
From Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy (2022) · cites this paper as Field et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765
Self-citationResilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03610-150420 · Cited by 5,206
Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife-- Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A., & Hyatt, A. D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5452.443 · Cited by 4,977
Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3 · Cited by 4,208
The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American.
Arnett, J. J. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.7.602 · Cited by 2,178
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Financial well-being: A conceptualization and research agenda
Brüggen, E. C., Hogreve, J., Holmlund, M., Kabadayi, S., & Löfgren, M. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.013 · Cited by 1,267
Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. S. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.67.18259 · Cited by 1,167
Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange
Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593110393713 · Cited by 1,161
More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing
Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003 · Cited by 1,101
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Altman Elizabeth J., Nagle Frank (2020), “Accelerating Innovation,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 61 (4), 24-30.
- Elena Garidis (2020), “Long Term Stock Exchange, Built for a Better World,” Sustainable Review, (accessed on March 11, 2021), https://sustainablereview.com/long-term-stock-exchange.
- Hernández Javier C., 2020, Global Anger Grows Over George Floyd Death, and Becomes an Anti-Trump Cudgel
- McGhee Heather C. (2021), The Sum of Us: What Racism Costs Everyone and How We Can Prosper Together, First edition, New York: One World.
- Schwab Klaus (2021), Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy That Works for Progress, People and Planet, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
- Scott W. Richard (2001), Institutions and Organizations, 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
- Seligman Adam B., 2000, The Problem of Trust
- Tooze Adam, 2018, Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the
- Vulnerable Populations, 2006, AJMC, 348
- West Sarah M., 2019, AI Now Institute
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 · Cited by 2,753
Self-citationService Research Priorities: Managing and Delivering Service in Turbulent Times
Ostrom, A. L., Field, J. M., Fotheringham, D., Subramony, M. V., Gustafsson, A., Lemon, K. N., Huang, M., & McColl‐Kennedy, J. R. (2021) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705211021915 · Cited by 336
Self-citationAllal‐Chérif, O., Climent, J. C., & Ulrich, K. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113379 · Cited by 140
Healing the Digital Divide With Digital Inclusion: Enabling Human Capabilities
Fisk, R. P., Gallan, A. S., Joubert, A. M., Beekhuyzen, J., Cheung, L., & Russell‐Bennett, R. (2022) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705221140148 · Cited by 161
Digital service innovation in B2B markets
Kowalkowski, C., Wirtz, J., & Ehret, M. (2023) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-12-2022-0403 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Field, J. M., Fotheringham, D., Subramony, M., Gustafsson, A., Ostrom, A. L., Lemon, K. N., Huang, M.-H., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- BI Norwegian Business School (NO)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- The University of Queensland, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Field, Joy M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-09-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 462-479
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W3190997225
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 27.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- platform ecosystems, marketplaces, transformative impact, service design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review