Cited by 72Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Is there a Sex Difference in the Course Following Traumatic Brain Injury?

Kirkness, Catherine J., Burr, Robert L., Mitchell, Pamela H., Newell, David W.·2004·Biological Research For Nursing

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of death and disability in the United States. Sex has not been thoroughly examined as a factor that may influence outcome following TBI. Clinical studies involving humans that have focused on sex and TBI outcome have yielded inconclusive results, yet sex-related physiologic differences have been demonstrated in animal studies. The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction of sex and age in relation to outcome at 3 and 6 months postinjury in a population of individuals with TBI. The sample includes 157 subjects (124 males, 33 females), 16 to 89 years of age, admitted to a level 1 trauma center following TBI. Physiologic data and information about injury severity and clinical course were gathered during hospitalization. Outcome was assessed at 3 and 6 months postinjury using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) and Functional Status Examination (FSE). In this sample, there was a significant relationship between sex and age with respect to functional outcome at 6 months following TBI, controlling for initial injury severity. Females age 30 years or older had significantly poorer outcome as measured by the GOSE (P = 0.031) and the FSE (P = 0.037) than either males or younger females. There was also a very different rate of recovery, with women age 30 years and older, on average, showing no improvement between 3 and 6 months postinjury. Further study is needed to elucidate the reasons why sex may affect outcome following TBI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1099800404263050

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mortality and GOS-E were found to be different between sexes despite similar cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure.

    “Conversely, mortality and GOS-E were found to be different between sexes despite similar cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure. 57”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirkness, C. J., Burr, R. L., Mitchell, P. H., & Newell, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Biological Research For Nursing
Published
2004-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
299-310
ISSN
  • 1099-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4175
OpenAlex
W2084300781
Cited by
72
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Research For Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01nr004501-03)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01 NR04501-03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, sex differences, functional outcome, age, injury severity, recovery, Glasgow Outcome Scale, sex hormones
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, United States, Trauma Severity Indices, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review