Cited by 10EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The Relationship between WTC and Oral Proficiency Measurements in the Study Abroad Context

Open access
Robson, Graham G.·2015·International Education Studies

Abstract

Theories of second language acquisition such as the Interaction Hypothesis (Long, 1996) and Pushed Output Hypothesis (Swain, 1995) emphasize that learners must actually communicate in order to bring about the conditions for language acquisition. Learners who are more willing to communicate may create more opportunities for interaction, and thereby possibly improve their spoken proficiency. In L2 research fluency, accuracy and complexity have been used to extensively measure spoken output. This study uses qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate a largely under-researched area: whether there is a relation between fluency, accuracy and complexity, task engagement, and measures of willingness to communicate and actual learner communication and how these change for a group of 23 high-proficiency mainly Asian L2 English learners on a nine-week academic preparation course at a university in England.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/ies.v8n12p56

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. DeKeyser, R. (1991). Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition: Research and the classroom (pp. 104-119). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
  2. Lara, A. R. (2014). Complexity, accuracy and fluency development through study abroad programs varying in duration (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Pompeu Fabra: Barcelona, Spain.
  3. Pellegrino-Aveni, V. A. (2005). Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620584 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robson, G. G.
Affiliations
Toyo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Robson, Graham G.
Venue
International Education Studies
Published
2015-11-25
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
56
ISSN
  • 1913-9020 (ISSN-L)
  • 1913-9039
OpenAlex
W2179097176
Cited by
9
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Education Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
willingness to communicate, speaking skills, speech fluency, accuracy, complexity, task engagement, interaction hypothesis, second language acquisition, study abroad, L2 English learners, student communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review