Cited by 850EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCommunication in Education and HealthcareSecond Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 17 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables

Dewaele, Jean-Marc, Witney, John, Saito, Kazuya, Dewaele, Livia·2018·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

Positive psychology has boosted interest in the positive as well as the negative emotions that Foreign Language learners experience. The present study examines whether – and to what extent – foreign language enjoyment (FLE) and foreign language (FL) classroom anxiety (FLCA) are linked to a range of learner internal variables and teacher/classroom-specific variables within one specific educational context. Participants were 189 British high school students learning various FLs. Higher levels of FLE were linked to higher scores on attitudes towards the FL, the FL teacher, FL use in class, proportion of time spent on speaking, relative standing and stage of development. Lower levels FLCA were linked to higher scores on attitudes towards the FL, relative standing and stage of development. FLCA thus seems less related to teacher and teacher practices than FLE. The pedagogical implication is that teachers should strive to boost FLE rather than worry too much about students’ FLCA.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This questionnaire study of 189 British high school foreign language learners found that foreign language enjoyment (FLE) and foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA) are weakly negatively related and largely separate emotion dimensions. FLE was linked to more learner-internal and teacher/classroom variables than FLCA, leading the authors to advise teachers to focus on boosting enjoyment rather than worrying primarily about anxiety.

Key findings

  • FLE and FLCA had a small significant negative correlation, \(r(188) = -.194, p < .007\), sharing only 3.8% of variance; mean FLE was 3.9 (\(SD = 0.6\)) and mean FLCA was 2.4 (\(SD = 0.8\)).
  • FLE was significantly linked to age, \(F(6,189) = 4.0, p < .001, \eta^2 = .118\); gender, with females higher than males (4.2 vs. 3.8, \(t = 3.7, p < .0001, d = 0.54\)); FL level, \(F(3,185) = 4.4, p < .005, \eta^2 = .066\); attitude towards the FL, \(F(3,185) = 24.8, p < .0001, \eta^2 = .287, d = 1.27\); attitude towards the teacher, \(F(4,184) = 16.7, p < .0001, \eta^2 = .267, d = 1.2\); teacher FL use, \(F(4,184) = 6.2, p < .0001, \eta^2 = .118, d = .73\); time spent speaking, \(F(6,182) = 2.5, p < .023, \eta^2 = .076\); and teacher predictability negatively, \(F(3,185) = 3.9, p < .001, \eta^2 = .06, d = .50\).
  • FLCA was significantly linked to gender, with females higher than males (2.6 vs. 2.3, \(t = 2.5, p < .014, d = 0.37\)); FL level, \(F(3,185) = 12.3, p < .0001, \eta^2 = .166, d = .89\); relative standing among peers, \(F(3,185) = 13.4, p < .0001, \eta^2 = .076, d = .57\); and attitude towards the FL, \(F(3,185) = 4.0, p < .009, \eta^2 = .069, d = .54\). Teacher/classroom variables were mostly unrelated to FLCA.
  • Multilingualism was unrelated to both FLE and FLCA. The results section reports relative standing was not significantly linked to FLE, although the abstract and conclusion list it among FLE correlates.

Methods

  • Participants were 189 high school students (49 females, 140 males) aged 12–18 from two Greater London schools: Dame Alice Owen’s (\(n = 63\)) and Westminster School (\(n = 126\)); most studied French (\(n = 144\)), and the sample was described as very good FL students.
  • An anonymous online questionnaire collected demographics, attitudes towards the FL and teacher, teacher FL use, time spent on reading/writing/listening/speaking, teacher predictability, 10 FLE items from Dewaele and MacIntyre (2014; Cronbach alpha = .88), and 8 FLCA items from the FLCAS (Cronbach alpha = .85), using 5-point Likert scales.
  • Analyses included Pearson correlation, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVAs, and Gabriel post-hoc tests, with effect sizes interpreted using Plonsky and Oswald’s benchmarks.

Limitations

  • The authors state the design was non-experimental, so they identified relationships without claiming direct causality.
  • The authors state self-selection bias may have skewed results positively, that findings may not generalize to the whole FL population, and that participants were very good FL students in selective schools.
  • Evident from the text: the sample is gender-imbalanced (49 females vs. 140 males) and drawn from only two selective/top-performing Greater London schools; the paper also contains an inconsistency in which relative standing is listed as an FLE correlate in the abstract/conclusion but reported as non-significant for FLE in the results and Table 1.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168817692161

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

2 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Verification

Claims the paper makes

51 Own result · 22 Own interpretation · 17 Not checked yet · 7 Own method · 6 No basis given

Verify all 17 references — free account

Show all 71 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 21
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants' self-reported level of mastery in the foreign language accurately reflects their actual proficiency.

    “Participants were also asked about the point they had reached in their FL journey. Very few described themselves as 'beginner' ( n = 2), more so as 'low intermediate' ( n = 21), 'intermediate', ( n = 58), 'high intermediate' ( n = 92), and 'advanced' ( n = 26).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The single-item measures of attitudes towards the foreign language, the foreign language teacher, frequency of foreign language use, time spent on speaking, and predictability are valid measures of those constructs.

    “The questionnaire started with a demographics section from which the above information was retrieved. Following this, participants were asked to respond to an item on their attitude towards their first modern FL (as some students learned two FLs simultaneously), on a 5-point Likert scale.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The participants provided objective reports of actual teacher behaviour of close to 38 teachers.

    “we assume that our participants provided us with objective reports of actual teacher behaviour of close to 38 teachers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When pupils in the UK move from eight or nine subjects at age 15 to three or four in their final two years of schooling, they are generally choosing subjects that they most enjoy and the skills acquired hitherto are employed in developing greater learner autonomy and an engagement in more challenging tasks relevant to their chosen path.

    “When pupils in the UK move from eight or nine subjects at age 15 to three or four in their final two years of schooling, they are generally choosing subjects that they most enjoy and the skills acquired hitherto are employed in developing greater learner autonomy and an engagement in more challenging tasks relevant to their chosen path.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other independent variables undoubtedly affect the overall picture, such as significantly reduced class sizes, more informal pupil-teacher relationships and greater maturity.

    “Other independent variables undoubtedly affect the overall picture, such as significantly reduced class sizes, more informal pupil-teacher relationships and greater maturity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some teachers do, consciously or unconsciously, cause anxiety.

    “Even if the teachers in the present study did not seem to cause heightened anxiety, some teachers do, consciously or unconsciously cause anxiety.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upr(188) = -0.194reported p < .007 · recomputed p = .007

    “r (188) = -.194, p < .007”

  • Consistentr(187) = 0.5reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001

    “r (187) = .50, p < .0001”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

6 of 6

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Arnold J., 2007, Language acquisition and development, 107
  2. Avila-López J., 2015, MARCO ELE: Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera, 21, 1
  3. Baider F., 2015, Le langage et l’homme, 50, 3
  4. Berdal-Masuy F., 2015, Le langage et l’homme, 50, 3
  5. Dewaele J.-M., 2010, Language practices and identity construction in French, 133
  6. Dewaele J.-M., 2011, Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 22, 23
  7. Dewaele J.-M., 2016, Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 2, 41
  8. Dulay H., 1977, Viewpoints on English as a second language, 95
  9. Mettewie L., 2015, Le Langage et l’Homme, L2, 23
  10. Murphy T., 2009, New challenges in language and literature, 129
  11. Nation P., 2003, Asian EFL Journal, 5, 1
  12. Schumann J., 1978, Second-language acquisition and foreign language teaching, 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 850

Metadata

Authors
Dewaele, J.-M., Witney, J., Saito, K., & Dewaele, L.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Westminster School, London, UK
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Dewaele, Jean-Marc
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2017-02-17
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
676-697
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2588952674
Cited by
780
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6
FWCI
154.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
foreign language enjoyment, foreign language classroom anxiety, student attitudes, teacher attitudes, relative standing, developmental stages, speaking time, teacher practices, high school students, positive psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review