Cited by 12Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Insistence on sameness, repetitive negative thinking and mental health in autistic and non-autistic adults

Open access
Cooper, Kate, Russell, Ailsa·2025·Autism

Abstract

Autistic people experience high rates of mental health problems. A tendency towards behavioural repetition in autistic individuals could contribute to repetitive negative thinking, which is a transdiagnostic risk factor for mental health problems. Our research aimed to add to the literature by using transdiagnostic measures of both mental health symptoms and repetitive negative thinking. We explored the relationships between insistence on sameness and depression-anxiety, via the mediating role of repetitive negative thinking, operationalised as rumination and obsessing. Three groups of adults were recruited; autistic clinical cohort participants ( n = 67); autistic community participants ( n = 54) and non-autistic community participants ( n = 66). All participants completed measures of Insistence on sameness; Anxiety and Depression; Obsessing; Rumination. Autistic community participants had significantly higher insistence on sameness, rumination and obsessing scores than non-autistic community participants. The mediation analysis found support for the hypothesis that the relationship between insistence on sameness and depression-anxiety would be mediated by rumination and obsessing in all participants. The higher rates of repetitive negative thinking found in autistic individuals may contribute to elevated rates of mental health problems in this group. Mental health assessments and interventions for autistic people should consider transdiagnostic factors including multiple forms of repetitive negative cognition and behaviour. Lay abstract: Autistic people are more likely to have mental health problems than non-autistic people. We know that having repetitive and negative thoughts can contribute to multiple mental health problems such as depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Autistic people often do the same behaviours repetitively, and they may also have more repetitive thinking styles. This could contribute to higher rates of mental health problems in autistic people. In this research, we wanted to find out if higher rates of repetitive behaviours contributed to depression and anxiety, and whether this relationship was because of repetitive negative thinking. We asked three groups of autistic adults to take part in the research. Sixty-seven autistic clinical participants were recruited from clinical settings and had moderate depression. Fifty-four autistic community participants and 66 non-autistic community participants were recruited from community settings. All participants completed measures of repetitive behaviours; a measure of anxiety and depression; and two measures of repetitive negative thinking (ruminating and obsessing). Autistic community participants had significantly higher repetitive behaviours, rumination and obsessing scores than non-autistic community participants. We found that higher rates of repetitive behaviours contributed to more repetitive thinking (obsessing and ruminating), which contributed to higher rates of depression and anxiety. The higher rates of repetitive negative thinking found in autistic individuals may contribute to higher rates of mental health problems in this group. Mental health assessments and interventions for autistic people should therefore consider the role of multiple forms of repetitive negative cognition and behaviour, which cut across diagnostic categories such as anxiety, depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. These should be considered when aiming to understand why individuals develop mental health conditions and why these conditions persist.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13623613241275468

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Beck A. T. (2002). Cognitive models of depression. Clinical Advances in Cognitive Psychotherapy: Theory and Application, 14(1), 29– 61.
  2. Clark D. M. Wells A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In Heimberg R. G. Liebowitz M. R. Hope D. A. Schneier F. R. (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69– 93). Guilford Press.
  3. Happé F. Frith U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in Autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5– 25. 16450045
  4. Hayes A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
  5. NICE. (2012). Autism spectrum disorder in adults: Diagnosis and management. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG142 32186834
  6. Russell A. J. Jassi A. Fullana M. A. Mack H. Johnston K. Heyman I. Murphy D. G. Mataix-Cols D. (2013). Cognitive behavior therapy for comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Depression and Anxiety, 30(8), 697– 708. 23389964

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, K., & Russell, A.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Cooper, Kate
Venue
Autism
Published
2024-09-14
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
424-434
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W4402541397
Cited by
11
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (HTA 14/43/02, ICA-CDRF-2018-04-ST2-047)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
insistence on sameness, repetitive negative thinking, autistic adults, mental health, depression, anxiety, rumination, repetitive behavior, transdiagnostic risk factors, mediation, obsessive-compulsive disorder
MeSH terms
Pessimism, Rumination, Cognitive, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Autistic Disorder, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Obsessive Behavior, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Stereotyped Behavior, Thinking, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review