Cited by 200Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Interoceptive pathways to understand and treat mental health conditions

Open access
Nord, Camilla L., Garfinkel, Sarah N.·2022·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

An increasing recognition that brain and body are dynamically coupled has enriched our scientific understanding of mental health conditions. Peripheral signals interact centrally to influence how we think and feel, generating our sense of the internal condition of the body, a process known as interoception. Disruptions to this interoceptive system may contribute to clinical conditions, including anxiety, depression, and psychosis. After reviewing the nature of interoceptive disturbances in mental health conditions, this review focuses on interoceptive pathways of existing and putative mental health treatments. Emerging clinical interventions may target novel peripheral treatment mechanisms. Future treatment development requires forward- and back-translation to uncover and target specific interoceptive processes in mental health to elucidate their efficacy relative to interventions targeting other factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.004

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been hypothesized to modulate interoceptive processing through both central and peripheral mechanisms, including changes in insula responsivity, visceral sensitivity, and interoceptive sensibility.

    “SSRIs have been hypothesized to modulate interoceptive processing through both central and peripheral mechanisms, including changes in insula responsivity, visceral sensitivity, and interoceptive sensibility [60].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nord, C. L., & Garfinkel, S. N.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Nord, Camilla L.
  • Garfinkel, Sarah N.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
499-513
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224222155
Cited by
199
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 11
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CARP MR/V037676/1)
  • Medical Research Council (G101400, MC_UU_00030/12, MR/V037676/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
interoception, mental illness, anxiety, depression, psychosis, forward and back translation, treatment development
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Awareness, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Mental Health, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review