Cited by 48Digital Mental Health InterventionsAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The feasibility of low-intensity psychological therapy for depression co-occurring with autism in adults: The Autism Depression Trial (ADEPT) – a pilot randomised controlled trial

Open access
Russell, Ailsa, Gaunt, Daisy M, Cooper, Kate, Barton, Stephen, Horwood, Jeremy, Kessler, David, Metcalfe, Chris, Ensum, Ian +4 more·2020·Autism

Abstract

Low-intensity cognitive behaviour therapy including behavioural activation is an evidence-based treatment for depression, a condition frequently co-occurring with autism. The feasibility of adapting low-intensity cognitive behaviour therapy for depression to meet the needs of autistic adults via a randomised controlled trial was investigated. The adapted intervention (guided self-help) comprised materials for nine individual sessions with a low-intensity psychological therapist. Autistic adults (n = 70) with depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ⩾10) recruited from National Health Service adult autism services and research cohorts were randomly allocated to guided self-help or treatment as usual. Outcomes at 10-, 16- and 24-weeks post-randomisation were blind to treatment group. Rates of retention in the study differed by treatment group with more participants attending follow-up in the guided self-help group than treatment as usual. The adapted intervention was well-received, 86% (n = 30/35) of participants attended the pre-defined ‘dose’ of five sessions of treatment and 71% (25/35) attended all treatment sessions. The findings of this pilot randomised controlled trial indicate that low-intensity cognitive behaviour therapy informed by behavioural activation can be successfully adapted to meet the needs of autistic people. Evaluation of the effectiveness of this intervention in a full scale randomised controlled trial is now warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361319889272

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Horwood J. Cooper K. Harvey H. Evans L. Russell A. (2018). Qualitative evaluation of a low-intensity psychological intervention for depression in adults with autism: The Autism Depression Trial (ADEPT) [Conference session]. International Society for Autism Research, Rotterdam. https://insar.confex.com/insar/2018/webprogram/Paper27708.html.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, A., Gaunt, D. M., Cooper, K., Barton, S., Horwood, J., Kessler, D., Metcalfe, C., Ensum, I., Ingham, B., Parr, J. R., Rai, D., & Wiles, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Russell, Ailsa
Venue
Autism
Published
2019-11-29
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1360-1372
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2991110875
Cited by
48
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Health Technology Assessment Programme (14/043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, autistic adults, behavioral activation, guided self-help, feasibility, treatment retention
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Pilot Projects, State Medicine, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review