Cited by 106Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Conceptualisation of ageing in relation to factors of importance for extending working life – a review

Open access
Nilsson, Kerstin·2016·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore and understand the complexity of ageing in relation to factors of importance for extending working life. Method: Discourse analysis of documents was used in an integrative review including 128 articles. Result: Four different conceptualisation of ageing are shown to affect older workers’ ability to extend their working life: (a) biological ageing people’s health in relation to their physical and mental work environment, their pace of work and recuperation needs; (b) chronological ageing statutory retirement age and policies and economic incentives devised for older workers by society, unions and organisations/enterprises; (c) social ageing inclusion in different social groups, the attitude of managers, organisations and family members, the leisure activities and surrounding environment; and (d) mental/cognitive ageing self-crediting, motivating and meaningful activities, competence and skills in working life. Conclusions: Societies today focus mostly on chronological ageing and are looking to increase the retirement age with regard to statutory pension systems, e.g. beyond 65 years of age. The inter-relationships between chronological, mental, biological and social ageing and the nine areas identified as being important to older workers in these respects need to be considered when aiming to provide a sustainable working life for the increasing numbers of older workers in modern society. The theoretical model developed is a contribution to the critical debate that can be applied by societies, employers and managers in order to provide older workers with an inclusive and sustainable extended working life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494816636265

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older workers are more prone to workplace injuries than younger workers.

    “older workers are more prone to workplace injuries compared to their younger counterparts (Nilsson, 2016; Wegman & McGee, 2004).”

    From Policy Initiatives to Address the Challenges of an Older Population in the Workforce (2023) · cites this paper as Nilsson, 2016

    The Physical work environment section says older workers may face higher injury risk in demanding work environments, but it expressly reports that they have fewer injuries than younger workers overall. That contrary comparison does not support the citing sentence’s unqualified claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Toossi, M. Labor force projections to 2020: A more slowly growing workforce. Monthly Labor Review 2012;135:34 -64.
  2. * McLaughlin AC. Sprufera JF. Aging Farmers Are at Risk for Injuries and Fatalities: How Human-Factors Research and Application Can Help. North Carolina Medical Journal 2011; 72(6):481-483.
  3. * Weaver DA. The work and retirement decision of older women: A literature review. Social Security Bulletin 1994; 57(1):1-40.
  4. * Diamond P. Behavioural economics. Journal of Public Economics 2008; 92:1858-1862.
  5. * Nilsson K. Attitudes of managers and older employees to each other and the effects on the decision to extended working life. In Ennals R. Salomon RH. (eds.) Older Workers in a Sustainable Society. Labor, Education & Society. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag, 2011: 147-156.
  6. Mirowsky J. Ross CE. Cumulative Advantage and its Rising Importance. Research on Aging 2008; 30(1):93-122.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nilsson, K.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Nilsson, Kerstin
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-03-14
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
490-505
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2299429056
Cited by
106
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
aging, working life extension, older workers, chronological aging, biological aging, social aging, cognitive aging, retirement age, pensions, work environment, workplace inclusion, leisure, sustainable working life
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Employment, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Retirement, Social Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review