Political persuasion on social media: tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction
Abstract
News use via social media has been linked to pro-democratic political behaviors. However, most people use social media for non-political purposes, like connecting with friends and browsing news feeds. Recent research indicates these behaviors may also have democratic benefits, by means of political expression in social media. Drawing on panel data from a nationally representative sample, this study extends this line of research by exploring how social interaction and news-seeking behaviors on social media lead to diverse networks, exposure to dissenting political opinion, and ultimately reconsidering and changing one’s political views. Social media are a unique communication platform, and their attributes might influence exposure to political information. The tendency for users to build and maintain friend networks creates a potential deliberative space for political persuasion to take place. Consistent with prior literature, news use leads to political persuasion. More interestingly, apolitical, but social interactive uses of social media also lead to political persuasion. These relationships are partially mediated through network and discussion attributes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social media can operate as a tool for political persuasion.
“This is one reason why social media can operate as a tool for political persuasion [28,29].”
From Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,169 · see citing works
What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters
Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2655098 · Cited by 4,864 · see citing works
Menaghan, E. G. (2004) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/009430610403300625 · Cited by 2,799 · see citing works
The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment
Centola, D. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185231 · Cited by 2,692 · see citing works
(1998) · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11421 · Cited by 2,575 · see citing works
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940 · see citing works
Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,919 · see citing works
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Troy, J. (2005) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80802-8_11 · Cited by 1,654 · see citing works
Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-6564 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004) · BT Technology Journal · doi:10.1023/b:bttj.0000047585.06264.cc · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment
Gerber, A. S., GREEN, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540808009x · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys
Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1024232915870 · Cited by 1,294 · see citing works
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Mutz, D. C. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088437 · Cited by 1,265 · cited 9× · see citing works
“If one discusses issues with those of an opposing view, they are more likely to be aware of their own position, and more likely to understand the counter viewpoint (Mutz, 2002; Rojas and Gil de Zúñiga, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialUses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging
Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610380009 · Cited by 1,205 · cited 2× · see citing works
“How might individuals be persuaded to reconsider their political views in this relatively new social sphere? The majority of social media users turn to these platforms to socialize, receive updates from friends in their network, get emotional support, or browse photos and videos (Pew Research Center for the People and…”
BackgroundMedia Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence
Wood, W. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Beyond rational choice: The social dynamics of how people seek help
Pescosolido, B. A. (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229863 · Cited by 1,017 · see citing works
Blais, A. (2000) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt5hjrrf · Cited by 943 · see citing works
To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory
Blais, A. (2000) · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media
Mutz, D. C. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000223 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
de Zúñiga, H. G., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12103 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Wojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. C. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. D. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617102 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
DOES DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY WORK
Ryfe, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks.
Collins, H., & Laumann, E. O. (1974) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2061936 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Political Persuasion and Attitude Change
(1996) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9496 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Political disagreement the survival of diverse opinions within communication networks
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. D. (2004) · Cited by 483 · see citing works
The Social Media Basis of Youth Protest Behavior: The Case of Chile
Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization
Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12077 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser‐Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161211425410 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Brundidge, J. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x · Cited by 440 · see citing works
News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy
Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/105846099198541 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
de Zúñiga, H. G., & Valenzuela, S. (2010) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210384984 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior
Sinclair, B. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226922836.001.0001 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life
Owen, D. (2004) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592704500580 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Kim, Y., Chen, H., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.005 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12034 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Partisan Paths to Exposure Diversity: Differences in Pro- and Counterattitudinal News Consumption
Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12105 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2009) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226389899.001.0001 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life
Walsh, K. C. (2003) · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Scheufele, D., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I., & Nisbet, E. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x · Cited by 272 · see citing works
A New Space for Political Behavior: Political Social Networking and its Democratic Consequences
Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12048 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. M., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W., ZUBRIC, S., & Zubric, J. (1999) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365099026006005 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America
(2010) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306110361590i · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Democracy in small groups: participation, decision making, and communication
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4017 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change
Lundgren, S. R., & Prišlin, R. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167298247004 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior
Sinclair, B. (2012) · Cited by 203 · see citing works
A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites
Guerrero, M. (2012) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.687009 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
de Zúñiga, H. G., Correa, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732138 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Gaming Social Capital: Exploring Civic Value in Multiplayer Video Games
Molyneux, L., Vasudevan, K., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2015) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12123 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The Opinion Factor: The Effects of Opinionated News on Information Processing and Attitude Change
Feldman, L. (2011) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.565014 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Levitan, L., & Visser, P. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.001 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation
Yoo, S., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2014) · Communication & Society · doi:10.15581/003.27.4.33-48 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
A study of homophily on social media
Bişğin, H., Agarwal, N., & Xu, X. (2011) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-011-0143-3 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Valenzuela, S. (2014) · International journal of communication · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.004 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Media Favoritism and Presidential Nominations: Reviving the Direct Effects Model
Barker, D. C., & Lawrence, A. B. (2006) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584600500477013 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Contextual Sources of Ambivalence
Keele, L., & Wolak, J. (2008) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00659.x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Political Network Size and Its Antecedents and Consequences
Eveland, W. P., Hutchens, M. J., & Morey, A. C. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737433 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Pratkanis, A. R., & Turner, M. E. (1996) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1996.tb01369.x · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Smith, C. M., Tindale, R. S., & Dugoni, B. L. (1996) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01088.x · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Brundidge, J., Garrett, R., Rojas, H., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2014) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.821492 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Holbert, R. L., Weeks, B. E., & Esralew, S. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213490693 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationComunicación y comunidadPreprint
varios, A. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1189811 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes
Lieberman, A., & Schroeder, J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.022 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Park, C. S., & Kaye, B. K. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017753149 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Diehl, T., Weeks, B. E., & Gil de Zúñiga, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Vienna, Austria; Universidad Diego Portales, Chile
- Corresponding author
- Diehl, Trevor
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1875-1895
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2332642094
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 38.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Keywords
- political persuasion, social media, news consumption, social interaction, political expression, political socialization, political opinion change, friendship networks, deliberation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review