Cited by 181Social Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and PoliticsMedia Studies and Communication

Political persuasion on social media: tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction

Diehl, Trevor, Weeks, Brian E, Gil de Zúñiga, Homero·2016·New Media & Society

Abstract

News use via social media has been linked to pro-democratic political behaviors. However, most people use social media for non-political purposes, like connecting with friends and browsing news feeds. Recent research indicates these behaviors may also have democratic benefits, by means of political expression in social media. Drawing on panel data from a nationally representative sample, this study extends this line of research by exploring how social interaction and news-seeking behaviors on social media lead to diverse networks, exposure to dissenting political opinion, and ultimately reconsidering and changing one’s political views. Social media are a unique communication platform, and their attributes might influence exposure to political information. The tendency for users to build and maintain friend networks creates a potential deliberative space for political persuasion to take place. Consistent with prior literature, news use leads to political persuasion. More interestingly, apolitical, but social interactive uses of social media also lead to political persuasion. These relationships are partially mediated through network and discussion attributes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444815616224

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diehl, T., Weeks, B. E., & Gil de Zúñiga, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Vienna, Austria; Universidad Diego Portales, Chile
Corresponding author
Diehl, Trevor
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1875-1895
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W2332642094
Cited by
181
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
38.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
political persuasion, social media, news consumption, social interaction, political expression, political socialization, political opinion change, friendship networks, deliberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review