Cited by 1,017Social Capital and NetworksContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeCritical Realism in Sociology

Beyond rational choice: The social dynamics of how people seek help

Pescosolido, Bernice A.·1992·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

A classic problem common to sociology and other social sciences revolves around how people make decisions. Some recent approaches start with and revise an individually focused, rational action framework. While this orientation to building transdisciplinary, multilevel models provides many insights, it fails to capture essential features of social life. The social organization strategy (SOS) framework presented in this article offers a complementary approach to social action in general and decision making in particular. This orientation, a network and event-centered counterpart to rational choice, rests on fundamental principles that distinguish the discipline of sociology: social interaction is the basis of social life, and social networks provide the mechanism (interaction) through which individuals learn about, come to understand, and attempt to handle difficulties. This approach shifts the from individual "choice" to socially constructed patterns of decisions, including consultation with others. Utilization research in medical sociology serves as a case for reviewing theoretical approaches to decision making and provides the background necessary to a theoretical exposition of the SOS approach using data from the National Survey of Access to Medical Care (1975-76.) The results support the utility of pursuing the SOS framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/229863

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is essential to consider the roles of social structure and culture in social interaction as a core feature of theories of suicide.

    “These studies illustrate how essential it is to consider the roles of social structure and culture in social interaction, as a core feature of theories of suicide; to not do so contradicts basic contributions to contemporary population health research (Pescosolido, 1992; Hall and Lamont, 2009).”
  • Reluctance of many at-risk people, especially men, to avail themselves of treatment due to stigma and social norms is a major problem in suicide prevention.

    “Major problems in suicide prevention are the paucity of specialized mental health services and the reluctance of many at-risk people, especially men, to avail themselves of treatment due to stigma [91] and social norms [92].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pescosolido, B. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Pescosolido, Bernice A.
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
1992-01
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
1096-1138
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W1981069243
Cited by
1,017
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 47
FWCI
16.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
Keywords
decision-making, rational choice critique, social networks, social interaction, help-seeking, consultation, medical sociology, health care access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review