Cited by 59Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesGender, Feminism, and Media

What do others’ reactions to body posting on Instagram tell us? The effects of social media comments on viewers’ body image perception

Kim, Hye Min·2021·New Media & Society

Abstract

Studies have highlighted the influence of social media comments on users’ perceptual consequences, but whether this holds true in the body image context is still largely unknown. This experimental study investigated the effects of social media comments on ideal body perception and how it influences one’s own body satisfaction. Results showed that comments guided the viewers’ perceptions of what is considered as “ideal” body. Viewers of favorable comments to body posting reported greater idealization of the body imagery (i.e. ideal-enhancing effects), whereas viewers of unfavorable comments showed a lower level of idealization (i.e. ideal-derogating effects). Also, the indirect effects of comments on body satisfaction via idealization were moderated by individual self-discrepancy between personal ideal and own body. This study sheds light on potentially inspiring or protective role of comments against perfect-looking bodies on social media while calling attention to the need for reconsidering the media effects theory for body image.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444820956368

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Hye Min
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
3448-3465
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W3084558869
Cited by
58
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of South California (Annenberg Summer Research Fellowship)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
social media comments, Instagram, body image, body satisfaction, idealization, self-discrepancy, media effects theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review