Cited by 40Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth, Education, and Aging

Public knowledge of late-life cognitive decline and dementia in an international sample

Van Patten, Ryan, Tremont, Geoffrey·2020·Dementia

Abstract

Background and objectives: One method of mitigating global increases in dementia prevalence involves assessing public knowledge and then educating laypeople. We measured knowledge of late-life pathological cognitive decline in a diverse, international sample using a standardized, validated instrument. Research design and methods: We assessed 3619 international respondents recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk with a 44-item dementia knowledge survey and 18 sociodemographic items. Results: Results suggested that the following sociodemographic variables are associated with less overall knowledge: young age, male gender, low educational attainment, born in a developing nation, of ethnic minority status, not married, and less prior dementia experience. Specific knowledge gaps emerged in cerebrovascular disease, delirium versus dementia, treatment of behavioral dementia symptoms, Alzheimer’s disease genetics, Parkinson’s disease symptoms, and characteristics of chronic traumatic encephalopathy and subjective cognitive decline. Discussion and implications: Findings may facilitate effective multinational dementia education initiatives by providing specific recommendations as to which sociodemographic populations and content knowledge domains will benefit the most from limited resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1471301218805923

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women had more information about dementia than men.

    “Similar to other studies the results show that women had more information about dementia than men.”
  • The questionnaire was developed based on previous studies and expert opinions from geriatrists, gerontologists, and older adult care specialists, aiming to assess public knowledge about dementia.

    “The questionnaire was developed based on previous studies and expert opinions from geriatrists, gerontologists, and older adult care specialists, aiming to assess public knowledge about dementia. 15-19”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Patten, R., & Tremont, G.
Affiliations
  • Brown University, USA
  • Rhode Island Hospital (US)
Venue
Dementia
Published
2018-10-11
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1758-1776
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W2897928458
Cited by
40
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Brown University Predoctoral Seed Money Research Grant
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health, Education, and Aging
Keywords
late-life cognitive decline, sociodemographic factors, dementia education, cerebrovascular disease, behavioral symptoms of dementia, Alzheimer's disease genetics, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, subjective cognitive decline, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Minority Groups, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review