CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 279Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and InnovationManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms

Open access
Berends, Hans, Smits, Armand, Reymen, Isabelle, Podoynitsyna, Ksenia·2016·Strategic Organization
DOI 10.1177/1476127016632758PMC PMC5447949
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study addresses the question of how established organizations develop new business models over time, using a process research approach to trace how four business model innovation trajectories unfold. With organizational learning as analytical lens, we discern two process patterns: "drifting" starts with an emphasis on experiential learning and shifts later to cognitive search; "leaping," in contrast, starts with an emphasis on cognitive search and shifts later to experiential learning. Both drifting and leaping can result in radical business model innovations, while their occurrence depends on whether a new business model takes off from an existing model and when it goes into operation. We discuss the implications of these findings for theory on business models and organizational learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1476127016632758

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.2202/1446-9022.1112 · DOI
  2. Casadesus-Masanell R, 2012, Harvard Business Review, 90, 132
  3. 10.2307/259349 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Markides C, 2010, MIT Sloan Management Review, 51, 25
  5. 10.1509/JMKG.72.3.014 · DOI
  6. Vaughan D, 1992, What Is a Case?, 173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 279

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., & Podoynitsyna, K.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Berends, Hans
ORCID
Venue
Strategic Organization
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2016-02-28
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
181-219
ISSN
  • 1476-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-315X
DOI
10.1177/1476127016632758
PMC
PMC5447949
OpenAlex
W2313929078
Cited by
274
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12
FWCI
42.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Strategic Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Liverpool
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Interreg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
business model innovation, organizational learning, experiential learning, cognitive search, incumbent firms, innovation pathways, radical innovation, business model development, organizational change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review