Cited by 26Face Recognition and PerceptionAging and Gerontology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

No effect of age on emotion recognition after accounting for cognitive factors and depression

Open access
Murphy, Jennifer, Millgate, Edward, Geary, Hayley, Catmur, Caroline, Bird, Geoffrey·2019·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

A decline in emotion recognition ability across the lifespan has been well documented. However, whether age predicts emotion recognition difficulties after accounting for potentially confounding factors which covary with age remains unclear. Although previous research suggested that age-related decline in emotion recognition ability may be partly a consequence of cognitive (fluid intelligence, processing speed) and affective (e.g., depression) factors, recent theories highlight a potential role for alexithymia (difficulty identifying and describing one’s emotions) and interoception (perception of the body’s internal state). This study therefore aimed to examine the recognition of anger and disgust across the adult lifespan in a group of 140 20–90-year-olds to see whether an effect of age would remain after controlling for a number of cognitive and affective factors potentially impacted by age. In addition, using an identity recognition control task, the study aimed to determine whether the factors accounting for the effects of age on emotion discrimination also contribute towards generalised face processing difficulties. Results revealed that discrimination of disgust and anger across the lifespan was predicted by processing speed and fluid intelligence, and negatively by depression. No effect of age was found after these factors were accounted for. Importantly, these effects were specific to emotion discrimination; only crystallised intelligence accounted for unique variance in identity discrimination. Contrary to expectations, although interoception and alexithymia were correlated with emotion discrimination abilities, these factors did not explain unique variance after accounting for other variables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1747021819859514

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotion recognition abilities showed a small association with interoceptive accuracy in individuals age 20-90 years, but interoceptive accuracy did not uniquely predict emotion recognition abilities after multiple cognitive and affective factors were controlled for.

    “more recent research found that whilst emotion recognition abilities showed a small association with interoceptive accuracy in individuals age 20–90 years, interoceptive accuracy did not uniquely predict emotion recognition abilities after multiple cognitive and affective factors were controlled for (Murphy, Millgate, et al., 2019).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Murphy, Millgate, et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Ainley, V., Brass, M., & Tsakiris, M. (2014). Heartfelt imitation: high interoceptive awareness is linked to greater automatic imitation. Neuropsychologia , 60 , 21-28. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research , 38 (1), 23-32. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Biotti, F., & Cook, R. (2016). Impaired perception of facial emotion in developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex , 81 , 126-136. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.008 · DOI
  4. Borhani, K., Làdavas, E., Fotopoulou, A., & Haggard, P. (2017). Lacking warmth": Alexithymia trait is related to warm-specific thermal somatosensory processing. Biological Psychology . doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bornemann, B., & Singer, T. (2017). Taking time to feel our body: Steady increases in heartbeat perception accuracy and decreases in alexithymia over 9 months of contemplative mental training. Psychophysiology , 54 (3), 469-482.
  6. Boutet, I., Taler, V., & Collin, C. A. (2015). On the particular vulnerability of face recognition to aging: a review of three hypotheses. Frontiers in Psychology , 6 , 1139. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01139 · DOI
  7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.
  8. Brewer, R., Cook, R., & Bird, G. (2016). Alexithymia: a general deficit of interoception. Royal Society Open Science , 3 (10), 150664. doi:10.1098/rsos.150664 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brewer, R., Cook, R., Cardi, V., Treasure, J., & Bird, G. (2015). Emotion recognition deficits in eating disorders are explained by co-occurring alexithymia. Royal Society Open Science , 2 (1), 140382. doi:10.1098/rsos.140382 · DOI
  10. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology , 77 (3), 305-327. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · DOI
  11. Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience , 6 (8), 641-651. doi:10.1038/nrn1724 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Calder, A. J., Keane, J., Manly, T., Sprengelmeyer, R., Scott, S., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Young, A. W. (2003). Facial expression recognition across the adult life span. Neuropsychologia , 41 (2), 195-202.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, J., Millgate, E., Geary, H., Catmur, C., & Bird, G.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Jennifer
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2019-07-05
Volume
72
Issue
11
Pages
2690-2704
ISSN
  • 0033-555X (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
OpenAlex
W2950749945
Cited by
26
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • baily thomas charitable fund
  • Economic and Social Research Council (1599941; ES/J500057/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotion recognition, age-related decline, lifespan development, anger, disgust, processing speed, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, depression, alexithymia, interoception, face identification, emotion discrimination
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Disgust, Age Factors, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anger, Cognition, Depression, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review