The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glucose Meters: A Review of Technical Challenges to Obtaining Accurate Results
Open accessAbstract
Glucose meters are universally utilized in the management of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic disorders in a variety of healthcare settings. Establishing the accuracy of glucose meters, however, is challenging. Glucose meters can only analyze whole blood, and glucose is unstable in whole blood. Technical accuracy is defined as the closeness of agreement between a test result and the true value of that analyte. Truth for glucose is analysis by isotope dilution mass spectrometry, and frozen serum standards analyzed by this method are available from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Truth for whole blood has not been established, and cells must be separated from the whole blood matrix before analysis by a method like isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Serum cannot be analyzed by glucose meters, and isotope dilution mass spectrometry is not commonly available in most hospitals and diabetes clinics to evaluate glucose meter accuracy. Consensus standards recommend comparing whole blood analysis on a glucose meter against plasma/serum centrifuged from a capillary specimen and analyzed by a clinical laboratory comparative method. Yet capillary samples may not provide sufficient volume to test by both methods, and venous samples may be used as an alternative when differences between venous and capillary blood are considered. There are thus multiple complexities involved in defining technical accuracy and no clear consensus among standards agencies and professional societies on accuracy criteria. Clinicians, however, are more concerned with clinical agreement of the glucose meter with a serum/plasma laboratory result. Acceptance criteria for clinical agreement vary across the range of glucose concentrations and depend on how the result will be used in screening or management of the patient. A variety of factors can affect glucose meter results, including operator technique, environmental exposure, and patient factors, such as medication, oxygen therapy, anemia, hypotension, and other disease states. This article reviews the challenges involved in obtaining accurate glucose meter results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,751
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU
Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Hermans, G., Meersseman, W., Wouters, P. J., Milants, I., Van Wijngaerden, E., Bobbaers, H., & Bouillon, R. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052521 · Cited by 3,639
Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry
(1999) · Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/123.7.646b · Cited by 2,495
Capes, S. E., Hunt, D., Malmberg, K., Pathak, P., & Gerstein, H. C. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/hs1001.096194 · Cited by 1,824
Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose
Clarke, W. L., Cox, D., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Carter, W., & Pohl, S. L. (1987) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.10.5.622 · Cited by 1,435
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008
Dora, J. M., Kramer, C. K., & Canani, L. H. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-0109 · Cited by 1,409
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008
American Diabetes Association (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-s012 · Cited by 1,377
Parkes, J. L., Slatin, S. L., Pardo, S., & Ginsberg, B. H. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.8.1143 · Cited by 620
Vlasselaers, D., Milants, I., Desmet, L., Wouters, P. J., Vanhorebeek, I., van den Heuvel, I., Mesotten, D., Casaer, M. P., Meyfroidt, G., Ingels, C., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60044-1 · Cited by 554
Association of Hyperglycemia with Increased Mortality after Severe Burn Injury
Gore, D. C., Chinkes, D., Heggers, J., Herndon, D. N., Wolf, S. E., & Desai, M. (2001) · Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery · doi:10.1097/00005373-200109000-00021 · Cited by 459
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Bernstein RK, 1997, Dr. Bernstein's diabetes solution. A complete guide to achieving normal blood sugars
- Gore DC, 2001, J Trauma., 51, 540
- ACE/ADA Task Force on Inpatient Diabetes, 2006, Endocr Pract., 12, 4
- International Organization for Standardization, 2007, International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). ISO/IEC Guide 99.
- International Organization for Standardization, 2002, Determination of performance criteria for in vitro blood glucose monitoring systems for management of human diabetes mellitus
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1989, Review criteria for assessment of portable invasive blood glucose monitoring in vitro diagnostic devices which use glucose oxidase, dehydrogenase, or hexokinase methodology
- Canadian Standards Association, 1994, Performance specifications for portable whole blood glucose monitor systems for use in diabetes management
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 1998, Reactive strip assessment protocol for determination of glucose in blood
- TNO Center for Medical Technology, 1991, Quality guideline for non-implantable portable blood glucose monitors for self-monitoring
- Meneghini LF, 2005, Diabetes., 54, A95
- Bamberg R, 2005, Clin Lab Sci., 18, 203
- 10.1213/01.ane.0000264007.46873.0f · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000264007.46873.0f
Cited by
Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement
Riddell, M. C., Gallen, I. W., Smart, C. E., Taplin, C. E., Adolfsson, P., Lumb, A. N., Kowalski, A., Rabasa-Lhoret, R., McCrimmon, R. J., Hume, C., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30014-1 · Cited by 903
Device integration of electrochemical biosensors
Wu, J., Liu, H., Chen, W., Ma, B., & Ju, H. (2023) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00032-w · Cited by 895
The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System
Bailey, T., Bode, B. W., Christiansen, M. P., Klaff, L. J., & Alva, S. (2015) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2014.0378 · Cited by 685
A history of blood glucose meters and their role in self-monitoring of diabetes mellitus
Clarke, S. F., & Foster, J. R. (2012) · British Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1080/09674845.2012.12002443 · Cited by 456
Wearable Electrochemical Glucose Sensors in Diabetes Management: A Comprehensive Review
Saha, T., Del Caño, R., Mahato, K., De la Paz, E., Chen, C., Ding, S., Yin, L., & Wang, J. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00078 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Tonyushkina, K., & Nichols, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 971-980
- ISSN
- 1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112149778
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glucose Meters: A Review of Technical Challenges to Obtaining Accurate Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/193229680900300446
- The paper
- Tonyushkina, K., & Nichols, J. H. (2009). Glucose Meters: A Review of Technical Challenges to Obtaining Accurate Results. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680900300446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.