Cited by 64Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

How much is short-term glucose prediction in type 1 diabetes improved by adding insulin delivery and meal content information to CGM data? A Proof-of-Concept Study

Open access
Zecchin, Chiara, Facchinetti, Andrea, Sparacino, Giovanni, Cobelli, Claudio·2016·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, short-term glucose prediction can allow to anticipate therapeutic decisions when hypo/hyperglycemia is imminent. Literature prediction methods mainly use past continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) readings. Sophisticated algorithms can use information on insulin delivered and meal carbohydrate (CHO) content. The quantification of how much insulin and CHO information improves glucose prediction is missing in the literature and is investigated, in an open-loop setting, in this proof-of-concept study. METHODS: We adopted a versatile literature prediction methodology able to utilize a variety of inputs. We compared predictors that use (1) CGM; (2) CGM and insulin; (3) CGM and CHO; and (4) CGM, insulin, and CHO. Data of 15 T1D subjects in open-loop setup were used. Prediction was evaluated via absolute error and temporal gain focusing on meal/night periods. The relative importance of each individual input of the predictor was evaluated with a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: For a prediction horizon (PH) ≥ 30 minutes, insulin and CHO information improves prediction accuracy of 10% and double the temporal gain during the 2 hours following the meal. During the night the 4 methods did not give statistically different results. When PH ≥ 45 minutes, the influence of CHO information on prediction is 5-fold that of insulin. CONCLUSIONS: In an open-loop setting, with PH ≥ 30 minutes, information on CHO and insulin improves short-term glucose prediction in the 2-hour time window following a meal, but not during the night. CHO information improves prediction significantly more than insulin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296816654161

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithms that use CGM data plus external inputs, such as ingested carbohydrates, injected insulin and physical activity, have been shown to enhance prediction performance compared to predictions using only CGM data.

    “While, others use CGM data plus external inputs, such as the amount of ingested carbohydrates, injected insulin and physical activity [52]. These have been shown to enhance the performance of predictions when compared to predictions using only CGM data [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zecchin, C., Facchinetti, A., Sparacino, G., & Cobelli, C.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Cobelli, Claudio
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2016-07-10
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
1149-1160
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2474805097
Cited by
64
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin delivery, prediction horizon, sensitivity analysis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review