Cited by 49Diabetes Management and ResearchHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Accuracy of continuous glucose monitors for inpatient diabetes management

Open access
Wright, Jordan J., Williams, Alexander J., Friedman, Sally B., Weaver, Rita G., Williams, Jonathan M., Hodge, Elizabeth, Fowler, Michael, Bao, Shichun·2023·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Introduction: In hospitalized patients, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may improve glycemic control, prevent hypoglycemic events, and reduce staff workload compared with point-of-care (POC) capillary glucose monitoring. Methods: To evaluate CGM accuracy and safety of use in the inpatient setting, two versions of CGM sensors were placed on 43 and 34 adult patients with diabetes admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) medical wards, respectively. CGM accuracy relative to POC and safety of use were measured by calculating mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and by Clarke Error Grid (CEG) analysis. Results: CGM version 2 had improved accuracy compared with CGM version 1 with MARD 17.7 compared with 21.4%. CGM accuracy did not change with POC value or with time of sensor wear. On CEG, 98.8% of paired values fell within acceptable zones A and B. Conclusion: Despite reduced accuracy compared with the outpatient setting, both versions of CGMs had acceptable safety profiles in the inpatient setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968221076562

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies assessing effectiveness of inpatient CGM may ultimately lead to approved use of CGM for monitoring hospitalized individuals.

    “Studies have been published assessing the effectiveness of this approach, which may ultimately lead to the approved use of CGM for monitoring hospitalized individuals (277,286-295).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [292]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, J. J., Williams, A. J., Friedman, S. B., Weaver, R. G., Williams, J. M., Hodge, E., Fowler, M., & Bao, S.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Jordan J.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2022-02-07
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1252-1255
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210915280
Cited by
49
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK20593, T32DK7061)
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, CGM accuracy, inpatient diabetes management, hospitalized patients, glycemic control, hypoglycemia prevention, Clarke error grid, mean absolute relative difference, sensor safety, internal medicine ward
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Inpatients, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review