Cited by 19Schizophrenia research and treatmentCognitive Functions and MemoryMental Health and Psychiatry

Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia

Open access
Cella, Matteo, Edwards, Clementine, Swan, Sarah, Elliot, Kay, Reeder, Clare, Wykes, Til·2019·Journal of Experimental Psychopathology

Abstract

Background: Interventions targeting cognition in people with schizophrenia have shown moderate effects on improving functioning. Recent cognitive remediation (CR) approaches have begun to target metacognition to improve functioning outcomes. This study aims to develop a novel measure of metacognition and assess whether metacognitive-based CR (mCR) can improve metacognition. Method: We use data from a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing mCR plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone in people with schizophrenia. Participants were assessed with measures of cognition, functioning, and a new measure of metacognition at three time points: Week 0 (baseline), Week 12, and Week 24. Results: The evaluation of the novel metacognition assessment suggests that it is a reliable and valid measure. The measure positively correlates with cognitive measures, in particular with executive function and IQ but also with a measure of functioning. We found that a course of mCR was able to increase metacognition compared to TAU by Week 24. Conclusions: Metacognition may be an important mechanism to explain how CR affects functioning outcomes in people with psychosis. The systematic assessment of metacognition as part of CR studies may help to evaluate more clearly its role and relevance to functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2043808719826846

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interventions included staff training about activity engagement, Individual Placement and Support (IPS), cognitive remediation, Social Recovery Therapy (SRT), a befriending program, lifestyle modification and occupational therapy group programs.

    “These interventions included staff training about activity engagement, its importance for addressing mental illness and approaches to encourage engagement (49); Individual Placement and Support (IPS) (45, 48); cognitive remediation (50); Social Recovery Therapy (SRT) (based on cognitive behavioral strategies) (52–54); a befriending program (56); lifestyle modification (51) and occupational therapy”
  • The TUS has been used to measure time spent in structured activities (excluding resting and sleep) as an indicator of overall functioning.

    “To date, the TUS has been variously used to measure time spent in structured activities (excluding resting and sleep) as an indicator of overall functioning (50, 52, 53); economic and structured activity participation (55); social participation (e.g. places visited and people with whom activities were completed) (56); and time use as an indicator of social recovery (54).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bland, J. M. and D. G. Altman (1997). "Cronbach's alpha." BMJ 314 (7080): 572.
  2. Flavell, J. H. (1979). "Meta-Cognition and Cognitive Monitoring -New Area of CognitiveDevelopmental Inquiry." American Psychologist 34 (10): 906-911.
  3. Short, S. (2006). Review of the UK 2000 Time Use Survey. London, Office for National Statistics.
  4. Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX, Pearson.
  5. Wykes, T. and C. Reeder (2005). Cognitive remediation therapy for schizophrenia: Theory and practice. London, UK, Brunner Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cella, M., Edwards, C., Swan, S., Elliot, K., Reeder, C., & Wykes, T.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Bethlem Royal Hospital (GB)
  • King’s College London, UK
Corresponding author
Cella, Matteo
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
ISSN
2043-8087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944026743
Cited by
19
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
cognitive remediation, metacognition, schizophrenia, metacognition assessment, executive function, functional outcome, psychosis, cognitive rehabilitation, psychometric validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review