Cited by 81Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsECG Monitoring and Analysis

Acquisition and analysis of cardiovascular signals on smartphones: potential, pitfalls and perspectives: By the Task Force of the e-Cardiology Working Group of European Society of Cardiology

Open access
Bruining, Nico, Caiani, Enrico, Chronaki, Catherine, Guzik, Przemyslaw, van der Velde, Enno·2014·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

Smartphones, mobile applications ('apps'), social media, analytics, and the cloud are profoundly changing the practice of medicine and the way health decisions are made. With the constant progress of technology, the measurement of vital signals becomes easier, cheaper, and practically a standard approach in clinical practice. The interest in measuring vital signals goes beyond medical professionals to the general public, patients, informal caregivers, and healthy individuals, who frequently lack any formal medical training. On smartphone platforms such as iOS and Android, a proliferation of health or medical 'apps' acquire and analyse a variety of vital signs through embedded sensors, interconnected devices or peripherals utilising on occasion analytics and social media. Smartphone vendors compete with traditional medical device manufacturers in the grey area between health care, wellness, and fitness, as US and EU regulatory bodies are setting and revising rules for these new technologies. On the other hand, in the absence of robust validation results, clinicians are hesitant to trust measurements by apps or recommend specific apps to their patients, partly also due to lack of a cost reimbursement policy. This review focuses on the acquisition and analysis on smartphones of three important vital signs in the cardiovascular and respiratory field as well as in rehabilitation i.e. heart or pulse rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygenation. The potential, pitfalls, and perspectives on mobile devices and smartphone apps for health management by patients and healthy individuals are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2047487314552604

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Research2Guidance. Mobile Health Market Report 2013-2017. The commercialization of mHealth Apps (vol. 3), Berlin, Germany: Research2Guidance, March 2013.
  2. European Directory of Health Apps 2012-2013: A review by patient groups and empowered consumers. Patient View, London, UK, http://www.patient-view.com/ uploads/6/5/7/9/6579846/pv_appdirectory_final_web_ 300812.pdf (2011, accessed 19 August 2014).
  3. Bolkhovsky J, Scully CG and Chon KH. Statistical ana- lysis of heart rate and heart rate variability monitoring through the use of smartphone cameras. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012; 2012: 1610-1613.
  4. Garabelli P, Albert D, Reynolds D. Accuracy and nov- elty of an inexpensive iphone-based event recorder. Heart Rhythm conference, Boston, USA, http://bit.ly/Yk8npC (2012, accessed 19 August 2014).
  5. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and and experimental animals. Part 1: Blood pressure measurement in humans. Hypertension 2005; 45: 142-161.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruining, N., Caiani, E., Chronaki, C., Guzik, P., & van der Velde, E.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Health Level Seven International (BE)
  • Department of Cardiology-Intensive Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland
  • Department of Cardiology, Leiden Medical Center, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Chronaki, Catherine
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2014-10-29
Volume
21
Issue
2_suppl
Pages
4-13
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W2324140945
Cited by
81
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (610756)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
mobile health apps, vital signs measurement, cardiovascular signals, heart rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, blood oxygenation, wearable sensors, mobile health, self-monitoring, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Cardiovascular Diseases, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Humans, Oximetry, Oxygen, Predictive Value of Tests, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Telemetry, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Telemedicine, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review