Cited by 185Digital Economy and Work TransformationSocial Media and PoliticsLegal and Labor Studies

The Civic Labor of Volunteer Moderators Online

Open access
Matias, J. Nathan·2019·Social Media + Society

Abstract

Volunteer moderators create, support, and control public discourse for millions of people online, even as moderators’ uncompensated labor upholds platform funding models. What is the meaning of this work and who is it for? In this article, I examine the meanings of volunteer moderation on the social news platform reddit. Scholarship on volunteer moderation has viewed this work separately as digital labor for platforms, civic participation in communities, or oligarchy among other moderators. In mixed-methods research sampled from over 52,000 subreddit communities and in over a dozen interviews, I show how moderators adopt all of these frames as they develop and re-develop everyday meanings of moderation—facing the platform, their communities, and other moderators alike. I also show how this civic notion of digital labor brings clarity to a strike by moderators in July 2015. Volunteer governance remains a common approach to managing social relations, conflict, and civil liberties online. Our ability to see how communities negotiate the meaning of moderation will shape our capacity to address digital governance as a society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2056305119836778

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Volunteer moderators may experience different types of psychological distress due to their distinct motivational factors and activities compared with commercial content moderators.

    “However, volunteer moderators may experience different types of psychological distress due to their distinct motivational factors and the range of activities they engage in which commercial CMs do not (Matias, 2019).”
  • Research to date on the psychological effects of content moderation is sparse and tends to focus on volunteer moderators, who may have different motivations and job-related tasks.

    “Research to date examining the psychological effects of this work is sparse and tends to focus on the experience of volunteer moderators who may have a different set of motivations and job-related tasks (Matias, 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matias, J. N.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Matias, J. Nathan
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2019-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
ISSN
2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2928915328
Cited by
183
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3
FWCI
32.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Microsoft Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
volunteer moderators, online content moderation, digital labor, Reddit, subreddits, platform governance, volunteer governance, public discourse, civil liberties, online communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review