CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 98

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Classical Agrarian Question: Myth, Reality and Relevance Today

Moyo, Sam, Jha, Praveen, Yeros, Paris·2013·Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
DOI 10.1177/2277976013477224
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article traces a particular view of the classical agrarian question in Marxian political economy which has sustained the myth of industrialization as the basic objective of transformation. The idea was born in the late nineteenth century among the European vanguard, then consolidated as an axiom during the Cold War, only to be resurrected in the neoliberal period by a professionalized discipline of ‘agrarian studies’. This article argues that such a view fails to acknowledge the historic importance of the national question and its land and peasant components, which are irreducible to industrialization. The article restores national sovereignty to its proper place in the classical agrarian question and argues that it remains the cornerstone of all other dimensions of the agrarian question, including gender equity and ecological sustainability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2277976013477224

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LVC insisted on the rural world's centrality, contradicting urban-developmentalist narratives positing the countryside's end as necessary for the global South's development.

    “It insisted on the rural world ' s centrality, contradicting urban-developmentalist narratives positing the countryside ' s end as necessary for the global South ' s development (Ajl 2014; Bernstein 2006; Moyo, Jha, and Yeros 2013).”

    From Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South (2018) · cites this paper as Moyo, Jha, and Yeros 2013

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Sebastian Amanor, Kojo, 2008, Land and sustainable development in Africa
  2. 10.1017/S0022278X00022801 · DOI
  3. Amin Samir, 1976, Unequal development
  4. Amin Samir, 1981, The future of Maoism
  5. Amin Samir, 2003, Obsolescent capitalism: Contemporary capitalism and global disorder
  6. 10.1177/227797601200100102 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Anderson Perry, 1976, Considerations on Western Marxism
  8. 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00078.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00272.x · DOI
  10. 10.3362/9781780440118 · DOI
  11. Byres Terry, 1991, A dictionary of Marxist thought, 9
  12. Byres Terry, 1991, Rural Transformation in Asia, 3
  13. 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00071.x · DOI
  14. 10.1525/9780520342118 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.14452/MR-061-09-2010-02_1 · DOI
  16. Graziano da Silva José, 1999, O novo rural brasileiro
  17. 10.20396/san.v15i1.1825 · DOI
  18. Graziano da Silva José, 2010, The Fome Zero (Zero Hunger) program: The Brazilian experience
  19. 10.1177/227797601200100104 · DOI
  20. Jha Praveen, 2002, Land reforms in India: Issues of equity in rural Madhya Pradesh
  21. Jha Praveen, 2007, Land reform experiences: Lessons from across the globe
  22. Jha Praveen, 2010, Land question at the current juncture and some suggestions for reform
  23. 10.1177/227797601200100303 · DOI
  24. Mafeje Archie, 1991, The theory and ethnography of African social formations: The case of the interlacustrine kingdoms
  25. Mamdani Mahmood, 1996, Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism
  26. Mbilinyi Margaret, 1997, Engendering African social sciences
  27. Moyo Sam, 1995, The land question in Zimbabwe
  28. Moyo Sam, 2000, Land reform under structural adjustment in Zimbabwe: Land use change in the Mashonaland Provinces
  29. Moyo Sam, 2008, African land questions, agrarian transitions and the state: Contradictions of neoliberal land reforms
  30. Moyo Sam, 2008, The state of food security in Southern Africa
  31. Moyo Sam, 2012, Réponses radicales aux crises agraires et rurales africaines, 11
  32. Moyo Sam, 2012, Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond white-settler capitalism
  33. Moyo Sam, 1998, Economic policy reforms and meso-scale rural market changes in Zimbabwe: The case of Shamva District, 147
  34. Moyo Sam, 2002, Peasant organisations and change in rural Africa
  35. 10.5040/9781350222175 · DOI
  36. 10.1163/156920607X225924 · DOI
  37. Moyo Sam, 2012, Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe: beyond white-settler capitalism, 331
  38. 10.1080/03056240701340431 · DOI
  39. Moyo Sam, 2008, Recuperando la tierra: El resurgimento de movimientos rurales en África, Asia y América Latina
  40. Moyo Sam, 2011, Reclaiming the nation: The return of the national question in Africa, Asia and Latin America
  41. 10.1177/227797601200100203 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Moyo Sam, Africa’s diverse and changing land questions
  43. 10.1177/227797601200100103 · DOI
  44. Patnaik Utsa, 2006, Globalization under hegemony, 30
  45. Patnaik Utsa, 2011, Capitalism, colonialism and globalization
  46. Patnaik Utsa, 2011, The agrarian question in the neoliberal era: Primitive accumulation and the peasantry
  47. Rodney Walter, 1972, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa
  48. Rosa Marcelo, 2011, Engenho dos movimentos sociais: Reforma agrária e significação social na zona canavieira de Pernambuco
  49. Shivji Issa G., 2009, Accumulation in an African periphery: A theoretical framework
  50. Tsikata Dzodzi, 2009, Feminist Africa, 12, 11
  51. Tsikata Dzodzi, 2010, Land tenure, gender and globalisation: Research and analysis from Africa, Asia and Latin America
  52. Williams Eric, 1994, Capitalism and slavery
  53. 10.1177/227797601200100305 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moyo, S., Jha, P., & Yeros, P.
Affiliations
  • Sam Moyo is Executive Director of the African Institute for Agrarian Studies (AIAS), Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Praveen Jha is Chairperson of the Centre for Informal Sector and Labour Studies (CISLS) and faculty at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning (CESP), School of Social Sciences (SSS), Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, India.
  • Paris Yeros is Adjunct Professor of International Economics at the Federal University of ABC (UFABC), São Paulo, Brazil.
Venue
Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2013-04
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
93-119
ISSN
  • 2277-9760
  • 2321-0281
DOI
10.1177/2277976013477224
Cited by
98
References
2
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review