Cited by 43Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Small-Molecule Degraders beyond PROTACs—Challenges and Opportunities

Open access
Kastl, Johanna M., Davies, Gareth, Godsman, Eleanor, Holdgate, Geoffrey A.·2021·SLAS Discovery

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) is a recent strategy, utilizing the cell's proteostasis machinery to deplete specific proteins. This represents a paradigm shift in early drug discovery, away from occupancy-driven to event-driven mechanisms.Recent efforts have focused on the development of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs). These heterobifunctional molecules combine a target-specific binding moiety linked to an E3 ligase ligand and trigger selective ubiquitination of the target protein, marking it for proteasomal degradation. While these molecules can be highly efficacious, they generally have unfavorable physicochemical properties due to their large size.In contrast, smaller molecules that induce degradation could represent an attractive, simple option to overcoming the limitations of both traditional modulators and PROTACs. These molecules may have a range of mechanisms: recruitment of an E3 ligase (molecular glues), introduction of hydrophobic areas, or inducing local unfolding, each of which triggers degradation.We recently completed a high-throughput screen of 111,000 compounds in a cellular HiBiT assay in an effort to identify such molecules. Preliminary analysis indicates that we have been able to identify alternative small-molecule degraders. We highlight methods for triage, characterization, selectivity, and mode of action. In summary, we believe that these types of small-molecule degraders, which may possibly have more acceptable physicochemical properties than the inherently larger heterobifunctional molecules, are an exciting approach for inducing TPD, and we illustrate that a general screening approach can be successful in identifying useful start points for developing such molecules.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2472555221991104

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The success of PROTACs in hijacking the UPS for TPD has motivated research into other classes of heterobifunctional molecules that depend on non-UPS pathways to degrade a POI.

    “The success of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) in hijacking the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) for targeted protein degradation (TPD) has motivated research into other classes of heterobifunctional molecules that depend on non-UPS pathways to degrade a protein of interest (POI)246,247.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [247]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; et al. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Devel- opment Settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46, 3-26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kastl, J. M., Davies, G., Godsman, E., & Holdgate, G. A.
Affiliations
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Kastl, Johanna M.
Venue
SLAS Discovery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
524-533
ISSN
2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133088664
Cited by
43
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLAS DISCOVERY (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
targeted protein degradation, small-molecule degraders, PROTACs, molecular glues, protein unfolding, high-throughput screening, proteasomal degradation, physicochemical properties, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Proteostasis, Eukaryotic Cells, Humans, Ligands, Protein Binding, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Proteomics, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Small Molecule Libraries, Ubiquitination, Drug Discovery, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Protein Unfolding, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review