The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
Open accessAbstract
We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance ( p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion ( p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely high-powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This may contribute to publication bias, selective reporting, and questionable research practices that reduce the credibility of the published literature 18-25 .”
From Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Such heterogeneity is not uncommon, even if it is relatively small, in multisite replications in which heterogeneity can be directly estimated (Ebersole et al., 2020; Klein et al., 2018)”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Using similar criteria, the”
From Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement (2022) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Based on sample country or region, we categorized samples as Western or non-Western using previously established geographical categorizations [23,24].”
From Hasty generalizations and generics in medical research: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Among humans, different cultures and social groups differ in their moral foundations.”
From Exploring the psychology of LLMs’ moral and legal reasoning (2024) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 6×
“…& Gilovich, 2008) Moral Foundations of Liberals vs. Conservatives (Graham et al., 2009) Cardinal Direction & SES (Huang et al., 2014) Effect of Framing (Tversky & Kahneman, 1981) Less-Is-Better Effect (Hsee, 1998) Preferences for Formal vs. Intuitive Reasoning (Norenzayan et al., 2002) False…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBorenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 2×
“…pervasive low-powered research plus publication bias that favors positive over negative results (Button et al., 2013; Cohen, 1962; Greenwald, 1975; Rosenthal, 1979) and because of questionable research practices, such as p -hacking, that can inflate the likelihood of obtaining false positives…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1027/1864-9335/a000202 · DOI
- Klein R. A., 2014, Social Psychology, 45, 307, 10.1027/1864-9335/a000178 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-8284.00419 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1027/1864-9335/a000202 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 944
Creative destruction in science
Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., et al. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002 · Cited by 67
Self-citationLeichtmann, B., Nitsch, V., & Mara, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2022.838116 · Cited by 66
Meta‐analysis of social science research: A practitioner's guide
Iršová, Z., Doucouliagos, H., Havránek, T., & Stanley, T. D. (2023) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12595 · Cited by 76
Andersen, S. C., Gensowski, M., Ludeke, S. G., & John, O. P. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12538 · Cited by 66
Rung, J. M., Peck, S., Hinnenkamp, J. E., Preston, E., & Madden, G. J. (2019) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00200-7 · Cited by 65
Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully
Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920919667 · Cited by 62
Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition
Rahnev, D., Balsdon, T., Charles, L., de Gardelle, V., Denison, R., Desender, K., Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Fleming, S. M., Jehee, J., et al. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221075615 · Cited by 63
Fell, M. J., Pagel, L., Chen, C., Goldberg, M. H., Herberz, M., Huebner, G. M., Sareen, S., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646 · Cited by 62
Wu, J., Guo, Z., Gao, X., & Kou, Y. (2020) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.09.001 · Cited by 69
van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Bakker, M., Elsherif, M. M., Wong, T. K., & Wicherts, J. M. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02277-0 · Cited by 84
Rate and success of study replication in ecology and evolution
Kelly, C. D. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.7654 · Cited by 60
Fyfe, E. R., de Leeuw, J. R., Carvalho, P. F., Goldstone, R. L., Sherman, J., Admiraal, D., Alford, L. K., Bonner, A., Brassil, C. E., Brooks, C. A., et al. (2021) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459211027575 · Cited by 59
Global Perspective on Marital Satisfaction
Dobrowolska, M., Groyecka-Bernard, A., Sorokowski, P., Randall, A. K., Hilpert, P., Ahmadi, K., AlGhraibeh, A. M. A., Aryeetey, R., Bertoni, A., Bettache, K., et al. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12218817 · Cited by 68
Langenberg, B., Janczyk, M., Koob, V., Kliegl, R. M., & Mayer, A. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01902-8 · Cited by 88
Artner, R., Verliefde, T., Steegen, S., Gomes, S. L. B. T., Traets, F., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vanpaemel, W. (2020) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000365 · Cited by 77
Making Sense of Model Generalizability: A Tutorial on Cross-Validation in R and Shiny
Song, Q. C., Tang, C., & Wee, S. (2021) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920947067 · Cited by 64
Pictures and repeated exposure increase perceived accuracy of news headlines
Smelter, T. J., & Calvillo, D. P. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3684 · Cited by 58
Open Communication Science: A Primer on Why and Some Recommendations for How
Lewis, N. A. (2019) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2019.1685660 · Cited by 65
Self-citationGehlbach, H., & Robinson, C. D. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2021.1898961 · Cited by 62
Hensel, P. G. (2021) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.002 · Cited by 73
Tello, N., Harika-Germaneau, G., Serra, W., Jaafari, N., & Chatard, A. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619893062 · Cited by 54
Self-citationGould, E., Fraser, H. S., Parker, T. H., Nakagawa, S., Griffith, S. C., Vesk, P. A., Fidler, F. M., Hamilton, D. G., Abbey-Lee, R. N., Abbott, J. K., et al. (2025) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-024-02101-x · Cited by 79
Generalizability is not optional: insights from a cross-cultural study of social discounting
Tiokhin, L., Hackman, J., Munira, S., Jesmin, K., & Hruschka, D. J. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.181386 · Cited by 68
Philosophical Intuitions Are Surprisingly Stable Across both Demographic Groups and Situations
Knobe, J. (2021) · Filozofia Nauki · doi:10.14394/filnau.2021.0007 · Cited by 55
Open Science Promotes Diverse, Just, and Sustainable Research and Educational Outcomes
Grahe, J. E., Cuccolo, K., Leighton, D. C., & Alvarez, L. D. C. (2019) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725719869164 · Cited by 63
Self-citationManyBirds: A multi-site collaborative Open Science approach to avian cognition and behavior research
Lambert, M. L., Farrar, B. G., Garcia‐Pelegrin, E., Reber, S. A., & Miller, R. (2022) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.09.01.11.2022 · Cited by 59
Laurinavichyute, A., Yadav, H., & Vasishth, S. (2022) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2022.104332 · Cited by 76
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Delios, A., Clemente, E. G., Wu, T., Tan, H., Wang, Y., Gordon, M., Viganola, D., Chen, Z., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2120377119 · Cited by 66
Self-citationGüttinger, S. (2020) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-019-0269-1 · Cited by 72
Zakharin, M., & Bates, T. C. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258910 · Cited by 66
Almaatouq, A., Griffiths, T. L., Suchow, J. W., Whiting, M. E., Evans, J. A., & Watts, D. J. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/anjkm · Cited by 57
GPT and CLT: The impact of ChatGPT's level of abstraction on consumer recommendations
Kirshner, S. N. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103580 · Cited by 64
Doebel, S., & Frank, M. C. (2023) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2023.2270055 · Cited by 76
Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Bushman, B. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221121815 · Cited by 53
RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable
Protzko, J., Krosnick, J. A., Nelson, L. D., Nosek, B. A., Axt, J. R., Berent, M., Buttrick, N. R., DeBell, M., Ebersole, C. R., Lundmark, S., et al. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9 · Cited by 97
Self-citationRetractedOpen science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health
Hicks, D. (2021) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1962713 · Cited by 56
Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences
Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Sugerman, E. R., & Johnson, E. J. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2306281121 · Cited by 60
Distributed semantic representations for modeling human judgment
Bhatia, S., Richie, R., & Zou, W. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.020 · Cited by 57
A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures
Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060 · Cited by 54
Self-citationMoral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC)
McHugh, C., McGann, M., Igou, E. R., & Kinsella, E. L. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691621990636 · Cited by 52
Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology
Chin, J. M., Pickett, J. T., Vazire, S., & Holcombe, A. O. (2021) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-021-09525-6 · Cited by 66
Communicating What We Know and What Isn’t So: Science Communication in Psychology
Lewis, N. A., & Wai, J. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620964062 · Cited by 52
Self-citationPremachandra, B., & Lewis, N. A. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620974774 · Cited by 47
Self-citationWyatt, T. D. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0262 · Cited by 52
Quantitative Political Science Research Is Greatly Underpowered
Arel‐Bundock, V., Briggs, R. C., Doucouliagos, H., Aviña, M. M., & Stanley, T. D. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/734279 · Cited by 54
High Replicability of Newly-Discovered Social-behavioral Findings is AchievablePreprint
Protzko, J., Krosnick, J. A., Nelson, L. D., Nosek, B. A., Axt, J. R., Berent, M. K., Buttrick, N., DeBell, M., Ebersole, C. R., Lundmark, S., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n2a9x · Cited by 48
Self-citationBüttner, F., Toomey, E. C., McClean, S., Roe, M., & Delahunt, E. (2020) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-101863 · Cited by 56
Interaction, Feedback and Task Research in Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589284 · Cited by 62
Competition and moral behavior: A meta-analysis of forty-five crowd-sourced experimental designs
Huber, C., Dreber, A., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Weitzel, U., Abellán, M., Adayeva, X., Ay, F. C., Barron, K., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2215572120 · Cited by 52
What Can We Learn from Many Labs Replications?
Stroebe, W. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1577736 · Cited by 50
Chopra, F., Haaland, I., Roth, C., & Stegmann, A. (2023) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uead060 · Cited by 57
DeKay, M. L., Rubinchik, N., Li, Z., & de Boeck, P. A. L. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221079611 · Cited by 51
Revisiting the rigidity-of-the-right hypothesis: A meta-analytic review.
Costello, T. H., Bowes, S. M., Baldwin, M. W., Malka, A., & Tasimi, A. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000446 · Cited by 58
Flexible yet fair: blinding analyses in experimental psychology
Dutilh, G., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02456-7 · Cited by 52
Gordon, M., Viganola, D., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Dreber, A., Goldfedder, B., Holzmeister, F., Johannesson, M., Liu, Y., Twardy, C. R., et al. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.200566 · Cited by 47
Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory
Gervais, W. M. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620977471 · Cited by 50
What reduces prejudice in the real world? A meta‐analysis of prejudice reduction field experiments
Hsieh, W., Faulkner, N., & Wickes, R. L. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12509 · Cited by 51
Heterogeneity in banker culture and its influence on dishonesty
Rahwan, Z., Yoeli, E., & Fasolo, B. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1741-y · Cited by 42
Vize, C. E., Sharpe, B. M., Miller, J. D., Lynam, D., & Soto, C. (2022) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070221111857 · Cited by 33
Local warming is real: A meta-analysis of the effect of recent temperature on climate change beliefs
Sugerman, E. R., Li, Y., & Johnson, E. J. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.015 · Cited by 49
Methodologies for Monitoring Mental Health on Twitter: Systematic Review
Cara, N. H. D., Maggio, V., Davis, O. S. P., & Haworth, C. M. A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42734 · Cited by 50
When and Why to Replicate: As Easy as 1, 2, 3?
Field, S. M., Hoekstra, R., Bringmann, L. F., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2019) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.218 · Cited by 45
Jamison, J. M., Yay, T., & Feldman, G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103977 · Cited by 45
Establishing psychological universals
Majid, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00169-w · Cited by 43
Cui, Z., Li, N., & Zhou, H. (2025) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-025-00840-7 · Cited by 65
Improving practices and inferences in developmental cognitive neuroscience
Flournoy, J. C., Vijayakumar, N., Cheng, T. W., Cosme, D., Flannery, J., & Pfeifer, J. H. (2020) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100807 · Cited by 41
The Role of Replication Studies in Theory Building
Irvine, E. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620970558 · Cited by 55
Competitive gossip: the impact of domain, resource value, resource scarcity and coalitions
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0305 · Cited by 43
van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000415 · Cited by 42
Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences
Tyner, A. H., Abatayo, A. L., Daley, M., Field, S., Fox, N. W., Haber, N., Hahn, K. M., Struhl, M. K., Mawhinney, B., Miske, O., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10078-y · Cited by 54
Self-citationRichie, R., White, B., Bhatia, S., & Hout, M. C. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01362-y · Cited by 40
Hantula, D. A. (2019) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00194-2 · Cited by 40
Mathematically aggregating experts’ predictions of possible futures
Hanea, A. M., Wilkinson, D. P., McBride, M. F., Lyon, A., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Thorn, F. S., Gray, C. T., Mandel, D. R., Willcox, A., Gould, E., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256919 · Cited by 38
Hobson, H., Linden, A. H., Crane, L., & Kalandadze, T. (2023) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102196 · Cited by 44
A framework for evaluating reproducibility and replicability in economics
Dreber, A., & Johannesson, M. (2024) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.13244 · Cited by 49
Koç, M. S., Aka, B. T., Doğruyol, B., Curtiss, J. E., Carpenter, J. K., & Hofmann, S. G. (2019) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-019-09732-3 · Cited by 39
Evidence of general economic principles of bargaining and trade from 2,000 classroom experiments
Lin, P.-H., Brown, A. L., Imai, T., Wang, J. T., Wang, S. W., & Camerer, C. F. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0916-8 · Cited by 39
The role of theory in researching and understanding human communication
Levine, T. R., & Markowitz, D. M. (2023) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqad037 · Cited by 38
Conducting Web-Based Experiments for Numerical Cognition Research
Kochari, A. R. (2019) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.85 · Cited by 40
A visual tool for defining reproducibility and replicability
Patil, P., Peng, R. D., & Leek, J. T. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0629-z · Cited by 38
Toward Open and Reproducible Epidemiology
Mathur, M. B., & Fox, M. P. (2023) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwad007 · Cited by 50
Measurement practices in large-scale replications: Insights from Many Labs 2.
Shaw, M., Cloos, L., Luong, R., Elbaz, S., & Flake, J. K. (2020) · Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/cap0000220 · Cited by 43
Guidelines to improve internationalization in the psychological sciences
Puthillam, A., Doble, L. J. M., Santos, J. J. I. D., Elsherif, M. M., Steltenpohl, C. N., Moreau, D., Pownall, M., Silverstein, P., Anand-Vembar, S., & Kapoor, H. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12847 · Cited by 40
The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and InclusivePreprint
Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C. L., Remedios, J. D., Cheryan, S., Diekman, A. B., Dutra, N. B., Goh, J. X., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gdzue · Cited by 37
Self-citationSommet, N., Weissman, D. L., Cheutin, N., & Elliot, A. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xhe3u · Cited by 36
Self-Esteem in 60 Seconds: The Six-Item State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES-6)
Webster, G. D., Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191120958059 · Cited by 36
Meta-analyses in psychology often overestimate evidence for and size of effects
Bartos̆, F., Maier, M., Shanks, D. R., Stanley, T. D., Sladekova, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230224 · Cited by 57
Primer for Experimental Methods in Organization Theory
Levine, S. S., Schilke, O. S., Kacperczyk, A. J., & Zucker, L. G. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.18093 · Cited by 37
A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science
Ghai, S., Thériault, R., Forscher, P., Shoda, Y., Syed, M., Puthillam, A., Peng, H. C., Basnight-Brown, D., Majid, A., Azevedo, F., et al. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00179-1 · Cited by 32
Kong, X., ENIGMA Laterality Working Group, & Francks, C. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25154 · Cited by 34
Röseler, L., Schütz, A., Blank, P. A., Dück, M., Fels, S., Kupfer, J., Scheelje, L., & Seida, C. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104066 · Cited by 36
A Replication Study of Operations Management Experiments in Management Science
Davis, A. M., Flicker, B., Hyndman, K., Katok, E., Keppler, S. M., Leider, S., Long, X., & Tong, J. D. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.4866 · Cited by 38
A partial solution for the replication crisis in economics
Briggs, W. M. (2023) · Asian Journal of Economics and Banking · doi:10.1108/ajeb-03-2023-0027 · Cited by 38
Heirene, R. M. (2020) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2020.1751130 · Cited by 39
A Multilab Replication of the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance
Vaidis, D. C., Sleegers, W. W. A., van Leeuwen, F., DeMarree, K. G., Sætrevik, B., Ross, R. M., Schmidt, K., Protzko, J., Morvinski, C., Ghasemi, O., et al. (2024) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459231213375 · Cited by 40
Self-citationAI-Driven Mediation Strategies for Audience Depolarisation in Online Debates
Govers, J., Velloso, E., Kostakos, V., & Gonçalves, J. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642322 · Cited by 49
Design and Analysis of Replication Studies
Bonett, D. G. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120911088 · Cited by 34
Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
Schauer, J. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000232 · Cited by 35
Isolating the sources of pipeline‐variability in group‐level task‐fMRI results
Bowring, A., Nichols, T. E., & Maumet, C. (2021) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25713 · Cited by 38
The Effect of Replications on Citation Patterns: Evidence From a Large-Scale Reproducibility Project
Schafmeister, F. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211005767 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., Rédei, A. C., Cai, H., Cambier, F., Cantarero, K., Carmichael, C. L., Ceric, F., Chandler, J., Chang, J.-H., Chatard, A., Chen, E. E., Cheong, W., Cicero, D. C., Coen, S., Coleman, J. A., Collisson, B., Conway, M. A., Corker, K. S., Curran, P. G., Cushman, F., Dagona, Z. K., Dalgar, I., Dalla Rosa, A., Davis, W. E., de Bruijn, M., De Schutter, L., Devos, T., de Vries, M., Doğulu, C., Dozo, N., Dukes, K. N., Dunham, Y., Durrheim, K., Ebersole, C. R., Edlund, J. E., Eller, A., English, A. S., Finck, C., Frankowska, N., Freyre, M.-Á., Friedman, M., Galliani, E. M., Gandi, J. C., Ghoshal, T., Giessner, S. R., Gill, T., Gnambs, T., Gómez, Á., González, R., Graham, J., Grahe, J. E., Grahek, I., Green, E. G. T., Hai, K., Haigh, M., Haines, E. L., Hall, M. P., Heffernan, M. E., Hicks, J. A., Houdek, P., Huntsinger, J. R., Huynh, H. P., IJzerman, H., Inbar, Y., Innes-Ker, Å. H., Jiménez-Leal, W., John, M.-S., Joy-Gaba, J. A., Kamiloğlu, R. G., Kappes, H. B., Karabati, S., Karick, H., Keller, V. N., Kende, A., Kervyn, N., Knežević, G., Kovacs, C., Krueger, L. E., Kurapov, G., Kurtz, J., Lakens, D., Lazarević, L. B., Levitan, C. A., Lewis, N. A., Lins, S., Lipsey, N. P., Losee, J. E., Maassen, E., Maitner, A. T., Malingumu, W., Mallett, R. K., Marotta, S. A., Međedović, J., Mena-Pacheco, F., Milfont, T. L., Morris, W. L., Murphy, S. C., Myachykov, A., Neave, N., Neijenhuijs, K., Nelson, A. J., Neto, F., Lee Nichols, A., Ocampo, A., O’Donnell, S. L., Oikawa, H., Oikawa, M., Ong, E., Orosz, G., Osowiecka, M., Packard, G., Pérez-Sánchez, R., Petrović, B., Pilati, R., Pinter, B., Podesta, L., Pogge, G., Pollmann, M. M. H., Rutchick, A. M., Saavedra, P., Saeri, A. K., Salomon, E., Schmidt, K., Schönbrodt, F. D., Sekerdej, M. B., Sirlopú, D., Skorinko, J. L. M., Smith, M. A., Smith-Castro, V., Smolders, K. C. H. J., Sobkow, A., Sowden, W., Spachtholz, P., Srivastava, M., Steiner, T. G., Stouten, J., Street, C. N. H., Sundfelt, O. K., Szeto, S., Szumowska, E., Tang, A. C. W., Tanzer, N., Tear, M. J., Theriault, J., Thomae, M., Torres, D., Traczyk, J., Tybur, J. M., Ujhelyi, A., van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van der Hulst, M., van Lange, P. A. M., van ’t Veer, A. E., Vásquez- Echeverría, A., Ann Vaughn, L., Vázquez, A., Vega, L. D., Verniers, C., Verschoor, M., Voermans, I. P. J., Vranka, M. A., Welch, C., Wichman, A. L., Williams, L. A., Wood, M., Woodzicka, J. A., Wronska, M. K., Young, L., Zelenski, J. M., Zhijia, Z., & Nosek, B. A.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie: Personnalité, Cognition, Changement Social (FR)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Yaşar University (TR)
- American University of Sharjah (AE)
- Duke University (US)
- United Arab Emirates University (AE)
- Prague University of Economics and Business (CZ)
- Saint Joseph's University (US)
- Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
- California State University, San Marcos (US)
- Warsaw Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
- Department of General and Applied Psychology, University of Jos
- Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- UCLouvain (BE)
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad del Desarrollo
- University of Michigan (US)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- HELP University (MY)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of Salford (GB)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Azusa Pacific University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Grand Valley State University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Jos (NG)
- Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University
- Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua
- Wittenberg University (US)
- Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg University
- Leadership and Human Resource Management, WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management
- San Diego State University (US)
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen
- Başkent University (TR)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Allegheny College (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- Shanghai International Studies University (CN)
- Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
- Baruch College (US)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
- University of Utah (US)
- Pacific Lutheran University (US)
- Ghent University (BE)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Amity University (IN)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- William Paterson University (US)
- Lurie Children's Hospital (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem (CZ)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Department of Business Administration, Istanbul Bilgi University
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- East Texas A&M University (US)
- James Madison University (US)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Occidental College (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Open University of Tanzania (TZ)
- Tufts University (US)
- Singidunum University (RS)
- Latin University of Costa Rica (CR)
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- McDaniel College (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida
- George Fox University (US)
- Doshisha University (JP)
- Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK)
- Stanford University (US)
- Institute for Psychological Research, University of Costa Rica
- Institute of Criminological & Sociological Research (RS)
- California State University, Northridge (US)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Monash University (AU)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Jagiellonian University (PL)
- Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
- Wroclaw Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
- Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
- University of Regensburg (DE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Northeastern University (US)
- University of Winchester (GB)
- Universidad Iberoamericana (MX)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University
- Centro de Investigación Básica en Psicología, Universidad de la República
- Department of Psychology, Ithaca College
- Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Charles University (CZ)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Washington and Lee University (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Carleton University (CA)
- Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- Center for Open Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klein, Richard A.
- ORCID
- Klein, Richard A.
- Vianello, Michelangelo
- Hasselman, Fred
- Adams, Byron G.
- Adams, Reginald B.
- Alper, Sinan
- Aveyard, Mark
- Axt, Jordan R.
- Babalola, Mayowa T.
- Bahník, Štěpán
- Batra, Rishtee
- Berkics, Mihály
- Bernstein, Michael J.
- Berry, Daniel R.
- Bocian, Konrad
- Brandt, Mark J.
- Rédei, Anna Cabak
- Cai, Huajian
- Cambier, Fanny
- Cantarero, Katarzyna
- Carmichael, Cheryl L.
- Chandler, Jesse
- Chang, Jen-Ho
- Chatard, Armand
- Chen, Eva E.
- Cicero, David C.
- Coen, Sharon
- Coleman, Jennifer A.
- Collisson, Brian
- Conway, Morgan A.
- Corker, Katherine S.
- Curran, Paul G.
- Cushman, Fiery
- Devos, Thierry
- Doğulu, Canay
- Dukes, Kristin Nicole
- Dunham, Yarrow
- Durrheim, Kevin
- Ebersole, Charles R.
- Edlund, John E.
- English, Alexander Scott
- Finck, Carolyn
- Frankowska, Natalia
- Freyre, Miguel-Ángel
- Galliani, Elisa Maria
- Gandi, Joshua C.
- Ghoshal, Tanuka
- Giessner, Steffen R.
- Gill, Tripat
- Gnambs, Timo
- Gómez, Ángel
- González, Roberto
- Graham, Jesse
- Grahek, Ivan
- Green, Eva G. T.
- Haigh, Matthew
- Haines, Elizabeth L.
- Heffernan, Marie E.
- Hicks, Joshua A.
- Houdek, Petr
- Huynh, Ho Phi
- IJzerman, Hans
- Inbar, Yoel
- Innes-Ker, Åse H.
- John, Melissa-Sue
- Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A.
- Kappes, Heather Barry
- Keller, Victor N.
- Kende, Anna
- Kervyn, Nicolas
- Knežević, Goran
- Kovacs, Carrie
- Krueger, Lacy E.
- Lakens, Daniël
- Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
- Levitan, Carmel A.
- Lewis, Neil A.
- Lins, Samuel
- Lipsey, Nikolette P.
- Losee, Joy E.
- Maassen, Esther
- Maitner, Angela T.
- Malingumu, Winfrida
- Mallett, Robyn K.
- Marotta, Satia A.
- Međedović, Janko
- Milfont, Taciano L.
- Morris, Wendy L.
- Murphy, Sean C.
- Myachykov, Andriy
- Neave, Nick
- Neijenhuijs, Koen
- Neto, Félix
- Ong, Elsie
- Orosz, Gábor
- Packard, Grant
- Petrović, Boban
- Pilati, Ronaldo
- Podesta, Lysandra
- Pogge, Gabrielle
- Pollmann, Monique M. H.
- Rutchick, Abraham M.
- Saavedra, Patricio
- Saeri, Alexander K.
- Salomon, Erika
- Schmidt, Kathleen
- Schönbrodt, Felix D.
- Sekerdej, Maciej B.
- Sirlopú, David
- Skorinko, Jeanine L. M.
- Smith, Michael A.
- Smolders, Karin C. H. J.
- Sowden, Walter
- Steiner, Troy G.
- Stouten, Jeroen
- Street, Chris N. H.
- Szeto, Stephanie
- Szumowska, Ewa
- Tanzer, Norbert
- Tear, Morgan J.
- Theriault, Jordan
- Thomae, Manuela
- Torres, David
- Traczyk, Jakub
- Tybur, Joshua M.
- Ujhelyi, Adrienn
- Vázquez, Alexandra
- Vega, Luis Diego
- Verniers, Catherine
- Verschoor, Mark
- Vranka, Marek A.
- Wichman, Aaron L.
- Williams, Lisa A.
- Wood, Michael
- Woodzicka, Julie A.
- Wronska, Marta K.
- Young, Liane
- Zelenski, John M.
- Nosek, Brian A.
- Venue
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-490
- ISSN
- 2515-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2467
- OpenAlex
- W2776961836
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 142
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 79.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (acceptedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (acceptedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (acceptedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons - George Fox University (George Fox University) (submittedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Tilburg University Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Association for Psychological Science
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- replication, effect size heterogeneity, setting effects, pre-registered replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review