The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
Open accessAbstract
We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance ( p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion ( p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely high-powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This may contribute to publication bias, selective reporting, and questionable research practices that reduce the credibility of the published literature 18-25 .”
From Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Such heterogeneity is not uncommon, even if it is relatively small, in multisite replications in which heterogeneity can be directly estimated (Ebersole et al., 2020; Klein et al., 2018)”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Using similar criteria, the”
From Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement (2022) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Based on sample country or region, we categorized samples as Western or non-Western using previously established geographical categorizations [23,24].”
From Hasty generalizations and generics in medical research: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Among humans, different cultures and social groups differ in their moral foundations.”
From Exploring the psychology of LLMs’ moral and legal reasoning (2024) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 6×
“…& Gilovich, 2008) Moral Foundations of Liberals vs. Conservatives (Graham et al., 2009) Cardinal Direction & SES (Huang et al., 2014) Effect of Framing (Tversky & Kahneman, 1981) Less-Is-Better Effect (Hsee, 1998) Preferences for Formal vs. Intuitive Reasoning (Norenzayan et al., 2002) False…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBorenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 2×
“…pervasive low-powered research plus publication bias that favors positive over negative results (Button et al., 2013; Cohen, 1962; Greenwald, 1975; Rosenthal, 1979) and because of questionable research practices, such as p -hacking, that can inflate the likelihood of obtaining false positives…”
BackgroundEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 · Cited by 8,515
A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1 · Cited by 8,307
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 2×
“They can also occur because of pervasive lowpowered research plus publication bias that favors positive over negative results (Button et al., 2013; Cohen, 1962; Greenwald, 1975; Rosenthal, 1979) and because of questionable research practices, such as p-hacking, that can inflate the likelihood of obtaining false positi…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSimmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
(2023) · doi:10.1126/science · Cited by 6,063
D., C. P., Rosch, E. H., & Lloyd, B. (1979) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421578 · Cited by 5,319
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 · Cited by 5,080
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
Self-citationWEIRD languages have misled us, too
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1000018x · Cited by 4,177
Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115 · Cited by 4,037
Principles of topological psychology.
Lewin, K. (1936) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · doi:10.1037/10019-000 · Cited by 3,938
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865
Review of personality and social psychology
Wheeler, L. S., & Shaver, P. R. (1980) · UMI Books on Demand · Cited by 3,593
Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.
Snyder, C. R. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321 · Cited by 3,584
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x · Cited by 3,139
Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201272002 · Cited by 3,041
Redefine statistical significance
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z · Cited by 2,772
Self-citationPromoting an open research culture
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab2374 · Cited by 2,708
Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient
Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. L., & Syme, S. L. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.1.15 · Cited by 2,383
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611430953 · Cited by 2,239
At what sample size do correlations stabilize?
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009 · Cited by 2,232
Self-citationThe person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3604 · Cited by 2,205
The preregistration revolution
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708274114 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationGilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21 · Cited by 1,897
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0 · Cited by 1,783 · cited 2×
“For example, people tend to attribute behavior to characteristics of the person rather than characteristics of the situation (e.g., Gilbert & Malone, 1995; Jones & Harris, 1967), but some evidence suggests that this effect is stronger in Western than in Eastern cultures (Miyamoto & Kitayama, 2002).”
BackgroundHaidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · Cited by 1,632
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1660 · Cited by 1,529
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., et al. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z · Cited by 1,521
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Forsell, E., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Almenberg, J., Altmejd, A., Chan, T., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf0918 · Cited by 1,314
Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead
Rücker, G., Schwarzer, G., Carpenter, J. R., & Schumacher, M. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-79 · Cited by 1,287
The Generalizability of Survey Experiments
Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Jeremy Freese, A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2015.19 · Cited by 1,248
Van Lange, P. A. M., De Bruin, E. M. N., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733 · Cited by 1,209
Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., et al. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000178 · Cited by 1,208
Self-citationWashing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing
Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130726 · Cited by 1,200
Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples
Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4 · Cited by 1,123
Measuring Social Value OrientationPreprint
Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K., & Handgraaf, M. (2011) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1804189 · Cited by 1,099
A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H. J. E. M., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C., Birt, A. R., Brand, R., Brand, M., Brewer, G., Bruyneel, S. D., et al. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616652873 · Cited by 1,097
On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733 · Cited by 1,088
Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language
Knobe, J. (2003) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/63.3.190 · Cited by 1,046
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612463078 · Cited by 1,042
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 4×
“Consider the context, in which positive results are perceived as more publishable than negative results (Greenwald, 1975) and common analytic practices may inadvertently increase the likelihood of obtaining false positives (Simmons et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialChandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7 · Cited by 950
Self-citationHuman Research and Data Collection via the Internet
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601 · Cited by 927
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569 · Cited by 844
The Disgust Scale: item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement.
Olatunji, B., Williams, N. L., Tolin, D., Abramowitz, J., Sawchuk, C. N., Lohr, J., & Elwood, L. S. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281 · Cited by 833
Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk
Rottenstreich, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00334 · Cited by 825
Small Telescopes: Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results
Simonsohn, U. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614567341 · Cited by 742
Objective Confirmation of Subjective Measures of Human Well-Being: Evidence from the U.S.A.
Oswald, A., & Wu, S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180606 · Cited by 730
Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000192 · Cited by 716 · cited 1×
“Following the Registered Report model (Nosek & Lakens, 2014), prior to data collection we submitted the materials and protocols to formal peer review in a process conducted by this journal’s Editor.”
MethodSelf-citationApproach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of Attention
Gable, P. A., & Harmon‐Jones, E. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x · Cited by 702
Subjective Well‐Being: The Convergence and Stability of Self‐Report and Non‐Self‐Report Measures
Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00283.x · Cited by 687
Behavioral Priming: It’s all in the Mind, but whose Mind?
Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C.-L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029081 · Cited by 670
A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications
HAUSER, M., CUSHMAN, F., YOUNG, L., KANG‐XING JIN, R., & MIKHAIL, J. (2007) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x · Cited by 666
Self-citationThe alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication
Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613514450 · Cited by 597
Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients.
Gray, K. J., & Wegner, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013748 · Cited by 594
Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others
Shafir, E. (1993) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197186 · Cited by 573
(1990) · Cited by 561
Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
Miguel, E. A., Camerer, C. F., Casey, K., Cohen, J., Esterling, K., Gerber, A. S., Glennerster, R., GREEN, D. P., Humphreys, M., Imbens, G. W., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1245317 · Cited by 559
Self-citationAnderson, C. P., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. J. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434537 · Cited by 546
Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2605_4 · Cited by 534
Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.”
Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S., & Wilson, T. D. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad7243 · Cited by 474 · cited 1×
“…to replicate when there have been no empirical tests of whether such moderators are operative (Baumeister & Vohs, 2016; Crisp, Miles, & Husnu, 2014; Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, & Wilson, 2016; Ramscar, Shaoul, & Baayen, 2015; Schwarz & Clore, 2016; Stroebe & Strack, 2014; Van Bavel et al., 2016).”
Lucas, R. E., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2012) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9783-z · Cited by 468
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., Baranski, E., Bernstein, M. J., Bonfiglio, D. B. V., Boucher, L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012 · Cited by 468
Self-citationDisgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0015960 · Cited by 466
Self-citationHidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies
Cramer, A. O. J., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Waldorp, L., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0913-5 · Cited by 440
The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests
Mullen, B. R., Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E., & Vanderklok, M. (1985) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90020-4 · Cited by 417
How warm days increase belief in global warming
Zaval, L., Keenan, E. A., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2093 · Cited by 412
Fraley, R. C., & Vazire, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109019 · Cited by 409
Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational Logic Analysis
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., & Mai, H.-P. (1991) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269239 · Cited by 400
Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
Van Bavel, J. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Brady, W. J., & Reinero, D. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521897113 · Cited by 398
Less is better: when low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options
Hsee, C. K. (1998) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199806)11:2 · Cited by 379
Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032633275-7 · Cited by 370
Objective and subjective socioeconomic status and susceptibility to the common cold.
Cohen, S., Alper, C. M., Doyle, W. J., Adler, N., Treanor, J. J., & Turner, R. B. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.268 · Cited by 334
Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
Dreber, A., Pfeiffer, T., Almenberg, J., Isaksson, S., Wilson, B., Chen, Y., Nosek, B. A., & Johannesson, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1516179112 · Cited by 331
Huang, J. L. W., Bowling, N. A., Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2014) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9357-6 · Cited by 315
The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology
Knobe, J. (2006) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-004-4510-0 · Cited by 311
High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated
Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.001 · Cited by 292
Self-citationThe Illusory Transparency of Intention: Linguistic Perspective Taking in Text
Keysar, B. (1994) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1994.1006 · Cited by 291
Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory
Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Chung‐Herrera, B. G., Nadler, K., & Bradshaw, K. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.012 · Cited by 255
Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity
Krupnikov, Y., & Levine, A. S. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2014.7 · Cited by 251
Cuing Consumerism: Situational Materialism Undermines Personal and Social Well-Being
Bauer, M. A., Wilkie, J. E. B., Kim, J. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611429579 · Cited by 249
Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.415 · Cited by 239
Construct Validation of a Short Five-Factor Model Instrument
Muck, P. M., Hell, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2007) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166 · Cited by 229
Reaction time effects in lab- versus Web-based research: Experimental evidence
Hilbig, B. E. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0678-9 · Cited by 224
Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment
Dandurand, F., Shultz, T. R., & Onishi, K. H. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.2.428 · Cited by 215
Political Science Research Methods
Clark, C. (2013) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/8761 · Cited by 212
Miyamoto, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1239 · Cited by 208
‘Seek and ye shall find’: antecedents of assimilation and contrast in social comparison
Mussweiler, T. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.75 · Cited by 202
Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults.
Finucane, M. L., & Gullion, C. M. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0019106 · Cited by 202
Incidental environmental anchors
Critcher, C. R., & Gilovich, T. D. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.586 · Cited by 190
The Ease-of-Processing Heuristic and the Stability Bias
Kornell, N., Rhodes, M. G., Castel, A. D., & Tauber, S. K. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611407929 · Cited by 186
Misguided Effort With Elusive Implications
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616652878 · Cited by 183
Gnambs, T. (2014) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.003 · Cited by 170
Self-citationResearchers’ Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research
Bakker, M., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Wicherts, J. M., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616647519 · Cited by 158
Optimal design in psychological research.
McClelland, G. H. (1997) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.1.3 · Cited by 157
When Focusing on Differences Leads to Similar Perspectives
Todd, A. R., Hanko, K., Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610392929 · Cited by 149
Savani, K., Markus, H. R., Naidu, N. V. R., Kumar, S., & Berlia, N. V. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797609359908 · Cited by 141
Optimism about Love Relationships: General vs Specific Lessons from One's Personal Experiences
Carnelley, K. B., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407592091001 · Cited by 139
Why people are reluctant to tempt fate.
Risen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.293 · Cited by 138
Morsanyi, K., & Handley, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0026099 · Cited by 126
Hofmans, J., Kuppens, P., & Allïk, J. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.004 · Cited by 125
Uleman, J. S., Rhee, E., Bardoliwalla, N., Semin, G. R., & Toyama, M. (2000) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/1467-839x.00052 · Cited by 118
Does Cleanliness Influence Moral Judgments?
Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F., & Donnellan, M. B. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000186 · Cited by 105
Predicting replication outcomes in the Many Labs 2 study
Forsell, E., Viganola, D., Pfeiffer, T., Almenberg, J., Wilson, B., Chen, Y., Nosek, B. A., Johannesson, M., & Dreber, A. (2018) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.10.009 · Cited by 101
Self-citationKay, A. C., Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Landau, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0034462 · Cited by 93
Üskül, A. K., Hynie, M., & Lalonde, R. N. (2004) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022103262243 · Cited by 83
Monin, B., Oppenheimer, D. M., Ferguson, M. J., Carter, T. J., Hassin, R. R., Crisp, R., Miles, E., Husnu, S., Schwarz, N., Strack, F., et al. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000202 · Cited by 77
Self-citationPope, J. W. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp219 · Cited by 76
Big Five Content Representation of the Japanese Version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory
Oshio, A., Abe, S., Cutrone, P., & Gosling, S. D. (2013) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2013.412133 · Cited by 75
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Five Factor Form
Rojas, S. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113517260 · Cited by 71
Why Most Of Psychology Is Statistically Unfalsifiable
Morey, R., & Lakens, D. (2016) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.838685 · Cited by 63
Self-citationTranslation and validation of the Ten-Item-Personality Inventory into Spanish and Catalan
Ruiz, V. R., Oberst, U. E., Gosling, S. D., Rusiñol, J., & Lusar, A. C. (2013) · RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · Cited by 62
Why Most Of Psychology Is Statistically Unfalsifiable
Morey, R., & Lakens, D. (2016) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.838684 · Cited by 53
Self-citationVeenhoven, R. (2008) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8569-7_5 · Cited by 49
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale
Aron, A. P., Aron, E. N. A. D. T., & Smollan, D. (1992) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t03963-000 · Cited by 47
Who I Am Depends on How I Feel
Ashton-James, C. E., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chartrand, T. L. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02299.x · Cited by 36
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014) · Cited by 36
Effects of Mood and Elaboration on Processing and Evaluation of Goal‐Framed Appeals
Putrevu, S. (2014) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20682 · Cited by 32
In Search of an Association Between Conception Risk and Prejudice
Hawkins, C. B., Fitzgerald, C. E., & Nosek, B. A. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614553121 · Cited by 32
Self-citationSpatial Metaphor and Real Estate
Meier, B. P., Moller, A. C., Chen, J. J., & Riemer-Peltz, M. (2011) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611401042 · Cited by 32
Hostility in neurotics and normals.
Watson, R. E., Pritzker, L., & Madison, P. (1955) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0041326 · Cited by 27
Bray, S., & Madonna (2013) · Cited by 27
Evaluating Psychological Research Requires More Than Attention to the N
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616653102 · Cited by 20
Ferguson, M. J., Carter, T. J., & Hassin, R. R. (2014) · Cited by 19
Support for the replicability of imagined contact effects
Crisp, R. J., Miles, E., & Husnu, S. (2014) · Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) · Cited by 14
Huang, Y., Tse, C., & Cho, K. W. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2013 · Cited by 10
The international scale interval study
Veenhoven, R. (2009) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 8
Commentary on Ebersole et al. (2016)
Kahneman, D. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.002 · Cited by 2
Barbero (2014) · doi:10.1016/j · Cited by 1
(2018) · Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) · doi:10.1371/journal
Сучасний підхід до проблеми виникнення університету як соціокультурного феномену
Aslan (2018) · Electronic Volyn National University Institutional Repository · doi:10.5281/zenodo
(2015) · Industrial Development Report · doi:10.18356/a1cf26ea-en
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1027/1864-9335/a000202 · DOI
- Klein R. A., 2014, Social Psychology, 45, 307, 10.1027/1864-9335/a000178 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-8284.00419 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1027/1864-9335/a000202 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., et al. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z · Cited by 1,521
Brysbaert, M. (2019) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.72 · Cited by 996
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Kline Struhl, M., Nuijten, M. B., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 · Cited by 770
Self-citationMuthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620916782 · Cited by 704
Jusup, M., Holme, P., Kanazawa, K., Takayasu, M., Romić, I., Wang, Z., Geček, S., Lipić, T., Boris Podobnik, A., Wang, L., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.005 · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., Rédei, A. C., Cai, H., Cambier, F., Cantarero, K., Carmichael, C. L., Ceric, F., Chandler, J., Chang, J.-H., Chatard, A., Chen, E. E., Cheong, W., Cicero, D. C., Coen, S., Coleman, J. A., Collisson, B., Conway, M. A., Corker, K. S., Curran, P. G., Cushman, F., Dagona, Z. K., Dalgar, I., Dalla Rosa, A., Davis, W. E., de Bruijn, M., De Schutter, L., Devos, T., de Vries, M., Doğulu, C., Dozo, N., Dukes, K. N., Dunham, Y., Durrheim, K., Ebersole, C. R., Edlund, J. E., Eller, A., English, A. S., Finck, C., Frankowska, N., Freyre, M.-Á., Friedman, M., Galliani, E. M., Gandi, J. C., Ghoshal, T., Giessner, S. R., Gill, T., Gnambs, T., Gómez, Á., González, R., Graham, J., Grahe, J. E., Grahek, I., Green, E. G. T., Hai, K., Haigh, M., Haines, E. L., Hall, M. P., Heffernan, M. E., Hicks, J. A., Houdek, P., Huntsinger, J. R., Huynh, H. P., IJzerman, H., Inbar, Y., Innes-Ker, Å. H., Jiménez-Leal, W., John, M.-S., Joy-Gaba, J. A., Kamiloğlu, R. G., Kappes, H. B., Karabati, S., Karick, H., Keller, V. N., Kende, A., Kervyn, N., Knežević, G., Kovacs, C., Krueger, L. E., Kurapov, G., Kurtz, J., Lakens, D., Lazarević, L. B., Levitan, C. A., Lewis, N. A., Lins, S., Lipsey, N. P., Losee, J. E., Maassen, E., Maitner, A. T., Malingumu, W., Mallett, R. K., Marotta, S. A., Međedović, J., Mena-Pacheco, F., Milfont, T. L., Morris, W. L., Murphy, S. C., Myachykov, A., Neave, N., Neijenhuijs, K., Nelson, A. J., Neto, F., Lee Nichols, A., Ocampo, A., O’Donnell, S. L., Oikawa, H., Oikawa, M., Ong, E., Orosz, G., Osowiecka, M., Packard, G., Pérez-Sánchez, R., Petrović, B., Pilati, R., Pinter, B., Podesta, L., Pogge, G., Pollmann, M. M. H., Rutchick, A. M., Saavedra, P., Saeri, A. K., Salomon, E., Schmidt, K., Schönbrodt, F. D., Sekerdej, M. B., Sirlopú, D., Skorinko, J. L. M., Smith, M. A., Smith-Castro, V., Smolders, K. C. H. J., Sobkow, A., Sowden, W., Spachtholz, P., Srivastava, M., Steiner, T. G., Stouten, J., Street, C. N. H., Sundfelt, O. K., Szeto, S., Szumowska, E., Tang, A. C. W., Tanzer, N., Tear, M. J., Theriault, J., Thomae, M., Torres, D., Traczyk, J., Tybur, J. M., Ujhelyi, A., van Aert, R. C. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van der Hulst, M., van Lange, P. A. M., van ’t Veer, A. E., Vásquez- Echeverría, A., Ann Vaughn, L., Vázquez, A., Vega, L. D., Verniers, C., Verschoor, M., Voermans, I. P. J., Vranka, M. A., Welch, C., Wichman, A. L., Williams, L. A., Wood, M., Woodzicka, J. A., Wronska, M. K., Young, L., Zelenski, J. M., Zhijia, Z., & Nosek, B. A.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie: Personnalité, Cognition, Changement Social (FR)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Yaşar University (TR)
- American University of Sharjah (AE)
- Duke University (US)
- United Arab Emirates University (AE)
- Prague University of Economics and Business (CZ)
- Saint Joseph's University (US)
- Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
- California State University, San Marcos (US)
- Warsaw Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
- Department of General and Applied Psychology, University of Jos
- Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- UCLouvain (BE)
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad del Desarrollo
- University of Michigan (US)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- HELP University (MY)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of Salford (GB)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Azusa Pacific University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Grand Valley State University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Jos (NG)
- Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University
- Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua
- Wittenberg University (US)
- Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg University
- Leadership and Human Resource Management, WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management
- San Diego State University (US)
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen
- Başkent University (TR)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Allegheny College (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- Shanghai International Studies University (CN)
- Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
- Baruch College (US)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
- University of Utah (US)
- Pacific Lutheran University (US)
- Ghent University (BE)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Amity University (IN)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- William Paterson University (US)
- Lurie Children's Hospital (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem (CZ)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Department of Business Administration, Istanbul Bilgi University
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- East Texas A&M University (US)
- James Madison University (US)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Occidental College (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Open University of Tanzania (TZ)
- Tufts University (US)
- Singidunum University (RS)
- Latin University of Costa Rica (CR)
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- McDaniel College (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida
- George Fox University (US)
- Doshisha University (JP)
- Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK)
- Stanford University (US)
- Institute for Psychological Research, University of Costa Rica
- Institute of Criminological & Sociological Research (RS)
- California State University, Northridge (US)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Monash University (AU)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Jagiellonian University (PL)
- Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
- Wroclaw Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
- Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
- University of Regensburg (DE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Northeastern University (US)
- University of Winchester (GB)
- Universidad Iberoamericana (MX)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University
- Centro de Investigación Básica en Psicología, Universidad de la República
- Department of Psychology, Ithaca College
- Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Charles University (CZ)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Washington and Lee University (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Carleton University (CA)
- Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- Center for Open Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klein, Richard A.
- ORCID
- Klein, Richard A.
- Vianello, Michelangelo
- Hasselman, Fred
- Adams, Byron G.
- Adams, Reginald B.
- Alper, Sinan
- Aveyard, Mark
- Axt, Jordan R.
- Babalola, Mayowa T.
- Bahník, Štěpán
- Batra, Rishtee
- Berkics, Mihály
- Bernstein, Michael J.
- Berry, Daniel R.
- Bocian, Konrad
- Brandt, Mark J.
- Rédei, Anna Cabak
- Cai, Huajian
- Cambier, Fanny
- Cantarero, Katarzyna
- Carmichael, Cheryl L.
- Chandler, Jesse
- Chang, Jen-Ho
- Chatard, Armand
- Chen, Eva E.
- Cicero, David C.
- Coen, Sharon
- Coleman, Jennifer A.
- Collisson, Brian
- Conway, Morgan A.
- Corker, Katherine S.
- Curran, Paul G.
- Cushman, Fiery
- Devos, Thierry
- Doğulu, Canay
- Dukes, Kristin Nicole
- Dunham, Yarrow
- Durrheim, Kevin
- Ebersole, Charles R.
- Edlund, John E.
- English, Alexander Scott
- Finck, Carolyn
- Frankowska, Natalia
- Freyre, Miguel-Ángel
- Galliani, Elisa Maria
- Gandi, Joshua C.
- Ghoshal, Tanuka
- Giessner, Steffen R.
- Gill, Tripat
- Gnambs, Timo
- Gómez, Ángel
- González, Roberto
- Graham, Jesse
- Grahek, Ivan
- Green, Eva G. T.
- Haigh, Matthew
- Haines, Elizabeth L.
- Heffernan, Marie E.
- Hicks, Joshua A.
- Houdek, Petr
- Huynh, Ho Phi
- IJzerman, Hans
- Inbar, Yoel
- Innes-Ker, Åse H.
- John, Melissa-Sue
- Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A.
- Kappes, Heather Barry
- Keller, Victor N.
- Kende, Anna
- Kervyn, Nicolas
- Knežević, Goran
- Kovacs, Carrie
- Krueger, Lacy E.
- Lakens, Daniël
- Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
- Levitan, Carmel A.
- Lewis, Neil A.
- Lins, Samuel
- Lipsey, Nikolette P.
- Losee, Joy E.
- Maassen, Esther
- Maitner, Angela T.
- Malingumu, Winfrida
- Mallett, Robyn K.
- Marotta, Satia A.
- Međedović, Janko
- Milfont, Taciano L.
- Morris, Wendy L.
- Murphy, Sean C.
- Myachykov, Andriy
- Neave, Nick
- Neijenhuijs, Koen
- Neto, Félix
- Ong, Elsie
- Orosz, Gábor
- Packard, Grant
- Petrović, Boban
- Pilati, Ronaldo
- Podesta, Lysandra
- Pogge, Gabrielle
- Pollmann, Monique M. H.
- Rutchick, Abraham M.
- Saavedra, Patricio
- Saeri, Alexander K.
- Salomon, Erika
- Schmidt, Kathleen
- Schönbrodt, Felix D.
- Sekerdej, Maciej B.
- Sirlopú, David
- Skorinko, Jeanine L. M.
- Smith, Michael A.
- Smolders, Karin C. H. J.
- Sowden, Walter
- Steiner, Troy G.
- Stouten, Jeroen
- Street, Chris N. H.
- Szeto, Stephanie
- Szumowska, Ewa
- Tanzer, Norbert
- Tear, Morgan J.
- Theriault, Jordan
- Thomae, Manuela
- Torres, David
- Traczyk, Jakub
- Tybur, Joshua M.
- Ujhelyi, Adrienn
- Vázquez, Alexandra
- Vega, Luis Diego
- Verniers, Catherine
- Verschoor, Mark
- Vranka, Marek A.
- Wichman, Aaron L.
- Williams, Lisa A.
- Wood, Michael
- Woodzicka, Julie A.
- Wronska, Marta K.
- Young, Liane
- Zelenski, John M.
- Nosek, Brian A.
- Venue
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-490
- ISSN
- 2515-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2467
- OpenAlex
- W2776961836
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 142
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 79.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (acceptedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (acceptedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (acceptedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons - George Fox University (George Fox University) (submittedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Tilburg University Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Association for Psychological Science
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- replication, effect size heterogeneity, setting effects, pre-registered replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review