The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Paradoxical Profession: Project Management and the Contradictory Nature of Sustainable Project Objectives
Abstract
Professions are undergoing a significant change in how they integrate environmental and social objectives into their core values. This article examines the situation in which those working in the project management profession are expected to work under contradictory sustainability constraints. In this article, we investigate the tensions project managers experience when addressing sustainable objectives. Results show that when tensions arise over sustainable objectives (temporality of objectives, organizational barriers, and lack of control), they are addressed only when anchored to an economic one in the form of a business case for sustainability. We also find that when matching traditional project objectives with sustainable ones is not possible, practitioners enact a set of reactions characterized as greenwashing, it can’t be one person, no space for sustainability in my job, other actors involved, or pushing back, depending on the specific project context. Adopting the paradox theory lens, we provide an alternative approach to the business case for sustainability. The practical contribution of this article lies in suggesting the need to find strategies to embrace paradoxical situations and we provide some suggestions to illustrate this.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This confirms previous research on sustain ability in project results, where a broader perspective than the tradi tional cost, time, and quality is called for”
From Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance (2025) · cites this paper as Sabini and Alderman, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.001.0001 · Cited by 10,965
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
Research works printed but not linked: 64
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.10.1.43 · DOI
- Brent A., 2007, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18, 1
- Brook J., 2014, Journal of Engineering and Technology, 34, 46
- Brundtland G. H, 1987, Our common future: World Commission on environment and development
- 10.1007/s10551-017-3582-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.018 · DOI
- 10.1177/875697280603700311 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.006 · DOI
- Dalcher D, 2012, PM World Journal, 1, 1
- 10.2307/258887 · DOI · Paper page
- Ebbesen J. B., 2013, PM World Journal, 2, 1
- Elkington J, 1997, Environmental management: Readings and cases, 49
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.064 · DOI
- Gareis R., 2011, Project perspectives, 60
- 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
- Gregersen H., 1994, Policy Brief, 1791
- 10.1007/s10551-011-0911-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.674 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2012.0341 · DOI
- Hall J., 2003, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45, 61
- 10.1002/pmj.21258 · DOI
- 10.1108/IJMPB-10-2015-0105 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10551-017-3580-9 · DOI
- International Project Management Association (IPMA), 2015, Code of ethics and professional conduct
- 10.1007/978-0-230-20929-9_3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.045 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020 · DOI
- 10.2307/3556659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/su11185016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.039 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393352 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2012.1049 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.538 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijmr.12199 · DOI
- 10.2307/258559 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5539/jms.v9n2p90 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017EF000632 · DOI
- Project Management Institute (PMI). (2010). The bottom line on sustainability (pp. 1–8). Author.
- 10.1021/sc300131e · DOI
- 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2017-0011 · DOI
- Sabini L., 2017, IRNOP, 1
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1093/jpo/joab001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.087 · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026617722882 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.115 · DOI
- 10.1362/204440814X13948909253866 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.08.003 · DOI
- 10.4018/978-1-4666-4177-8.ch013 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134 · DOI
- Strauss A., 1998, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
- 10.2307/30040729 · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026615575047 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00187-8 · DOI
- Whelan T., 2016, Harvard Business Review, 21, 2
- 10.1002/csr.293 · DOI
- Yin R, 2009, Qualitative research from start to finish
- 10.1177/875697281704800508 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance
Lingegård, S., & Hedborg, S. (2025) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2025.100194 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Sabini, L., & Alderman, N.
- Affiliations
- Hertfordshire University, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Newcastle University, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Venue
- Project Management Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-06-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379-393
- ISSN
- 8756-9728
- 1938-9507
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
