Cited by 67

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Paradoxical Profession: Project Management and the Contradictory Nature of Sustainable Project Objectives

Sabini, Luca, Alderman, Neil·2021·Project Management Journal

Abstract

Professions are undergoing a significant change in how they integrate environmental and social objectives into their core values. This article examines the situation in which those working in the project management profession are expected to work under contradictory sustainability constraints. In this article, we investigate the tensions project managers experience when addressing sustainable objectives. Results show that when tensions arise over sustainable objectives (temporality of objectives, organizational barriers, and lack of control), they are addressed only when anchored to an economic one in the form of a business case for sustainability. We also find that when matching traditional project objectives with sustainable ones is not possible, practitioners enact a set of reactions characterized as greenwashing, it can’t be one person, no space for sustainability in my job, other actors involved, or pushing back, depending on the specific project context. Adopting the paradox theory lens, we provide an alternative approach to the business case for sustainability. The practical contribution of this article lies in suggesting the need to find strategies to embrace paradoxical situations and we provide some suggestions to illustrate this.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/87569728211007660

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006 · DOI
  2. 10.1287/orsc.10.1.43 · DOI
  3. Brent A., 2007, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18, 1
  4. Brook J., 2014, Journal of Engineering and Technology, 34, 46
  5. Brundtland G. H, 1987, Our common future: World Commission on environment and development
  6. 10.1007/s10551-017-3582-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.018 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/875697280603700311 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.006 · DOI
  11. Dalcher D, 2012, PM World Journal, 1, 1
  12. 10.2307/258887 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ebbesen J. B., 2013, PM World Journal, 2, 1
  14. Elkington J, 1997, Environmental management: Readings and cases, 49
  15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.064 · DOI
  16. Gareis R., 2011, Project perspectives, 60
  17. 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gregersen H., 1994, Policy Brief, 1791
  19. 10.1007/s10551-011-0911-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/bse.674 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5 · DOI
  22. 10.5465/amr.2012.0341 · DOI
  23. Hall J., 2003, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45, 61
  24. 10.1002/pmj.21258 · DOI
  25. 10.1108/IJMPB-10-2015-0105 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/s10551-017-3580-9 · DOI
  28. International Project Management Association (IPMA), 2015, Code of ethics and professional conduct
  29. 10.1007/978-0-230-20929-9_3 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.045 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/3556659 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.3390/su11185016 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.039 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/2393352 · DOI
  36. 10.5465/amj.2012.1049 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/bse.538 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/ijmr.12199 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/258559 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.5539/jms.v9n2p90 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/2017EF000632 · DOI
  42. Project Management Institute (PMI). (2010). The bottom line on sustainability (pp. 1–8). Author.
  43. 10.1021/sc300131e · DOI
  44. 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2017-0011 · DOI
  45. Sabini L., 2017, IRNOP, 1
  46. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.002 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/jpo/joab001 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.087 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/1086026617722882 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.115 · DOI
  52. 10.1362/204440814X13948909253866 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.08.003 · DOI
  55. 10.4018/978-1-4666-4177-8.ch013 · DOI
  56. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134 · DOI
  57. Strauss A., 1998, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
  58. 10.2307/30040729 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/1086026615575047 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00187-8 · DOI
  61. Whelan T., 2016, Harvard Business Review, 21, 2
  62. 10.1002/csr.293 · DOI
  63. Yin R, 2009, Qualitative research from start to finish
  64. 10.1177/875697281704800508 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 67

Metadata

Authors
Sabini, L., & Alderman, N.
Affiliations
  • Hertfordshire University, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Newcastle University, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Venue
Project Management Journal
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
379-393
ISSN
  • 8756-9728
  • 1938-9507
Cited by
67
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review